Sentences with phrase «civil wrong done to»

When people can not afford to challenge a civil wrong done to them, then society as a whole suffers greatly and the rule of law diminishes.

Not exact matches

ah If you want to do something that is considered wrong by some group, just declare it a civil right

So if that is the case, why do I have such a humanitarian heart, compassion to those that are even of evil doing, forgiving to those who do wrongs against me, and why is my conversations on issues in my life with Christ the utmost civil and peaceful?

So we're going to try to pull back on this, and I don't think it's wrong or mean or insensitive to civil rights or human rights.

It may be that Maggie Gallagher is wrong to contend that gay marriage will weaken marriage overall, but surely that does not make people like her into «homophobic» activists out to «deny gay and lesbian couples basic civil rights.»

While his nonviolent protests did bring about the Civil Rights movement and led to ending the wrongs of Segregation, one of the unintended consequences of such has produced Black hoodlums across America, many of whom have the idea they do not have to obey the laws of the land because their ancestors were slaves.

You sound just like the people in the dark ages did when they were against civil rights for African Americans and women, you're the one on the wrong side of the moral debate with no facts to back yourselves up.

Others are suffering simply for being in the wrong place at the wrong time, being caught up in civil wars that use religion to define nationalism — much like our favorite Godwin's law reference did.

No matter what one might be doing wrong, everyone general would like to be treated with respect, to be listened and understood, to be given the benefit of the doubt in their motives, to be spoken to in civil discussion as another human being.

I think there's much that's good in your article but would like to ask some questions: first, you say at bullet point # 5, «This argument is wrong, because (a) important benefits obtain in marriage, which do not in civil partnerships».

«If people don't know what you're doing, they don't know what you're doing wrong,» Sir Humphrey Appleby once said - but civil servants will soon have fewer places to hide.

PR NEWSWIRE — Jan 17 — A survey, released by Chemistry.com, reveals 84 % of Americans agree there's nothing wrong with premarital sex, 72 % of singles agree that gay people fall in love the same way straight people do, 79 % believes that gay people should have the right to find a meaningful relationship and 74 % endorse the idea of gay marriage or civil unions.

In those cases, he bucked the system and was proven to be a hero for it; «Civil War» presents a scenario where his individualism is not inherently the right approach, and may even be the wrong thing to do.

Don't get me wrong, I LOVED Civil War, but it's also one of the heaviest films emotionally, and working through it is a journey to take.

While Goodreads, with a membership of 20 million users, may feel that censoring what it feels to be genuine responses to books would be wrong, Athena and the other moderators do propose solutions to at least keep the site civil and supportive of readers.

While I do mention the Revolution being little more than a pretty backdrop in my own review, and somewhat lament that we never get to be more integral in its events like Connor was in the civil war that took place, ultimately there's nothing wrong with such an approach.

The strategy is to divide conservative candidates and moderate voters; framing conservatives as standing on the morally wrong side of the climate change issue; as they have been portrayed in the gay marriage and Civil Rights debates.9 The NextGen campaign applies a master narrative that is adapted to each state, emphasizing that climate change poses a serious threat to the economy, public health, and children, and that if a candidate doesn't believe in climate change, they can't be trusted.

It seems clear to me that DeChristopher did the right thing in peaceably engaging in civil disobedience to halt a destructive process that he knew was wrong.

You may be unsure of how to handle this civil asset forfeiture, especially if you did not do anything wrong.

So we could, in theory, create criminal penalties to take the place of civil wrongs, and spend much more on criminal prosecutions of those wrongs as they do elsewhere.

Its perspective is summed up well in the front - page picture of a smiling, anthropomorphic piece of toast popping out of snarling toaster and proclaiming, «If loving civil justice is wrong, I don't want to be right!»

Unlike criminal law, in which things are simply wrong and people doing them will face consequences if caught, in civil law the outcomes are far too malleable to be coherent.

The Pop Tort makes the wild claim that if the civil justice system is so wrong, they don't want to be right.

Lawyers still can't create the facts that amount to the civil wrong — for example, if you know that some place is not properly maintained, suggest that somebody would do well to have a slip and fall there — but, if they see some problem likely to have injured unknown people, they can now advertise the fact that the wrong exists and troll for clients to make it worthwhile for the lawyers to sue.