Sentences with phrase «claim costs paid»

It can result in huge insurance claim costs paid by your insurer and consequently, your premiums going up.

It can result in huge insurance claim costs paid by your insurer and consequently, your premiums going up.

Not exact matches

Again, the cost of litigation is at least as great as the claims paid out, so make sure the legal defense costs coverage is ample.

In 2008, Express Scripts paid $ 9.3 million to settle a suit by New York and 28 other states that claimed it deceptively inflated costs for state employees, in part by secretly switching to higher - cost drugs, and that it allegedly pocketed millions in manufacturer rebates.

a downgrade in the Company's claims - paying and financial strength ratings could adversely impact the Company's business volumes, adversely impact the Company's ability to access the capital markets and increase the Company's borrowing costs;

In the event that you are able to demonstrate that the costs of Arbitration will be prohibitive as compared to the costs of litigation, NBCUniversal will pay as much of your filing and hearing fees in connection with the Arbitration as the Arbitrator deems necessary to prevent the arbitration from being cost - prohibitive, regardless of the outcome of the Arbitration, unless the Arbitrator determines that your claim (s) were frivolous or asserted in bad faith;

He said the company failed to properly pay his taxes on his behalf, made unauthorised loans, and overpaid for «security and other services,» costing him «tens of millions of dollars» and leading to financial trouble, of which he claims to have only become aware of in March of last year.

The case stems from an April 2016 sale of 75 CSeries jets to Delta Air Lines Inc. (dal) Boeing claims Delta paid $ 20 million per plane, well below an estimated cost of $ 33 million and what Bombardier charges in Canada.

But instead of Apple paying for the cost of those advertisements, the tech giant instead required those carriers to foot the bill, the report claims.

Attorneys for McDonald's workers have filed class action suits in three states claiming that the company was responsible for illegally withholding wages in a number of ways, including calling people in but not paying them for all the time they were required to be in stores as well as charging for the costs of uniforms.

«It could cost a company more to qualify a product and do all the paperwork to claim NAFTA then the one or two per cent they pay in [WTO] duties.

It urged avoidance of deals that are managed by a paid promoter, involve land acquired within the past 36 months, and claim deductions of more than 2.5 times the property's acquisition cost.

Healthcare providers prefer to be paid upfront to avoid the expensive process of chasing after claims and unpaid medical bills and you're only paying for your doctor's time instead of the insurance company's flat rate, which includes its own administrative costs as well.

In 1985, the most recent year for which statistics are available, employers paid $ 21 billion in compensation claims, excluding administrative and litigation costs, compared with $ 5 billion a decade earlier.

This excludes the policyholder and their household, who would need to file a health insurance claim to cover the medical costs associated with an injury or pay out of their own funds.

Senate Health Committee Chairman Lamar Alexander and Sen. Susan Collins, Maine Republican, have partnered with Democrats on bills that would reel in rate hikes by resuming reimbursements for insurers who pick up low - income customers costs on the Obamacare exchanges and freeing up billions for a «reinsurance» program that blunts the cost of customers with big claims, so others don't have to pay more.

Higher costs from the lawsuits this year would be reflected in rates for reinsurance — which is insurance that insurance companies must buy to ensure they can pay claims after a catastrophe — by June 1 of next year, he said.

Important factors that may affect the Company's business and operations and that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to, increased competition; the Company's ability to maintain, extend and expand its reputation and brand image; the Company's ability to differentiate its products from other brands; the consolidation of retail customers; the Company's ability to predict, identify and interpret changes in consumer preferences and demand; the Company's ability to drive revenue growth in its key product categories, increase its market share, or add products; an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill or other indefinite - lived intangible assets; volatility in commodity, energy and other input costs; changes in the Company's management team or other key personnel; the Company's inability to realize the anticipated benefits from the Company's cost savings initiatives; changes in relationships with significant customers and suppliers; execution of the Company's international expansion strategy; changes in laws and regulations; legal claims or other regulatory enforcement actions; product recalls or product liability claims; unanticipated business disruptions; failure to successfully integrate the Company; the Company's ability to complete or realize the benefits from potential and completed acquisitions, alliances, divestitures or joint ventures; economic and political conditions in the nations in which the Company operates; the volatility of capital markets; increased pension, labor and people - related expenses; volatility in the market value of all or a portion of the derivatives that the Company uses; exchange rate fluctuations; disruptions in information technology networks and systems; the Company's inability to protect intellectual property rights; impacts of natural events in the locations in which the Company or its customers, suppliers or regulators operate; the Company's indebtedness and ability to pay such indebtedness; the Company's dividend payments on its Series A Preferred Stock; tax law changes or interpretations; pricing actions; and other factors.

