The Stonewall Democrats of WNY and another group, Outspoken for Equality, issued a joined statement thanking the singer for, as Stonewall President Bryan Ball put it, using «her power and influence to encourage Western New Yorkers to lobby our new Sen. Mark Gristanti on why it is crucial he support
civil marriage equality in New York.»
Wait until
civil marriage equality goes national in 2013, and Hobby Lobby has to cover legal same - gender spouses.
Not exact matches
Civil rights means the rights to full legal, social, and economic
equality, there are benefits when you get married gay partnership do not have if they are denied
marriage.
Marriage equality ensures all citizens enjoy equal
civil rights under Law.
As more states embrace
marriage equality and
civil rights for LGBT people, how do you think the conversation regarding their inclusion in the church will change?
due to some crazy religious beliefs out there in the world i.e. marrying off young children and marrying genetic kin, the government can't ever allow religion to dictate
marriage policy, so have your ceremonies and deny same - gender couples to marry in your church but bluntly stated your crying and foot - stomping will accomplish nothing,
marriage isn't a religious thing it is a
civil rights and
equality thing, thus if the religious win by denying same gender cuples their
civil rights to equal treatment under the law, then don't be surprised when others use those same grounds to deny you your rights under the law.
Further, reducing all
marriages to
civil unions by recognizing
marriages as business contracts removes the argument from debate by recognizing
equality for all regardless of their beliefs.
Issues of polygamy and concubinage are conpletely ignored, just for starters, nor is there any recognition that Paul treats
marriage the way he treats slavery — in response to a
civil insitution that mandates
equality.
Next spring, the government will begin a consultation on introducing what is often referred to as «full
marriage equality», that is to say legislating to allow two men and two women as well as one man and one woman to form a
civil marriage contract.
Duprey voted «no» in 2007, but then changed her position when he measure came up again in 2009, explaining she had become convinced that
civil unions would not provide gay couples with the same
equality as
marriage.
«With the
civil rights of New Yorkers hanging in the balance, Donovan needs to state publicly: Does he take his cues on intolerance from his mentor and political patron Guy Molinari, or does he stand with principled New Yorkers — and now, thankfully, a federal court — who view
marriage equality as a fundamental right?»
Although
civil marriage is not yet available for same sex couples in the UK, the Government announced in 2011 that it would review the issue as part of its commitment to advancing LGBT
equality.
The first hit came courtesy of state Democratic Chairman Jay Jacobs, who called on Staten Island DA Dan Donovan, the lone Republican AG candidate, to «finally publicly state whether or not he supports
marriage equality, one of the defining
civil rights issues of this generation.»
/ speculation As this vote only affected
civil weddings, a Muslim could still believe that Muslims should only marry people of the opposite gender in a Muslim wedding, while voting in favour of
marriage equality for secular weddings.
The president's ongoing support of
civil unions over full
marriage equality has caused consternation among his LGBT supporters — particularly in the wake of a federal judge's ruling last week that overturned California's Prop. 8.
During his time in the legislature, Brian has sponsored legislation and worked with colleagues to extend and strengthen tenant protections; increase New York's commitment to cleaner more sustainable energy sources and greater efficiency; prevent people from being exposed to toxic chemicals; increase the minimum wage; ensure
equality in
civil marriage laws; strengthen laws intended to keep guns out of the wrong hands; and promote cleaner, fairer elections by modernizing voting and closing loopholes in campaign finance laws.
«Over the past few months I've spoken to a lot of LGB and T people and campaign groups, and it quickly became clear that there is a real desire to address the differences between
civil marriage and
civil partnerships,»
equalities minister Lynne Featherstone said.
The Equal Love campaign was dedicated to full
equality in
civil marriage and
civil partnership law.
«Despite proclaiming that the legalisation of same - sex
civil marriage is driven by the principle of
equality, the government's forthcoming legislation will retain the inequality of the current legal ban on heterosexual
civil partnerships,» Tatchell said.
The Conservative MP claimed allowing same - sex
marriage would «fully complete the journey of
equality», following the introduction of
civil partnerships.
Despite the rapid progress in the public acceptance of
marriage equality, at least when compared with past
civil rights struggles, same - sex
marriage remains controversial, and some worry that it will weaken the institution of
marriage itself.
A number of witnesses were to testify in favor of a
marriage equality plank in the platform: Marc Solomon, national campaign director for Freedom to Marry; Allison Herwitt, legislative director for the Human Rights Campaign; Army Chief Warrant Officer Charlie Morgan, a lesbian New Hampshire guardsman with stage - four incurable breast cancer and a plaintiff in Servicemembers Legal Defense Network's lawsuit against the Defense of Marriage Act; Michael Macleod - Ball, the American Civil Liberties Union's chief of staff for the Washington Legislative Office; and Aaron Zellhoefer, a gay delegate to the Democratic National Convention representing the National Stonewall De
marriage equality plank in the platform: Marc Solomon, national campaign director for Freedom to Marry; Allison Herwitt, legislative director for the Human Rights Campaign; Army Chief Warrant Officer Charlie Morgan, a lesbian New Hampshire guardsman with stage - four incurable breast cancer and a plaintiff in Servicemembers Legal Defense Network's lawsuit against the Defense of
Marriage Act; Michael Macleod - Ball, the American Civil Liberties Union's chief of staff for the Washington Legislative Office; and Aaron Zellhoefer, a gay delegate to the Democratic National Convention representing the National Stonewall De
Marriage Act; Michael Macleod - Ball, the American
Civil Liberties Union's chief of staff for the Washington Legislative Office; and Aaron Zellhoefer, a gay delegate to the Democratic National Convention representing the National Stonewall Democrats.
