Sentences with phrase «claim author rights»

Not exact matches

For the sake of consistency, we need to realize that Amazon is now effectively claiming the right — and perhaps the obligation — to vet every author prior to agreeing to sell his or her book.

The author of the article claimed that by sharing the paper, Gomez had deprived him of «economic and related rights.»

If the author can't even get that right, you can't trust anything this author claims.

What religiously insecure people like this author cant grasp is that we just don't need a group of collective fools claiming some divine right to humanity.

The author (right or wrong) is making claims against something specific in the bible.

I confirm that no part of the Content violates or will violate, or will infringe, any trademark, trade name, contract, agreement, copyright (whether common law or statutory), patent, literary, artistic, music, dramatic, personal, private, civil, property, privacy or publicity right or «moral rights of authors» or any other right of any person or entity, and shall not give rise to a claim of slander or libel.

Moral rights as stated in section 6 is not accompanied with some number of years hence the author of the literary work has the sole moral right to claim authorship of the work.

It's also a bit amusing to see you, aka publishers, bleeding from hundreds, maybe thousands of little cuts that self - pub authors have inflicted, and one pretty big one from Amazon (so Hachette claims), still wading right into the shark pool.

She also had a relationship with the German author and playwright Christa Winsloe, claiming «the right to love.»

While no one argues the clear benefits to Google's efforts, especially in terms of book access for the underserved literary demographics and those whose impairments prevent them from enjoying the same textual access that other readers have, the Authors Guild fought the effort claiming copyright infringement, especially in terms of the estates of previous rights» holders.

B. Upon receiving notice of any claim, demand, action or suit or other legal proceeding alleging facts inconsistent with or contrary to any of the warranties or representations, Expert Subjects, LLC shall have the right to withhold any sums payable to the Author or Author's Representative as security for the payment of the Author's potential obligations.

The big question is would I trust a Christian pastor who consistantly rips off other sites for information when he's claiming to be a successful author in his own right?

In March, Chin rejected a settlement calling for Google to pay $ 125 million to resolve outstanding copyright claims and to establish an independent «Book Rights Registry» which would provide sales and advertising revenue to authors and publishers.

Impermissible Uses.You understand that you may not: • modify, adapt or hack the Service or modify another website so as to falsely claim or imply that it is associated with the Service, AuthorMarketingClub.com, AMC, Author Marketing Club or any other AMC service; • reproduce, duplicate, copy, sell, resell or exploit any portion (including, without limitation, the contents of the AMC email or similar notification, the look and feel of the AMC website, and the contents of the web pages of the Service, use the Service or access the Service without the express written permission of Author Marketing Club; • verbally, physically, or otherwise abuse (including threats of abuse or retribution) any AMC member or AMC employee, agent or officer; • upload, post, host, or transmit unsolicited email, SMSs, or spam messages; • transmit worms or viruses or any code of a destructive nature; • as a Reader Member, utilize the information provided in a Query other than to provide a relevant response to a Specific Query posted by a Author Member; • violate any applicable federal, state or local laws or regulations; or, • plagiarize, violate or otherwise infringe upon the trademark, copyright, patent, trade secret, or any other rights of any person, firm or entity, expressly including but not limited to libel, slander or invasion of rights of privacy, publicity or «moral rights».

Even Joe Konrath, as high - profile a proponent of the revolution in publishing as I know of, claims only that for many authors paper is becoming a subsidiary right, like foreign language or film rights (note that Konrath first blogged about this almost four years ago.

Most of the authors claim to be experts in this field making it even more challenging to make the right choice of books.

The two things that Judith claimed, in her utterly dishonest critique of that paper, are mentioned before the thing that she dishonestly told you that the authors had claimed was the sole cause of the «hiatus in warming» when they clearly said «partially,» also right in the Abstract.

Right off the bat, a most surprising conclusion in this paper is that the authors claim that correlation proves cause.

2205 (2011)[U.S. Supreme Ct.]; author — Justice Kagan: «But for» test applies when determining whether a prevailing defendant should recover fees in a plaintiff's civil rights suit involving both frivolous and nonfrivolous claims, rejecting the district court's use of a «focus» test.

@Upnorth There used to be a residual right of the true authors of a work to claim a copyright in cases where a work for hire copyright expired due to failure to renew.

Except for an action brought for a violation of the rights of the author under section 106A (a), and subject to the provisions of subsection (b), no civil action for infringement of the copyright in any United States work shall be instituted until preregistration or registration of the copyright claim has been made in accordance with this title.

The tortious interference with prospective advantage claim was preempted by Section 301 of the Copyright Act as it was solely based on the author's right to prevent unlawful interference of her right to manufacture, distribute, and publish Rocky.

Like feudal lords of yore, legal publishers (authors or creators claim only their moral rights) stake their rights to past, present and future rents in kind and specie.

He argued that it was the plaintiffs who were the authors of the missed limitation period when they did not seek legal advice about their rights in a negligence claim in a timely fashion, notwithstanding having been advised by Cardill to do so.

Furthermore, these findings endorse our previous hypothesis, according to which the FR's authors suggested that the adoption of the Italian Constitutional Court's line of thinking remains the only viable solution for the safeguarding of the interested individuals» right to an effective remedy and the adjudication of their claims» merits.