Important factors that may affect the Company's business and operations and that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to, operating in a highly competitive industry; changes in the retail landscape or the loss of key retail customers; the Company's ability to maintain, extend and expand its reputation and brand image; the impacts of the Company's international operations; the Company's ability to leverage its brand value; the Company's ability to predict, identify and interpret changes in consumer preferences and demand; the Company's ability to drive revenue growth in its key product categories, increase its market share, or add products; an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill or other indefinite - lived intangible assets; volatility in commodity, energy and other input costs; changes in the Company's management team or other key personnel; the Company's ability to realize the anticipated benefits from its cost savings initiatives; changes in relationships with significant customers and suppliers; the execution of the Company's international expansion strategy; tax law changes or interpretations; legal claims or other regulatory enforcement actions; product recalls or product liability claims; unanticipated business disruptions; the Company's ability to complete or realize the benefits from potential and completed acquisitions, alliances, divestitures or joint ventures; economic and political conditions in the United States and in various other nations in which we operate; the volatility of capital markets; increased pension, labor and people - related expenses; volatility in the market value of all or a portion of the derivatives we use; exchange rate fluctuations; risks associated with information technology and systems, including service interruptions, misappropriation of data or breaches of security; the Company's ability to protect intellectual property rights; impacts of natural events in the locations in which we or the Company's customers, suppliers or regulators operate; the Company's indebtedness and ability to pay such indebtedness; the Company's ownership structure; the impact of future sales of its common stock in the public markets; the Company's ability to continue to pay a regular dividend; changes in laws and regulations; restatements of the Company's consolidated financial statements; and other factors.

Important factors that may affect the Company's business and operations and that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to, increased competition; the Company's ability to maintain, extend and expand its reputation and brand image; the Company's ability to differentiate its products from other brands; the consolidation of retail customers; the Company's ability to predict, identify and interpret changes in consumer preferences and demand; the Company's ability to drive revenue growth in its key product categories, increase its market share or add products; an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill or other indefinite - lived intangible assets; volatility in commodity, energy and other input costs; changes in the Company's management team or other key personnel; the Company's inability to realize the anticipated benefits from the Company's cost savings initiatives; changes in relationships with significant customers and suppliers; execution of the Company's international expansion strategy; changes in laws and regulations; legal claims or other regulatory enforcement actions; product recalls or product liability claims; unanticipated business disruptions; failure to successfully integrate the business and operations of the Company in the expected time frame; the Company's ability to complete or realize the benefits from potential and completed acquisitions, alliances, divestitures or joint ventures; economic and political conditions in the nations in which the Company operates; the volatility of capital markets; increased pension, labor and people - related expenses; volatility in the market value of all or a portion of the derivatives that the Company uses; exchange rate fluctuations; risks associated with information technology and systems, including service interruptions, misappropriation of data or breaches of security; the Company's inability to protect intellectual property rights; impacts of natural events in the locations in which the Company or its customers, suppliers or regulators operate; the Company's indebtedness and ability to pay such indebtedness; tax law changes or interpretations; and other factors.

The premier claimed Imperial Metals» reclamation bond could pay for the cleanup costs, but four full days after the disaster she wasn't able to provide any facts about how much was being held in bond for tailings cleanup or when it would be used.

British supermarket chain Tesco is facing legal claims that it is paying women less than men for work of equal value, in a case that lawyers estimate could ultimately cost it as much as 4 billion pounds ($ 5.6 billion) in compensation payments.

Our cost estimates are based on claims for medical and dental services paid for by private insurance plans, including the country's largest insurers.

But when it claims that the «free» contraceptive coverage can be afforded by the insurer because «cost - savings» will result from «improvements in women's health and fewer childbirths,» the administration is admitting that the contraception is already being paid for by the employer, if its policy covers childbirth and women's health in general.

My friends who buy from an insurance company are constantly battling to have their claims paid... Then there are the people who get dropped when they start costing the insurance companies too much.

I do not claim to have this all figured out, but I seek the Lord and pray and realise what a cost the Lord paid so that I will not go to Hell for adultery and every sin I have committed.

Earlier this month, the BBC claimed Sir Cliff Richard has spent «grossly unreasonable» amounts of money of court costs - money the corporation could be liable to pay if it loses the legal battle.

In June»98 a U.S. District Court in Maryland threw out the suit in summary judgment, ordering Antonious to pay Spalding's court costs and issuing a $ 30,000 sanction against Stroup's law firm, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, for failing to do an adequate prefiling investigation of Antonious's claims.