Same - sex
marriage versus
marriage equality — same issue but quite different connotations: Is it an aberration or a
civil right?
Marriage equality is an issue of
civil rights, a basic issue of
civil rights.»
She support her
civil rights for
marriage equality but, as mayor, would continue to infringe on the rights of the BLACK & LATINO males that get harassed via S&F.
No person should ever be denied their
civil rights or the basic freedoms others can enjoy... I am fully committed to continuing the process of securing the 32 votes necessary for passage and ensuring that all New Yorkers can realize the right of
marriage equality which is fundamentally theirs.»
Paterson has previously said he's committed to bringing «full
marriage equality in New York state,» adding it's a problem that gays and lesbians who live in a
civil union aren't entitled to around 1,300
civil protections that are available to married couples.
In a New York Post op - ed over the weekend, Benjamin argues that the fight for
marriage equality for gay residents of the Empire State should not be compared to the
civil rights battles waged by African Americans: «The same - sex -
marriage movement is not nobly about obtaining a long - denied
civil right.
«After much deliberation and after reviewing the legal, public policy, and
civil rights questions presented, I support
marriage equality for same - sex couples and believe that DOMA should be repealed,» he said in a statement.
We have witnessed so much positive change which seemed like a distant dream 40 years ago:
civil rights in New York State and City, and
marriage equality throughout the country.
The reason seems to be issue - oriented: for example, the momentum for
equality and
civil rights for LGBTQ individuals and support for gay
marriage seems to have brought the issue of LGBTQ bullying to the fore.
As of June 1st, Illinois's
marriage equality law went into effect, and we went to officially convert our
civil union to a
marriage.
Public opinion on
marriage equality shifted more dramatically than nearly any other
civil rights debate in history.
«Two years ago, when I wanted to give a speech outlining the case for
marriage equality in New York, I came right here to this stage at The Cooper Union, because I believe that
marriage equality is the
civil rights issue of our time.
In recent decades, movements from
marriage equality to
civil rights to ending apartheid have fought to make our world a more fair, just, and wonderful place.
We are extremely proud this year to be presenting our Great Friend of Justice award to Mary L. Bonauto, the
civil rights lawyer whose powerful arguments and long - term legal strategies have led to historic strides in achieving
marriage equality for same - sex couples across the United States.
Over the years, Scarinci Hollenbeck attorneys have been involved in pro bono matters relating to important
civil rights issues in New Jersey, such as representing the New Jersey State Bar Association as amicus curiae in the
marriage equality litigation (Lewis v. Harris), and defending the Anti-School Bullying Act in a challenge before New Jersey's Council on Local Mandates.
Civil Partnership Bill, Dermot Ahern, Gay and Lesbian
Equality Network, Kieran Rose,
marriage equality
The position of the
Equality Authority is that
civil marriage for gay and lesbian couples is the full equality solution, but we welcome the Civil Partnership Bill as it will provide immediate legal solutions to the many urgent and pressing problems which gay and lesbian couples face in the absence of legal recognition of their relations
civil marriage for gay and lesbian couples is the full
equality solution, but we welcome the
Civil Partnership Bill as it will provide immediate legal solutions to the many urgent and pressing problems which gay and lesbian couples face in the absence of legal recognition of their relations
Civil Partnership Bill as it will provide immediate legal solutions to the many urgent and pressing problems which gay and lesbian couples face in the absence of legal recognition of their relationships.
Although
civil partnership does offer some rights and protections, it is not
equality and it does not extend all the same rights to same sex couples as
marriage would, including rights...
«To move to
marriage now and provide full Constitutional
equality for lesbian and gay people is not a massive legislative leap; it is an incremental step building on the success of
Civil Partnerships» concluded Rose.
In 2002 the
Equality Authority called for equal access to
civil marriage, and for
equality in other relevant areas of family law, for same - sex couples.
It has recently been reported that the government's consultation on
equality of
marriage and
civil partnerships is to be delayed.
On this 4th of July week, I am reminded of other groundbreaking SCOTUS decisions deemed controversial in their time, which also redefined and recognized
equality and
civil rights, such as Loving v. Virginia, which struck down individual state's bans on interracial
marriage.
Civil Partnership Bill, Dail, David Norris, Gay and Lesbian
Equality Network,
marriage equality, Seanad
In the driving seat is Tánaiste Eamon Gilmore, sporting a big red T - shirt with the message, «
Civil partnership is NOT
marriage equality».
There was plenty of discussion about the impact of
marriage equality on capital gains exclusions and title insurance decisions, but the roughly 150 attendees at the half - day continuing education class sponsored by the Cincinnati Area Board of REALTORS ® gained an even deeper understanding of the emotional meaning of the landmark decision when the lead plaintiff in the case, Jim Obergefell, opened the session by sharing the personal journey that has turned him into a national
civil rights hero for many.