We have become known as a group of people who sees themselves perpetually under attack, perpetually victimized, and perpetually entitled, a group who, ironically, often responds to these imagined disadvantages by advancing legislation that restricts
the civil liberties of other people.
US Christians concerned to suppress
the civil liberties of others are agitating in Wisconsin to burn a novel that is sympathetic to the plight of young homosexuals.
Not exact matches
Cook wrote that the government should drop the legal request and instead «form a commission or
other panel
of experts on intelligence, technology, and
civil liberties, to discuss the implications for law enforcement, national security, privacy, and personal freedom.»
To
other Bloomington residents, the sexual preference amendment signaled a victory for human justice and
civil liberties in keeping with the spirit
of American democracy.
On some Israeli causes they will find their best allies in dispensational premillennial fundamentalism, while on issues
of civil liberties and
other causes they will coalesce with moderate - to - liberal Protestants.
The orders are also, in the Lutheran view, a school in which all citizens are educated to care for each
other, to do their duties even against their egoistic drives, and to use their «
liberty and ability to achieve
civil righteousness,» as Article XVIII
of the Apology
of the Augsburg Confession puts it.
It will insist that any version
of Christian faith that does not grapple with war and peace, human equality, hunger,
civil liberties, the hard decisions posed by medical technology, and a host
of other social challenges is not a version
of faith worth the time
of either pulpit or pew.
The
civil libertarians have not recognized the problem: by their lights, the
liberties of the creationists and
others who hold
other - than - naturalistic views
of human origins are not being infringed upon because only scientific truth is arrayed against them.
It can remind us that those who so cherished
liberty for themselves were willing to enslave and exploit
others; that a
civil war and long years
of struggle were required before the nation legally ended slavery, segregation and discrimination and attempted to redress the harm done to the conquered native people.
A number
of Protestant, Catholic and
civil liberties groups challenged this special nod to one faith, declaring that such recognition jeopardizes the rights
of other churches (and
of individual Catholics) by creating a direct government link with the Vatican.
I think there was a time that many believed their faith drove them to seek justice - abolitionists,
civil rights leader, healthcare, etc. but now it just seems many want to isolate themselves from the «
others» who won't «turn to Christ» and deny them rights in the name
of religious
liberty.
Bishop Paulose who was deeply concerned about
civil liberties and
other fundamental rights
of citizens realized that the Emergency was an attempt to crush democracy by an authoritarian regime.
Preemptive wars, abridgments
of civil liberty, cuts in social service, subsidies to churches, and
other like initiatives are not just wrapped in the flag; together with the flag, they are swathed in the holy.
The amendment to the
civil liberties policy motion read: «The protection
of freedom
of expression, by reforming the libel laws in England and Wales to ensure a better balance is provided between free speech, responsible journalism, scientific discourse and the public interest on one hand and powerful corporations, wealthy individuals and vested interests on the
other.»
It is ridiculous that we were made to look to the right
of the
other parties on
civil liberties.
He is openly racist, supports the use
of torture and
other mass
civil liberties violations, has praised Kim Jong - un, Bashar al - Assad and Saddam Hussein, and has refused to rule out using nuclear weapons against Europe.
Definitions vary, but democracies have constitutions protecting citizens rights,
civil liberties, rule
of law, equality before the law, and
other rights.
What
civil liberties for god sake we are watched all day spied on, told to inform on each
other, what a lot
of New labour crap.
Laws must be enacted to balance the countries «need to know» to keep societies safe on the one hand, and accountable and transparent guarantee
of civil liberties for all, at all times and under all circumstances, on the
other hand.
Civil liberties advocates feared that an I.D. card program open to those lacking
other kinds
of paperwork could, if seized by unsympathetic federal authorities, become a deportation database.
I am sure there are some Labour politicians who are sound on
civil liberties, as there are also in the
other parties, but given the record
of Labour in government and the record
of Tories in opposition (oh, how they cared back then) the evidence is emphatic: the state can not be trusted, and the politicians are either incapable or unwilling to control or restrain the state machinery.
Now
other parties must support Liberal Democrat efforts to protect the
civil liberties of UK and European citizens through better - targeted laws with stricter safeguards on collection, storage, intercept and access to citizens» digital communications.
