They are dedicated to resolving family and
civil matters without litigation.
Not exact matches
Among them were pantheism and the positions that human reason is the sole arbiter of truth and falsehood and good and evil; that Christian faith contradicts reason; that Christ is a myth; that philosophy must be treated
without reference to supernatural revelation; that every man is free to embrace the religion which, guided by the light of reason, he believes to be true; that Protestantism is another form of the Christian religion in which it is possible to be as pleasing to God as in the Catholic Church; that the
civil power can determine the limits within which the Catholic Church may exercise authority; that Roman Pontiffs and Ecumenical Councils have erred in defining
matters of faith and morals; that the Church does not have direct or indirect temporal power or the right to invoke force; that in a conflict between Church and State the
civil law should prevail; that the
civil power has the right to appoint and depose bishops; that the entire direction of public schools in which the youth of Christian states are educated must be by the
civil power; that the Church should be separated from the State and the State from the Church; that moral laws do not need divine sanction; that it is permissible to rebel against legitimate princes; that a
civil contract may among Christians constitute true marriage; that the Catholic religion should no longer be the religion of the State to the exclusion of all other forms of worship; and «that the Roman Pontiff can and should reconcile himself to and agree with progress, liberalism and modern civilization.»
the view that public education and other
matters of
civil policy should be conducted
without the introduction of a religious element.
Without a Charter right to timely proceedings in private
matters, many
civil lawyers have been complaining about an even more pronounced delay in
civil proceedings.
The House of Lords recognised that the issue in this case was a
matter of general public interest and Lord Hope noted that the problem «has become an increasingly pressing social problem, as house prices rise and more and more people are living together
without getting married or entering into a
civil partnership».
«The term «pro bono» refers to activities of the firm undertaken normally
without expectation of fee and not in the course of ordinary commercial practice and consisting of (i) the delivery of legal services to persons of limited means or to charitable, religious, civic, community, governmental, and educational organizations in
matters which are designed primarily to address the needs of persons of limited means; (ii) the provision of legal assistance to individuals, groups, or organizations seeking to secure or protect
civil rights,
civil liberties, or public rights; and (iii) the provision of legal assistance to charitable, religious, civic, community, governmental, or educational organizations in
matters in furtherance of their organizational purposes, where the payment of standard legal fees would significantly deplete the organization's economic resources or would be otherwise inappropriate.»
In cases that I've been involved with where an employee or personal relation is believed to have gained access to e-mails and the like
without authority, the police have consistently said that it would be a
civil matter and have turned the complainant away.
Getting the best legal advice
without paying a professional fee for a
civil matter is fiction and most people know it, but don't go anywhere yet.
Remember, under the new Rule 48.14 of the Rules of
Civil Procedure,
matters commenced before January 1, 2012 will be automatically dismissed —
without notice... Read More»
We were created to address the lack of basic legal assistance in
civil matters for those
without the means to hire a private attorney.
The rules of practice and procedure, in
civil matters, of the court in which proceedings are commenced by way of application apply to those proceedings, but where those rules do not provide for the proceedings to be heard and determined
without delay and in a summary way, the court may give such directions as it considers necessary in order to so provide.
The
civil courts do, however, have the equivalent of s 31, in that if appropriate action is not taken before bringing a claim, to give the defendant an opportunity to resolve the matter without litigation, this is likely to have adverse costs consequences under the Civil Procedure R
civil courts do, however, have the equivalent of s 31, in that if appropriate action is not taken before bringing a claim, to give the defendant an opportunity to resolve the
matter without litigation, this is likely to have adverse costs consequences under the
Civil Procedure R
Civil Procedure Rules.
The ability of a party to proceed
without an attorney in prosecuting or defending a
civil action is largely a
matter of state law, and may vary depending on the court and the positions of the parties.