The Mirror report claims Wanyama will likely cost Arsenal around # 15million, though Wenger may well be willing to pay up considering he is a proven Premier League performer now.

The report also talks about the cost of the move and claims that the price that Arsenal will pay for the player is going to be around # 10 million more than the # 25 million that the early Arsenal transfer rumours said that his Spanish La Liga club were ready to accept.

SEE ALSO: Arsenal v Chelsea tickets cost desperate fans # 950 Arsenal fans attacked me with coins claims ex-Spurs boss Arsenal & Liverpool willing to pay # 22m for Argentine forward

The Spanish giants have told Liverpool that Benzema would cost them # 38.8 m and that is apparently a price the Merseyside outfit are willing to pay, hence this source claiming that the Premier League side are «closing in» on a deal to snap up the former Lyon man.

You shall further fully indemnify and keep Car Throttle fully indemnified against any costs, claim, demand, action, damages, loss and / or expense (including but not limited to any direct, indirect or consequential losses, loss of profit, loss of reputation and all interest penalties, legal costs and any other reasonable costs and expenses suffered or incurred by Car Throttle) arising directly or indirectly from any breach or non-performance by you of this Agreement and you shall pay all such costs, claim, demand, action, damages, loss and / or expense forthwith on demand by Car Throttle.

Also, if I was working and we were paying for childcare, we could claim that cost and reduce our tax burden (you can pay for childcare with pretax dollars.)

We bill insurance for you and promptly reimburse your costs, per the terms of your insurance contract, once insurance pays your claim.

You hereby indemnify Sleep Lady Solutions, LLC and undertake to keep Sleep Lady Solutions, LLC indemnified against any losses, damages, costs, liabilities and expenses (including without limitation legal expenses and any amounts paid by Sleep Lady Solutions, LLC to a third party in settlement of a claim or dispute on the advice of the legal advisers of Sleep Lady Solutions, LLC,) incurred or suffered by Sleep Lady Solutions, LLC arising out of any breach by you of any provision of these terms and conditions, or arising out of any claim that you have breached any provision of these terms and conditions.

If your insurance company covers the cost of a class, you generally pay the teacher upfront and submit a claim to your insurance company after the class is complete.

iii) Professional subscriptions: an employer may agree to pay or reimburse the cost of membership to one professional body but not to others, even though the nature of the employment may require the employee to retain multiple memberships Again, the employee may make claim additional relief.

All workers should have the right to claim a deduction for the expenses incurred while fulfilling their work obligations, particularly where the employer chooses to pay a taxable cash allowance to cover employee expenses or where reimbursement is otherwise limited for cost control reasons.»

Tribunal fees are paid, by definition, by those who have either left their jobs or are in a workplace which they find difficult to work in; therefore the fact that the costs of these tribunals is so high means it is even more difficult for mistreated employees to take action because they are likely to be claiming jobseekers» allowance.

Inez Barron also opposed the measure, claiming that «profit, hedge - fund operated and other entities that choose to establish private educational institutions» should pay all their own costs.

I'm also confused by the Governor's reasoning claiming this would transfer an obligation to state taxpayers to pay for this cost.

(Posted 24 December 2011) Significant current scandals, and those yet to come In no particular order Top salaries and bonuses - boardroom and shareholder individual responsibility The multiple between top and average pay Lawyers fees - the cost of the legal process Medical negligence claims against the NHS Care and treatment in the NHS «No win, no fee» personal injury compensation Democracy and the voting system Lords reform Political party funding The domestic energy market and pricing The Tax system and its inefficiencies and complexities Subsidies for new energy generation schemes The amount of crime fuelled by Drugs The availability of drugs in prison.

The lawsuit, which is being filed by a lawyer representing former staff members, claimed in the two years before closing, the hospital also paid $ 17 million for «management consultants,» $ 3.8 million on «professional fund - raising» and $ 104 million on unspecified costs.

The cheapest new plan I found was 3x what I used to pay, and I've only made one claim in the last three years and it was denied (routine bloodwork, cost me $ 3800 on top of my monthly premiums).

Hayward responded to the claims in the letter by defending the raises to his staff, saying they hadn't received raises for several years, and that they were paying much more than state workers do in health care costs.

If PRI had gone bankrupt, the state would have had to pay its remaining claims, with the cost passed on to home, auto, and business insurance customers statewide.

«As he noted, I have already apologised unreservedly and have offered to pay back half of the costs I claimed for this property over the period for which it was also used by my constituency agent.»

Staff representatives on company boards are no alternative to stronger pay claims, especially as living costs rise.

But the NUT claims the pay award is below inflation, arguing recent pay rises have been wiped out by the rising cost of living.