8) Civil Liberties Which should take priority under the law:
the civil liberties of the individual, or the right of the state to maintain its own security?
The Orwellian provisions proposed by ACTA of mandatory network - level filtering by ISPs will have a considerable impact upon
the civil liberties of individuals and may well be incompatible with human rights legislation.
Mosaic Community Services 2015 Visionary Award in recognition of Andy's «faithful and relentless» advocacy on behalf of
the civil liberties of individuals with mental illness.
Not exact matches
Therefore, it is increasingly likely that the EU will become more totalitarian and try to push further centralization and restriction
of civil and
individual liberties.
Remember Justice Kennedy's astonishing words in Lawrence v. Texas about the word
liberty in our Constitution, the words which will serve to justify the emerging right to same - sex marriage and even the deconstruction
of civil marriage itself as an oppressive constraint on the
individual:
In the recent book,
Civil Liberties Under Attack, one of the authors mentions the case of a government official with an impeccable record who was placed under charges because unidentified informers asserted he «advocated the Communist Party line, such as favoring peace and civil liberties,» and «his convictions concerning equal rights for all races and classes extend slightly beyond the normal feelings of the average individual &la
Civil Liberties Under Attack, one
of the authors mentions the case
of a government official with an impeccable record who was placed under charges because unidentified informers asserted he «advocated the Communist Party line, such as favoring peace and
civil liberties,» and «his convictions concerning equal rights for all races and classes extend slightly beyond the normal feelings of the average individual &la
civil liberties,» and «his convictions concerning equal rights for all races and classes extend slightly beyond the normal feelings
of the average
individual «1
A number
of Protestant, Catholic and
civil liberties groups challenged this special nod to one faith, declaring that such recognition jeopardizes the rights
of other churches (and
of individual Catholics) by creating a direct government link with the Vatican.
Thus, the civic debate about sexuality has shifted from the ballot box to the
civil courts, and the rhetoric
of individual liberty has been exchanged for that
of civil rights.
The amendment to the
civil liberties policy motion read: «The protection
of freedom
of expression, by reforming the libel laws in England and Wales to ensure a better balance is provided between free speech, responsible journalism, scientific discourse and the public interest on one hand and powerful corporations, wealthy
individuals and vested interests on the other.»
Some
of our values are clear — internationalism, protecting individuality and non-conformity, hating bullying and the abuse
of power, promoting environmentalism, protecting
civil liberties and a love
of democracy not so much because we think it efficient or effective but because it expresses a basic equality
of respect for all
individuals.
On 15 June 1215 at Runnymede (a small meadow outside
of London, marking the midpoint between two armies locked in
civil war) King John set his seal on Magna Carta — the «great charter» that has become synonymous throughout the world with opposition to arbitrary rule, and with the protection
of individual rights and
liberties.
This requires restructuring the state in a much more decentralised direction;
individual empowerment in public services; a wider distribution
of assets; and a stronger policy
of protecting - indeed, expanding -
civil liberties and lifestyle freedom.
In this context, the logical step to take, at the very least, is to amend laws to negotiate the protection
of individual freedoms and
civil liberties to the maximum extent possible.
On a vast array
of profound issues — ranging from climate change and
civil liberties to drone strikes, perpetual war and a huge military budget — some
individual progressives in Congress introduce outstanding bills and make excellent statements.
Civil libertarianism is a strain of political thought that supports civil liberties, or which emphasizes the supremacy of individual rights and personal freedoms over and against any kind of authority (such as a state, a corporation, social norms imposed through peer pressure, e
Civil libertarianism is a strain
of political thought that supports
civil liberties, or which emphasizes the supremacy of individual rights and personal freedoms over and against any kind of authority (such as a state, a corporation, social norms imposed through peer pressure, e
civil liberties, or which emphasizes the supremacy
of individual rights and personal freedoms over and against any kind
of authority (such as a state, a corporation, social norms imposed through peer pressure, etc.).
