Sentences with phrase «claim against will»

We can also help you to challenge a will or trust and we act for trustees, administrators and executors to navigate probate or defend a claim against a will or a trust.

You also know that a liability claim against them won't deplete the coverage available under your policy.

You also know that a liability claim against them won't deplete the coverage available under your policy.

Not exact matches

The SEC will litigate its claims against Balwani in federal district court in the Northern District of California.

Anyone who wants to find out more will not have a paper trail to follow since Schroeder agreed not to «initiate against Tim Hortons any dispute, complaint, action, claim, suit, statement of claim, demand or proceeding whatsoever.»

At a Veterans» Day event this morning, Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore again denied claims that he had been sexually involved with a 14 - year - old girl when he was in his early thirties, and reiterated that he will not step down from his Alabama race against Democrat Doug Jones.

«Credit to the team at Amazon for creating a lot of excitement in this space,» Pichai said, while claiming that Google Home will be considerably superior in its «far - field voice recognition» (ability to decipher speech against background noise at different distances), its integrations with other smart - home systems like Google - owned Nest, and its aptitude to understand and manage things like restaurant reservations, travel itineraries, and contact lists.

The countersuit continues to claim that Mueller reached up Swift's skirt and with purpose groped an «intimate part of her body in an inappropriate manner, against her will, and without her permission.»

Under a judge's order, GM is shielded from legal claims from before it emerged from bankruptcy in 2009, and company officials wouldn't say Thursday whether they will use that protection against death and injury lawsuits.

While many states are so - called at - will states, where employers can terminate freely for all sorts of reasons, anyone who has ever hired and fired knows you need a full paper trail documenting poor performance to shield yourself against a host of workplace - discrimination or wrongful - termination claims.

It's too early to tell how things will shake out, but I can assure you that my colleagues at Time Inc have no problem speaking out against incorrect claims.

Customers who claim it will be able to play Pokemon Go without having the game's data usage count against their monthly allowance through the end of August 2017.

In statements on Thursday, American spokesman Matt Miller said, «We will continue to defend against the claims, which we believe are without merit,» while Delta spokesman Morgan Durrant said, «The simple fact is that Delta has not engaged in any illegal behavior.»

United spokeswoman Erin Benson said the airline will continue to defend against the claims, which it said are without merit.

Portis won't reveal exactly how much he lost through these alleged misdeeds, but among the assets in his 2015 bankruptcy filings he included a $ 1 million note from Ahmed's firm as well as «potential» claims of $ 2 million and $ 8 million against Brahmbhatt's and Rubin's firms, respectively.

Our philosophy is to work closely with a customer to resolve issues if they are encountered, however we will also strongly defend ourselves against claims that are unjust or lack merit.

However, there is a catch — while these financial advisors were made ERISA fiduciaries on June 9, the DOL won't «pursue claims against fiduciaries who are working diligently and in good faith to comply with the fiduciary duty rule and exemptions» until January 1, 2018.

In a statement, Sanofi said, «We strongly believe these allegations have no merit, and will defend against these claims.»

If we terminate Mr. Drexler's employment without cause or he terminates his employment with good reason, Mr. Drexler will be entitled to receive (i) a payment of his earned but unpaid annual base salary through the termination date, any accrued vacation pay and any un-reimbursed expenses, and (ii) subject to Mr. Drexler's execution of a valid general release and waiver of claims against us, as well as his compliance with the non-competition, non-solicitation and confidential information restrictions described below, (a) a payment equal to his annual base salary and target cash incentive award, one - half of such payment to be paid on the first business day that is six (6) months and one (1) day following the termination date and the remaining one - half of such payment to be paid in six equal monthly installments commencing on the first business day of the seventh calendar month following the termination date, (b) a payment equal to the product of (x) the last annual cash incentive award Mr. Drexler received prior to the termination date and (y) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days of service completed by Mr. Drexler in the year of termination and the denominator of which is 365, such amount to be paid on the first business day that is six (6) months and one (1) day following the termination date, and (c) the immediate vesting of such portion of unvested restricted shares and stock options as provided and pursuant to the terms of the relevant grant agreements under our 2003 Equity Incentive Plan.

This will help avoid claims of a conclusion being trumped up against an employee because of hostility by the investigator toward the accused.

Not only will it help you serve your clients and show your professionalism; it may be your best defense against fallacious legal claims.

Real estate groups have come out against the changes, claiming the new rules will hurt homeowners and homeownership levels.

there is a serious risk that China will be tempted to retaliate against U.S. tariffs imposed as result of U.S. claims of intellectual property infringements by China.

I'm sure there are plenty of Christians who are still willing to go against their Lord's teachings and attack people they claim are their God's enemies when in fact they really are their own enemies and they are just using their Gods name to mask their vile hatred and wicked hearts.

