All of
them claim God or gods are still actively involved in the lives of people and events that transpire in this world.
Not exact matches
Would you accept the same
claim being made for another
god, that someone had faith in their being real, and that
god sent a sign proving his
or her existence
It won't save you, because the
god science promotes, «nothing», never said anything
or claimed to have made anything.
We don't dig up the bones of «heretics» either the way some did in the Dark Ages who held grip on the people, ruled over them by fear, and
claimed they had authority of
God, holding keys to heaven
or hell in their possession, making people hostages by their lies... I think you have a lots of things mixed up in your mind friend!
Most self - described atheists are Agnostic Atheists who do not believe in
Gods, but also do not make epistemological
claims about
God's existence (
or lack thereof).
Hardly, after man came up with then disregarded as utter nonsense the previous 10,000
or so
gods in existence, we decided not to jump on the current bandwagon
claiming salvation for the believer and damnation for the rest... Pray tell, what became of all the people who had never the chance to hear of his words / deeds after he came and died?
Whether that's through
God's Word, through prayer
or through the encouragements of others around you, staking your
claim as a child of
God not only pushes the enemy back, but takes you closer to
God.
You speak as if you have done so yourself...
or have you accepted at face value what Dawkins and many others
claim: that there is no evidence of
God?
If the Muslims
claimed their
God was the right one,
or the Mormons
claimed their
God was the right one,
or the Hindus
claimed their
gods were the true
gods, would it be convincing to you if they said — «Look around!
Religions incorporated and codified these basic social values and skills, and quickly learned to take credit for them — as if, without the religion, we would be doomed to not have them — although we see them in every human society, including hunter - gather tribes with no sense of
gods as we understand them After many centuries of religious domination, enforced through pain of death, ostracization
or other social sanctions, allowing religion to take credit, as well as failing to question other religious
claims — has become a cultural habit.
I am not
claiming moral equivalence between murder and accidents
or murder and «acts of
god», ie nature.
Who is more believable, person A
claiming Jesus did a few miracles requireing very little relative energy from a vast creator
God,
or person B that
claims «nothing» knew what to do to make all the matter in existence all at once....
Marion expresses the theocentric understanding of man that he finds in St. Augustine: «Speaking to
God, as the confessing praise does, implies first of all turning one's face to
God so that he can come over me,
claim me, and call me starting from himself, well beyond what I could say, predict,
or predicate of him starting from myself alone.»
In the absence of
God or as some
claim that there is no
God then Good and evil become relative
or subject to the culture and time.
Not that we are fit (qualified and sufficient in ability) of ourselves to form personal judgments
or to
claim or count anything as coming from us, but our power and ability and sufficiency are from
God.
Nick, arrogance in the extreme is
claiming to understand
God's motives, reasons & justifications
or personifying him with human emotions like jealousy, vanity & vengance... Between athiests & believers, who do you think does this?
Without this evidencial support, any
claim regarding knowledge of that
gods» intentions, actions
or desires is not valid and must be dismissed as fiction.
Coronations of monarchs were important religious ceremonies because their religious legitimation of particular political rulers expressed Christendom's fundamental
claim that the empire's (
or nation's) authority and unity was ordained by
God.
For example: «Is the
claim that an omnipotent
God made man out of dirt retarded
or not?»
This testimony about Jesus as only a son of David (2 Samuel 7:12 - 14 NIV) who was punished by
God with the floggings of men for claiming to be god thus becoming the «bright morning star» (Isa.14: 9 - 20) was revealed through the Bible by Maestro Evangelista in http://www.thename.ph which proves he is the «angel» or messenger sent by Jesus to deliver his testimony or HIS ADMISSION that he is not a son of God and as the «bright morning star «to all churches (or believers of Jesus) thus nullifying the «antichrist» lie made by the apostle Jo
God with the floggings of men for
claiming to be
god thus becoming the «bright morning star» (Isa.14: 9 - 20) was revealed through the Bible by Maestro Evangelista in http://www.thename.ph which proves he is the «angel» or messenger sent by Jesus to deliver his testimony or HIS ADMISSION that he is not a son of God and as the «bright morning star «to all churches (or believers of Jesus) thus nullifying the «antichrist» lie made by the apostle Jo
god thus becoming the «bright morning star» (Isa.14: 9 - 20) was revealed through the Bible by Maestro Evangelista in http://www.thename.ph which proves he is the «angel»
or messenger sent by Jesus to deliver his testimony
or HIS ADMISSION that he is not a son of
God and as the «bright morning star «to all churches (or believers of Jesus) thus nullifying the «antichrist» lie made by the apostle Jo
God and as the «bright morning star «to all churches (
or believers of Jesus) thus nullifying the «antichrist» lie made by the apostle John.
Pantheism is the
claim that
God is all there is
or that all is
God.