In this episode
of the Modern Law Library, professor Adam Winkler, author
of We the Corporations: How American Businesses Won Their
Civil Rights, shares what he learned from his investigation into how corporations have achieved constitutional protections ranging from the right to sue and be sued, to
individual rights like religious
liberty protections and free speech.
Whether acting in a competition case, a challenge to telecommunications regulation, a corporate tax dispute or an important matter
of civil liberties, Monckton is able to offer a range
of market leading practitioners, at all levels
of seniority, dedicated to assisting clients, whether
individuals, regulatory bodies or companies, to ensure that their rights are upheld and their interests protected.
The
Civil Remedies Act offends
individual liberties and RH Criminal Defence is here to serve and protect
individuals in legal matters whenever such an
individual is unjustly targeted by the shortcomings
of the
Civil Remedies Act.
As a result, even though there are presumably no security concerns that would justify closing the fence early, we are already seeing a significant erosion
of individuals»
civil liberties in this area.
«The term «pro bono» refers to activities
of the firm undertaken normally without expectation
of fee and not in the course
of ordinary commercial practice and consisting
of (i) the delivery
of legal services to persons
of limited means or to charitable, religious, civic, community, governmental, and educational organizations in matters which are designed primarily to address the needs
of persons
of limited means; (ii) the provision
of legal assistance to
individuals, groups, or organizations seeking to secure or protect
civil rights,
civil liberties, or public rights; and (iii) the provision
of legal assistance to charitable, religious, civic, community, governmental, or educational organizations in matters in furtherance
of their organizational purposes, where the payment
of standard legal fees would significantly deplete the organization's economic resources or would be otherwise inappropriate.»
Coptic Solidarity welcomes the new administration's desire to partner with Egypt to defeat terrorism, but strongly urges it to simultaneously raise and demand radical improvement in areas
of human rights,
individual liberties and
civil society with the Egyptian government.
It is very easy for
civil liberties to be compromised in a system where
individuals are often unrepresented and face a large team
of city council lawyers and police officers making statements and giving evidence.
Notable mandates: Represented physicians involved in providing care to Ashley Smith during the 2013 coroner's inquest; acted for Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne in a defamation action against Ontario Progressive Conservative party leader Tim Hudak and energy critic Lisa MacLeod; in Wise v. Iran, acted for a Canadian victim
of a suicide bombing (executed by
individuals who received material support from Iran) who sought leave to intervene in ongoing proceedings commenced by United States plaintiffs in the Ontario Superior Court
of Justice seeking orders recognizing the enforceability in Ontario
of judgments they obtained from a U.S. court against Iran totaling about $ 370 million; in Khadr v. Edmonton Institution, acted as lead counsel for an intervener, the Canadian
Civil Liberties Association, to argue that in interpreting Omar Khadr's sentence for the purpose
of enforcing it in Canada, Correctional Services Canada was obliged to consider Khadr's right to
liberty and principles
of fundamental justice; acted for a physician in a malpractice claim in Moore v. Getahun, a precedent - setting case about restrictions on communication between counsel and experts in preparation
of expert reports.
Furthermore, the CCLA brought up the issue that faces are constantly changing, and facial biometrics open a Pandora's box for mass surveillance by states
of individuals, with a corresponding chilling effect on many
civil liberties.
Foley Hoag has been at the forefront
of efforts to provide quality legal representation to disadvantaged and disfavored
individuals and groups whose
civil rights and
liberties are threatened.
We read, review and take note
of all enquiries as part
of our ongoing efforts to monitor the state
of civil liberties in Canada, and greatly benefit when
individuals and groups bring personal or public issues to our attention.
Contempt
of court is the only
civil proceeding that could result in jail and because
of the potential impact on an
individual's
liberty, the formalities must be strictly complied with ̶ clear, precise and unambiguous notice
of the specific contempt offence for which he or she is being charged must be given, and the elements required for a conviction proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
Legal Aid The Nova Scotia Legal Aid Commission provides legal representation to qualified applicants, with priority for matters involving
liberty and
civil rights, and integrity and protection
of an
individual's family.