Sentences with phrase «claim about the glaciers»

Professor Murari Lal, who oversaw the chapter on glaciers in the IPCC report, said he would recommend that the claim about glaciers be dropped: «If Hasnain says officially that he never asserted this, or that it is a wrong presumption, than I will recommend that the assertion about Himalayan glaciers be removed from future IPCC assessments.»

Like its claims about the glaciers, this was also based on an unpublished report which had not been subject to scientific scrutiny — indeed several experts warned the IPCC not to rely on it.

Not exact matches

Head of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Rajendra Pachauri's position is looking increasingly untenable with the revelation that he sat on the discovery that one of the IPCC's claims about melting glaciers was without foundation before the Copenhagen summit.

But as occurred in the Himalayan glacier incident, the erroneous claim remains in the about - to - be released report.

The source document, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2007 Fourth Assessment Report (AR4), has been under harsh scrutiny over the past weeks for a number of blunders, including the Climategate scandal, bogus claims about Himalayan glacier melt, false assertions The Netherlands are drowning, deceptive hysteria over conditions in the Amazon, exaggerations of vanishing polar ice caps, and fraudulent cover - up of Chinese temperature data.

Even if you claim that is a result rather a cause of falling temperatures, the fact that it is rising quickly means you don't have to worry about glaciers in London or New York quite just yet.

In addition, having been to Glacier National Park in the 1990s and having read in the National Park Service Brochure that there weren't any glaciers in this area during the Medieval Warming Period and then reading Alarmist stories about how these glaciers «will be lost forever» made me cynical about their claims.

There is nothing in the Working Group I report that supports the Working Group II claims about the disappearance of Himalayan glaciers by 2035; or to support the other assertion about the glaciers declining from 500,000 to 100,000 km2 by the year 2035.

Professor Graham Cogley, a glacier expert at Trent University in Canada, who began to raise doubts in scientific circles last year, said the claim multiplies the rate at which glaciers have been seen to melt by a factor of about 25.

Since the IPCC issued its Fourth Assessment Report in 2007, questions have been raised about the claim that the Himalayan glaciers would disappear by 2035.

All the «facts» about melting glaciers, dramatically rising sea levels, and other claims by the GW crowd have been refuted.

Climate scientists had refused to reveal their data or show their workings, and several alarming claims about climate change, such as the rapid melting of Himalayan glaciers, were found to be groundless.

After it was forced to retract its claim about melting glaciers, Mr. Pachauri dismissed the error as a one - off.

The President made these remarks before the scandalous «Climategate» emails were made public, and headline - grabbing claims about melting glaciers, burning Amazon rainforests and disappearing African agriculture were shown to be mere speculation and exaggeration from climate activists.

Buff's response (end of article below) to informed critique of his policies are not unlike those of Pachauri's response to scientists that rubbished IPCC claims about Himalayan glacier melt.

If you want intelligent discussion and claim to have read so much literature, it is rather surprising you make such claims about «thermal activity», and «Antarctic glaciers advance».

Glaciologists are this week arguing over how a highly contentious claim about the speed at which glaciers are melting came to be included in the latest report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

The peer review process broke down, and very dubious (and, indeed, plagiarized) claims were published about the likelihood of the Himalayan glaciers vanishing, due to climate change, by the year 2035.

«The chairman of the leading climate change watchdog was informed that claims about melting Himalayan glaciers were false before the Copenhagen summit, The Times has learnt.

Q: There is a view which feels that you knew about the glacier melting and of your claims at IPCC melting away before Copenhagen.

Pachauri, who led the compilation of some 2,000 of the world's top climate scientists for 13 years, worked to tighten up the credibility of the reports that guide policymakers and survived a scandal five years ago over exaggerated claims about the speed of glaciers retreating.

Britain protests over false melting glacier claims «Britain has officially expressed its concern to the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) about lax scientific procedures used by the body which supplies the world with the facts about global warming.»

How dare they talk about glaciers in the 1850's (um, see Skeptical Science), or that «impacts claimed by the IPCC to be likely in the distant future are claimed to be already evident.»