Overall, it seems to me that the LD defence
of «achieving what we could with the power we had» is probably quite defensible on
civil liberties, on green issues, on political reform; on libel reform, perhaps the EU for now, and perhaps
other issues.
The UK may block an extradition on the basis
of procedural grounds but not for any
other reason, raising concerns from
civil liberties campaigners.
In June 2008 the then Shadow Home Secretary David Davis resigned his parliamentary seat over what he described as the «erosion
of civil liberties» by the then Labour government, and was re-elected on a
civil liberties platform (although he was not opposed by candidates
of other major parties).
Many
of the suggestions reflected Tory policy, such as immediate plans to cut the deficit or a cap on non-EU immigration, but
others clearly showed a high degree
of Lib Dem influence, notably over
civil liberties, where a Great Repeal Bill has been promised.
And whilst it is welcome to have Liberal Democrat support on spending cuts and on certain
civil liberties issues, and whilst we could well have compromised with the Liberal Democrats on a number
of other issues, we didn't need a coalition and if a referendum on AV was the price
of formal coalition we should never have agreed to it.
In addition to the presumptive mayoral hopefuls, the raiding
of Zuccotti was slammed by numerous
other elected officials and
civil liberties advocates.
Grandchildren manage the scene, how ask to if you are interested, go out decent tool to set the
Civil liberties union and national institute
of public health at the expense
of some
other.
Her work had not focused on race relations or
civil liberties or any
of the
other hot buttons
of the day.
The orthodox way in its analysis has a method
of protecting either national security, or
civil liberties, as if the protection
of one undermines the protection
of the
other.
By pardoning Arpaio, Trump gives rogue cops and police departments the carte blanche to engage in criminal abuse
of immigrants as well as blessed all kinds
of police brutality and
other violations
of civil liberties of all Americans.
However, an agency's ease
of enforcement should never be given precedence over the protection
of an American's right to privacy or any
other civil liberty.
Other works by Sophie Calle and Carey Young examine the boundaries
of repression versus freedom, and censorship versus
civil liberties.
Freedom to drive really really really fast with the deliberate intention
of hurting
others is not a political
liberty, nor even a
civil liberty.
As Justice Stratas put it to the attendees, should Canada ever be gripped by some form
of threat or disorder, leading the government to abridge the
civil liberties of many Canadians, do we want the judge deciding the constitutionality
of the government's action to be able to turn to a body
of constitutional law «based on fundamental principles, consistently applied over decades» — in
other words, «settled legal doctrine» — or do we want the judge deciding the issue based upon «her or his own worldview?»
Freedom
of the press, the right to know and
other aspects
of civil liberties are being eroded by the courts imposing super injunctions.
And finally, D'Arcy Jenish writes about the October Crisis
of 1970 in Legion Magazine (September, 2010) that «Tommy Douglas, leader
of the federal New Democratic Party, accused Trudeau
of using «a sledgehammer to crack a peanut,» and as well «A quarter
of a century later, in a memoir published in 1996, longtime Conservative aide and adviser Hugh Segal wrote that «
Civil liberties, including the right to free assembly, the right to free speech and
other fundamental rights (were) suspended across the land.
We continue to be recognised as a leading set in our
other specialist practice areas including Public Law («the go - to set for any heavyweight piece
of work»),
Civil Liberties and Human Rights («a strong choice for a wide range of civil liberties work»), and Public Procurement («for many the top set for public and EU law&raq
Civil Liberties and Human Rights («a strong choice for a wide range
of civil liberties work»), and Public Procurement («for many the top set for public and EU law&raq
civil liberties work»), and Public Procurement («for many the top set for public and EU law»).
In October, CCLA joined with nine
other domestic
civil liberties and human rights organizations from around the world to release a report, «Take back the streets»: Repression and criminalization
of protest around the world.
English Pen, Big Brother Watch and
other civil liberties campaigners brought the action following revelations about GCHQ's collection
of internet data from millions
of people not under any suspicion.
Each year our attorneys provide hundreds
of hours
of pro bono legal representation for dozens
of nonprofit organizations on environmental,
civil liberties and
other issues.
We assent fully to all that is said in the opinion
of the inestimable value
of the trial by jury, and
of the
other constitutional safeguards
of civil liberty.
Dozens
of other technology, media and
civil liberties groups filed briefs supporting Microsoft last month, and the case is pending.