Not exact matches
Artificial Life In the mid-1990s, Craig Venter rose to fame
by claiming that he and his colleagues would decipher the human genome long before a huge team of
government scientists would.
Local officials
claim this is proof that the
government's environmental preservation efforts have been successful, but recent research
by climate
scientists suggests a more worrying explanation for rising water levels: not only is climate change thought to be responsible for increased rainfall and snowfall in the area, it has also caused,
by some estimates, up to a fifth of the permafrost which covers 80 % of the plateau to melt.
Government bureaucrat «
scientists» guarantee themselves lifetime employment
by claiming CO2 is going to cause a climate catastrophe... that only they can see coming... and only they are qualified to study.
To illustrate this, could you imagine if during the effort to convince the U.S.
government to embark on the Manhattan Project, the word «physics» was hardly ever used
by the advocates of atom bomb development (who were simply known in this alternate reality as «nuclear *
scientists *»), to such an extent that many well - placed non-physicists didn't even realize that the
claims of destructive power were based on it?
Meanwhile, the Arctic ice sheet is expanding quickly, debunking
claims by «
scientists» parroted in «news» outlets such as the
government - funded BBC about the Arctic being «ice - free»
by the summer of 2013.
In another recent interview with David Archibald of the Institute of World Politics Mr Jones quoted approvingly Mr Archibald's «sadness as a
scientist... that our scientific institutions», including the CSIRO, the Bureau of Meteorology and many universities, «have failed in their duty to serve and protect the Australian people»
by claiming that global warming is real only because «they want the money, they keep being funded
by the
government and they tell the
government what they want to hear».
Remember this, next time you hear people
claiming that climate
scientists are only in it for the money, or that environmentalists are trying to create a communist world
government: these ideas were devised and broadcast
by energy companies.
That propagandists funded
by grants from idiot
governments cheat true science and make quite false
claims as to cause is just evidence of mass corruption and that most
scientists have become part of the court monarch's plan to solidify and expand political power.
These fake «concerned citizens»
claim to be worried about a conspiracy
by governments and
scientists to raise taxes and restrict their freedoms in the name of tackling a non-existent issue.
Government - funded
scientists, the Green's anti-CO2 activists and the mainstream media - alarmists have all
claimed that the current drought being suffered
by the US west coast is the extreme climate change Americans have never experienced before.
He has been widely criticised
by green campaigners after he
claimed that the much shorter «summary for policymakers» — hammered out in all - night sessions between
scientists and
government officials over a week - long meeting in Yokohama, Japan — was overly «alarmist.»
The mechanisms such interests use are many — influencing election outcomes
by injecting huge sums of money into them (see the NYT editorial on the KOch Brothers and AB32, for example), installing fossil fuel employees in
government bureaucracies (BP's ex-chief
scientist is currently Head of Science at the DOE, one Steve Koonin, also of Caltech — welcome to the fossil fuel - academic complex), and distorting science to fit their agenda (witness the endless fraudulent
claims about zero - emission combustion, despite the persistent absence of any stand - alone prototypes.)
But a new study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and being highlighted
by New
Scientist, contends that at least in the case of tropical forests, those owned
by local communities have been protected far better than those managed
by government: The study,
claimed to be the first of its kind, was done
by Ashwini Chhatre and Arun Agrawal from the University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign and examined what's happened to 80 forests in 10 countries worldwide over the past 15 years — only 10 % of which were owned
by forest communities themselves.
By «actual state of science,» he meant the imploding claims and forecasts made by UN panels and government - funded alarmist «scientists» — many of whom were exposed in the ClimateGate scandal conspiring to «hide the decline» in temperatures, censor climate heretics, and violate Freedom of Information law
By «actual state of science,» he meant the imploding
claims and forecasts made
by UN panels and government - funded alarmist «scientists» — many of whom were exposed in the ClimateGate scandal conspiring to «hide the decline» in temperatures, censor climate heretics, and violate Freedom of Information law
by UN panels and
government - funded alarmist «
scientists» — many of whom were exposed in the ClimateGate scandal conspiring to «hide the decline» in temperatures, censor climate heretics, and violate Freedom of Information laws.