But the Lib Dems» commitment to democratic reform and
civil liberties seems to block off the left as well.
Not exact matches
Undaunted, the supposed guardians of
civil liberties — except the free exercise of religion, it
seems — recently brought a case against a Catholic hospital for refusing to permit doctors to perform an elective hysterectomy as part of a sex - reassignment surgery.
I think there was a time that many believed their faith drove them to seek justice - abolitionists,
civil rights leader, healthcare, etc. but now it just
seems many want to isolate themselves from the «others» who won't «turn to Christ» and deny them rights in the name of religious
liberty.
But some people would say that for people who believe in
civil liberties, 90 - day detention - which just
seems symbolic of everything, Habeas Corpus and so on - on principle you couldn't possibly have voted for it.
Overall, it
seems to me that the LD defence of «achieving what we could with the power we had» is probably quite defensible on
civil liberties, on green issues, on political reform; on libel reform, perhaps the EU for now, and perhaps other issues.
The new government's commitments to
civil liberties are welcome, but the CBI
seems to think human rights stop at the workplace door.»
Her on - screen confidence and behind - the - scenes negotiations won the day against some of New Labour's most draconian proposals and kept the flame alive when it
seemed as if no - one really cared about
civil liberties anymore.
It
seems, on close reading of his history of
liberty from the English
Civil War onwards, the fundamental shift occurred not in the last ten years but in the last 100.
Instead he should focus on «core liberal issues such as
civil liberties and the environment, which the Conservatives
seem intent on trashing», he said in the New Statesman magazine.
Now, with Clegg and Cameron looking like the embodiment of bourgeois bleeding - hearts — all «Big Society» promises and strong talk on
civil liberties — some Labour people
seem to have come to a truly stupid conclusion: that the Con - Dem coalition has to be outflanked on the right, because the proles demand it.
DD has to be restored as Shadow HS in place of the lamentable Dominic Grieve, who
seems only too pleased to up the bidding in the ongoing auction of our
civil liberties.
Joe — «In effect you
seem to be saying that any restriction on
civil liberty means that the population is «deprived of material
liberty»» No we're not.
You
seem to think that
civil liberties and a more just structure for society are the main drivers, but they are not, though I do sympathise.
From the right to die, to aboriginal rights and
civil liberties, Joseph Arvay
seems to be at the centre of every legal story of significance in Canada.
Although there
seems to be widespread belief to the contrary — i.e., that a criminal proceeding where
liberty is at stake necessarily takes precedence over a
civil one which is «only about money» — in fact, a criminal case has very little legal impact on a
civil case.
It
seems to me that technology has moved too quickly for the law too keep up, and unfortunately (as you might have noticed) several factors are preventing our current leadership — municipal, provincial and federal — from moving on the issue of citizens» privacy and
civil liberties.