Such an account would make liberalism analogous to Marx's
claim about capitalism: Liberalism is inherently unstable and is structurally disposed to generate the very forces that destroy it.
Not exact matches
Now there's no doubt that something has, indeed, gone badly wrong with
capitalism in the recent economic cycle, but we hasten to add that stocks are not only a
claim on one year or one cycle of cash flows, but are
claims on a stream of future deliverable cash flows with an effective duration of
about 50 years.
The news also did a story awhile ago
about defectors from America, now living in North Korea, who
claimed to escape
capitalism.
Tomasi tries to deflect worries
about capitalism in practice by
claiming the high ground of ideal theory: the philosophical choice between free market fairness and its alternatives ultimately rests not on empirical and feasibility concerns, but rather on which vision of justice is most compelling at a moral level.
And in addition, think
about all the wasted energy the «climate community» spent mitigating the impact of «deniers,» when «skeptics» could have helped out by listening more carefully to the «climate community,» and trying to understand «the climate community's» arguments, and adding to progress on increasing our understanding of the causes of climate variability and change — rather than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions
about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at Climate Etc. who falsely
claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy
capitalism.