RELEASE AND LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY: By participating in any Aberdeen Group survey, entrants agree that Aberdeen Group and any other applicable sponsor, and its parents, affiliates, subsidiaries, representatives, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, advertising, public relations, promotional, fulfillment and marketing, web site providers, web masters, Aberdeen Group and their respective officers, directors, employees, representatives, and agents (The «Released Entities»), will have no liability whatsoever for, and shall be held harmless by entrants against any liability for any injuries, losses or damages of any kind to persons, including personal injury or death, or property resulting in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, from acceptance, possession, misuse or use of a prize, entry, or participation in any survey contests or in any survey contest related activity, or any claims based on publicity rights, defamation or invasion of privacy, or merchandise delivery.

It is one thing to offend by speaking truth, that'll happen, but any other type of offence is unnecessary and against the teachings (which show God's heart on the matter) in scripture for those who claim to «know Him».

The woman claims to be Catholic yet condones fornication, contraception, and probably other things like abortion which the Catholic Church clearly states are against the faith (and teaches that they are, serious, mortal sins that unrepeated of before death, will put one to hell).

Unless major players in the main universities begin to favor our efforts during the next decade or so, we won't be able to honestly claim to be making a much of a dent against the current trends.

Two comments.One, the atheist / materialist claims that he / she... «Did «nt believe in free will»... O.K.Should we take that to mean some mindless, heretofore unknown force apllied those words in your behalf?Did someone put the proverbial «gun to your head «and force you to post your comments?we await you presumably forced answer with bated breath.Two.As for Mr.Gingrich, beware.Politics aside, the one question yet remains for Calista: How did you, a professed «devout «Roman Catholic, carry on a 6 - year affair with a man you knew was married?How does that square with the Biblical prohibition against committing adultery?Oh wait!I know!As a «devout «Roman Catholic you can sin with impunity; just go to your priest, say a couple of «hail Marys and Our Fathers», ask the priest to bless your sinning, and resume.Of course!I had forgetton how easily Catholics excuse their trangressions (ex opere operato, anyone).

The «discernment letter» written by the six of them that night in Dallas, Texas will go down as one of the most ungodly acts against a woman done by men who claim to be of God, progressive, pro-feminist, Christianity 21.

Victims of clerical sexual abuse will find it easier to bring compensation claims against the Catholic Church after a judge ruled it can be held responsible for the wrongdoings of its priests.

A gay priest prevented from working as a hospital chaplain after marrying his partner will learn the outcome of an Appeal Court challenge over his claim he was discriminated against.

I have been struggling with this question for several years now, and while I am not ready to claim I have a «solution» (nothing but pride would make such a claim), I do have a theological hypothesis which will be tested against Scripture.

However, even if successful they will never be able to claim ultimate victory in their war against the poor unless we fall into the trap of looking at history through the policymakers» distorted lenses.»

@End, True, I wouldn't claim to know that religion won't be classified as a mental illness on those grounds, but it would be so inconsistent were that to happen that, barring political agendas, I would imagine that the field would reel from such an obvious bias against one particular type of delusion while ignoring so many others.

You guys can claim this and that, but at the end of the day, this mess will be used against Christians.

If, then, they claim, debates about the propriety of particular wars are begun by stating a general presumption against war, this will be to skew the debate and to misrepresent the tradition.

They will make false claims like the bible claims the earth is flat, and twist your own words against you.

For example, the World Bank advises against providing aid to developing countries, arguing that the pressures of poverty will force them to build «the market solutions» which it claims are the only effective answer.

You will rant and rave against the truth, claim others are insane or delusional, and this shows there isn't any fruit at your location.

In fact, it seems fair to say that the most common criticism process theists level against the God of classical free will theism is the claim that if such a being really existed and were wholly good, we should expect to see displays of divine coercive power more often.

He said «I have some claims against some merchants; they will come to me in the evening; I will go and give them my orders.

The actual sermon will be the effort we make — the tactics we employ to set over against the negations, whether they be conscious and articulate or unconscious and weary — the powers, claims, promises, and gifts of the Christian gospel.

Hence, while I believe that Griffin has every right to maintain that free - will theodicies are implausible and to encourage us to agree, I see no reason why I, or any other FWT, needs to admit (at least on the basis of anything that Griffin has argued) that FWTs can not defend themselves successfully against the claim that free - will theism «can not provide a plausible theodicy.»

In such education scientific knowledge and engineering skill will be taught not as means of making good the claims of the autonomous human will against nature, but as resources for the informed pursuit of the good.

And yes certainly Mary's heart breaking at Jesus challenging authority that claimed he was casting demons out by the power of Belzebub saying anyone who blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven.

Read a few of the links that come up and then tell me how logical it is that the very group who claims to be so liberal, and so against conservatives, will favour a far more conservative group (Muslims) over a not nearly as conservative group (Christians).

I'll ask again about all those biology textbooks you claimed had warnings against mixing the digestive and reproductive systems.

I am willing to accept at face value the Benham's claims that in their professional capacity they do not discriminate against anyone.

You won't though because they'll say no, claim you are discriminating against them, and you guys will cave to them like you have been for a decade now.