Not exact matches
A
former Westpac financial planner castigated
by the royal commission for ripping off
clients claims he has been made a scapegoat
by the ban...
The publicity - seeking Staten Island lawyer who once asked a judge to let him settle a legal battle with another attorney using «trial
by combat» is now suing «bitter»
former clients and people he
claims he had business dealings with — for $ 10 million.
And it was a
former madam who
claims to have had Eliot Spitzer as a
client, a little - known lawyer, and a perennial candidate and karate expert who struck the most memorable lines of the night at the debate at Hofstra University on Long Island, which was hosted
by Newsday and News Channel 12.
They include an infamous bounty hunter who always brings his quarry in alive (Kurt Russell); his current «
client,» a foul - mouthed lady gangster (Jennifer Jason Leigh); a proud and decrepit ex-Confederate general (Bruce Dern) searching for his lost son; a black Union officer who's also turned to the bounty hunting game (Samuel L. Jackson); a
former rebel raider who
claims to be the new sheriff at the closest town (Walton Goggins); a prissy British hangman (Tim Roth); a near - silent cow puncher (Michael Madsen); and Bob (Demián Bichir), a mysterious Mexican almost completely hidden
by his coat, hat and beard.
[Draftsman turns to Mr Z: «If you are a
former client of a lawyer who holds, or whose firm holds, confidential information of yours which might reasonably be expected to be material where an issue arises between you and another
client of that firm, you can apply to the High Court
by claim (Civil Procedure Rules 1998 Pt 8); or
by application in any court proceedings in which the question arises... etc»].
Defended a
former shipbuilding
client and a
former aluminum industry
client in Oregon against NRD
claims by NOAA, DOI and state and tribal trustees;
LAWPRO defended a
claim brought
by a
former client who sued her lawyer for failing to prevent her from entering into a final separation agreement before receiving full disclosure from the other party.
Recent matters include successfully defending a mesothelioma
claim made
by a
former employee of the
client, and acting for Markerstudy in the successful dismissal of personal injury
claims that were found to be fundamentally dishonest.
Successfully defended a regional law firm
by obtaining an immediate dismissal of a
claim brought
by a
former client.
Recently, Orr & Brown obtained a jury verdict of over $ 500,000.00 on behalf of a local business
client in a case involving complex legal issues, defeated a
claim brought
by a large materials supplier that a
former corporate officer was personally liable for the debt of a defunct corporation based on a signed personal guaranty, and successfully negotiated a high - profile «business divorce» between 2 owners of a very lucrative and profitable North Georgia business.
Recent highlights include defending international testing services provider ALS Global in a # 1m dilapidations
claim brought
by its
former landlord's successor following the
client's exit from a site in Runcorn.
Often, brokers may only notify the current insurer, understandably not being aware of old policies which might respond to a particular
claim, placed or effected
by a
client's
former broker.
Richard was trained
by a
former insurance defense attorney so he has intimate knowledge of how insurance companies evaluate
claims, and uses that knowledge against them the ensure his
clients get the maximum compensation.
We advised in connection with a
claim being made against our
client by the liquidators of his
former consulting company for recovery of alleged director's loan account and in respect of a potential
claim for professional negligence against his
former accountants who mis - advised him in respect of his and the company's personal and corporation tax liabilities.
HYPO # 5: A
client filed a grievance against me, and is
claiming that my $ 15,000 flat fee to defend a small business owner against a lawsuit
by a
former employee was unreasonable when I managed to resolve the case with a letter and a couple of phone calls.
Claims were made against Karim Solicitors by former clients for the return of misappropriated money; the ARP sought a declaration that it was not obliged to indemnify Karim Solicitors on the basis that these claims arose out of dishonesty and / or fraud committed or condoned by all three of the K
Claims were made against Karim Solicitors
by former clients for the return of misappropriated money; the ARP sought a declaration that it was not obliged to indemnify Karim Solicitors on the basis that these
claims arose out of dishonesty and / or fraud committed or condoned by all three of the K
claims arose out of dishonesty and / or fraud committed or condoned
by all three of the Karims.
The decision, handed down in October 2013, held that state statutes and rules regulating an attorney's disclosure of
client confidences were not pre-empted
by the False
Claims Act and that the
former general counsel's decision to «spill his guts and freely disclose Unilab's confidential information» went well beyond anything that was authorized under the crime / fraud exception of the New York Rules of Professional Conduct.
When Rogers» Bob Shaw sat down with the CFO of the company to discuss insurance options, the
client mentioned an uncovered
claim at their Montreal - based facility that was denied
by their insurer and unchallenged
by their
former broker.
When Rogers» Bob Shaw sat down with the CFO of the company to discuss insurance options, the
client mentioned an uncovered
claim at one of their Manufacturing Facilities that was denied
by their insurer and unchallenged
by their
former broker.
A federal bankruptcy court has discharged
claims for debts against a real estate salesperson made
by a
former client despite misrepresentations made
by the practitioner.
Both registrants / brokers took their
former clients to court over commissions
claimed by both registrants / brokerages within the terms of the holdover clause six month time periods that the plaintiffs were unaware of.
A federal bankruptcy court considered whether it could discharge
claims made against him
by a
former client related to a misrepresentation made
by the real estate professional.