Also, I have never, implicitly
or explicitly,
claimed to be a
god — that would be totally inconsistent with believing there are no
gods, and a straw man
claim made by believers when they can not prove their own delusions.
Or are you no different from those that
claim God is real but offers no evidence?
Had Christ not been invented, you would simply be
claiming that I owe something to Mithras
or Odin
or Osiris
or some indigenous
god.
you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool
or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of
God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you
claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.
@fimeilleur actually i can back up the
claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed
God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject H
God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw
God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject H
God and spoke with Him, not the
god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject H
god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the
God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject H
God who has created all things, the
God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject H
God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of
God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject H
God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution
or evilution there are areas
God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject H
God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that
God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject H
God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.
You said, «But I do know you have no evidence AT ALL to support your
claims against
God or Christianity.
As an intellectual convert to the faith, it seemed obvious to him that since Christian theology
claims the one
God of all as its object, it is either universal knowledge
or it is false.
And those that don't say that stuff instead opting to argue and dissect and article
or argument for / about
god doesn't show they make any positive
claims to the existence of such a being, but instead to show how ridiculous and irrational somethings are.
Any person
claiming to be a Christian (especially a preacher) who, unqualified, tries to badly interpret the Word of
God to you
or to the world is calld a «false prophet».
So instead we should let the «self - appointed» people who
claim to be too smart to practice religion
or believe in
God tell us what to do?
In any case, if someone walked into our lives
claiming god told them this
or that today, what would we think about such a person?
Dilemma... a difficult situation
or problem... where you
claim to want
God to prove himself, but don't believe him, and he won't prove himself until you actually believe him, for real.
I only trust
God, not anyone who
claims they know what
God has in store for you as long as you follow THEIR plan
or way of believing, the true path to
God is spiritual and not Religious.
She doesn't
claim to have seen
God,
claim to have spoken to
God,
or even
claim to have known
God better than any of the patients.
Because many of you
claimed you're atheists yet you know what
God means to you also know bibles since many of you DID read it and know
God and Jesus therefore you're not atheist but truly are agnostic because you all WANT proof that if
God is existed
or not..
Again, if you disagree with this, prove the only thing that makes gravity stick to a 9.8 constant is
god keeping his finger on the button and back it up with evidence,
or else you're just making baseless
claims and still gettting angry at other people for backing up their
claims with hard evidence when you can not.
You do comprehend that all Atheist means is without a belief in a
god or gods, right??? I'm not the one
claiming a
god and given that you refuse to answer any questions, it is rather safe to say you're lying about all you
claim.
Sorry to break it to you but, you don't have any
claiming rights to
God or God's love.
So you either have a direct line with
god (as most christians
claim)
or have died and resurrected somehow since you're so assertive with your statement.
I lack a belief in a
god or gods because there is simply NO empirical evidence to support such a
claim — for YOUR version
or anyone else's.
Each side sends out as many gullible followers as they can find
or buy and they send them to an agreed upon place where they bash eachothers heads in and stab at eachother with spears and arrows and eventually only a few survivors will wander back to their masters covered in blood and wounds and
claim Truth for their side, since whichever side won was obviously
God's chosen ones...
Those who
CLAIM to talk to a god or diety and those who claim their chosen diety talks to them are DESERVING of ridi
CLAIM to talk to a
god or diety and those who
claim their chosen diety talks to them are DESERVING of ridi
claim their chosen diety talks to them are DESERVING of ridicule.
Yes, it could be the ultimate» Divine Comedy» in which the potentate is lying, it could be fict i tious mythology,
or it could be that which it
claims to be: the word of
God.
To not only
claim to know there is a
God but to
claim you know his name and how he wants all his slave humans to behave is beyond hubris, it is self deification,
claiming to know the mind of
God, regardless of whether you rely on some ancient book for that knowledge
or not.
I've heard some Christians
claim that their decision to forego an abortion that's for a woman's health,
or kicking their gay kid out of the house were the product of prayer, that these were «hard answers», but still ones that required obedience because they came from
God.
It is
claimed that
God finished his work and no longer has prophets
or gives revelation.
I don't see any
claim that mercy is the greatest attribute
or is essential to
God, nor am I aware of any place where Aquinas asserted that mercy is of
God's essence.
Before you suggested I either believed in your
god or don't so why should I
claim is an evil monster and therefore should not make comments about same, is that correct?
Claiming god (s) exist is exactly the same as claiming Pink Unicorns exist, or the Easter Bunny, or Santa, or any other mythical c
Claiming god (s) exist is exactly the same as
claiming Pink Unicorns exist, or the Easter Bunny, or Santa, or any other mythical c
claiming Pink Unicorns exist,
or the Easter Bunny,
or Santa,
or any other mythical creature.