Sentences with phrase «claim god exists»

You are making the claim God exists so therefore you have to prove such a claim otherwise what do I have to go by to believe you?

@Chad «if you claim God does not exist, you shoulder a burden of proof If you merely claim you do nt believe God exists, you do nt have that burden If I claim God exists, I have a burden»

You won't find any god believers who claim a god exists but it doesn't care about the earth or humans..

It appears you are unhappy with our right to believe as Americans... I don't wish you any harm, but you must realize that over 80 % of Americans claim God exists and that they are quite content without a belif in ape brothers and fossile sisters.

Just because you can claim God exists is not a reason for me to believe it.

You claim this god exists, prove it!

The Theist makes the claim a god exists, an Atheist merely disagrees.

Adam, Christians are claiming god exists - it is on Christians to prove it.

Counter, it is believers that claim that gods exist and that they have proof.

By that, I mean the sort of evidence that would convince you if someone claimed THEIR god existed.

Claiming a god exists is absolutely a positive statement of false knowledge, but saying we can't know, don't know, and that we as an individual don't have enough evidence to make a positive statement on any gods existance, that's a rational position to take.

Unlike pure faith belief claiming God exists or God doesn't exist, this position is more like the reasoning that an antibiotic will work or not based on the empirical evidence of it previously working or not working in a given situation.

Not exact matches

Now, before I go any further I believe god falls into the same claims that santa, the easter bunny and other imaginary creatures that exist.

But one doesn't have to believe no gods exist to recognise and expose theistic claims as indefensible.»

You CAN NOT prove God exists so to claim that God couldn't exist is foolish.

Crazy theists claim this thingy «God» has always existed.

There is ample evidence for the existence of God, what you decide to do with this evidence is ultimately up to you, but do not claim that there is none... and I would submit to you that many people believe many things without evidence every single day... but do not lump all people of faith into one basket... I have personal proof that God exists, but proof for me may not be proof for you, some people can see something with their own eyes and still deny it, that is why I said it is ultimately up to you to decide what you believe... there is much evidence both for and against the existence of God, you need to decide which evidence you choose to believe...

You have not established that your God exists, and thus, you can not make claims as to actions and effects of that God.

Quite a stretch there, devin, to go from «we can't understand god» to your claimed belief that such a being exists.

And I note that Chad continues to claim there is scientific evidence that proves his god exists but has not provided anything that even remotely backs up his blather.

You said, «It is not sufficient to show objectively that God does not exist,» I don't claim to show that gods don't exist.

Christians have been claiming this for centuries and it's still untrue because your god doesn't exist.

You are the one who made the claim that God does not exist.

I do claim there is no abrahamic god, the one from the bible, because the bible is a known fraud and collection of myths and lies, and that seems to be christianity's only «proof» the abrahamic god exists.

present the evidence you claim exists for god.

Because many of you claimed you're atheists yet you know what God means to you also know bibles since many of you DID read it and know God and Jesus therefore you're not atheist but truly are agnostic because you all WANT proof that if God is existed or not..

So your an Atheist, because most atheists don't claim that «a God does nt exist» most use there is no god and other terms as tools to troll wiGod does nt exist» most use there is no god and other terms as tools to troll wigod and other terms as tools to troll with.

You are claiming to «know» without doubt that God exists.

You have claimed that non-believers must disprove god, but you have recently modified that to «if a person says «God does not exist», they must back that up with evidence.&raqgod, but you have recently modified that to «if a person says «God does not exist», they must back that up with evidence.&raqGod does not exist», they must back that up with evidence.»

What we don't know is if the god hypothesis is correct, and likely not, so claiming some «god» had something to do with it... pointless until you can show this «god» of yours to exist... until then, it is baseless belief.

I never claimed that God didn't exist, did I?

A more correct argument would be this: Christians claim that man exists because of god.

Most Christians don't understand how others might see it as hate when they make the claim that their heaven & heII exists and that those not invited to heaven are going to go to heII to be tormented and tortured for eternity and the only way to salvation is to accept their God as your Lord and Savior... They think to themselves that they are just trying to help by condemning those they dislike and who don't worship the same way they do, but that doesn't change it from what it is, «hate filled».

Claiming god (s) exist is exactly the same as claiming Pink Unicorns exist, or the Easter Bunny, or Santa, or any other mythical cClaiming god (s) exist is exactly the same as claiming Pink Unicorns exist, or the Easter Bunny, or Santa, or any other mythical cclaiming Pink Unicorns exist, or the Easter Bunny, or Santa, or any other mythical creature.

When it is satisfied, «gods do not exist» will then be a claim that requires proof.

Stephen Hawking makes the claim that nothing could have existed before it, therefore a god could not have created it.

Atheists claim that god exists because of man.

You are the one claiming that a god exists when in fact it takes faith to believe that and faith defined is belief without evidence.

Kumail is actually an agnostic, claiming not to know whether God exists, but contemptuously spitting out the word «Pakistan» in a climactic confrontation with his father, where he lays out his refusal to pretend to inhabit Pakistan whilst living in Chicago.

the statement «gods exist» is a positive claim.

the statement «gods do not exist» is a negative claim that only responds to the positive one.

And if God does not exist how can anyone claim a Non-belief in something that doesn't exist.

However, what I do in fact claim is this: I don't believe that any god or gods — as we are familiar with them in conventional religions — exist.

You have no evidence to support your claim that any god exists or that the supernatural events of the bible ever happend.

@Kenrick Benjamin: «Vic - Don't worry atheist will tell you that they are ignorant as to whence the came and yet still claim that God don't exist.»

You said, «Your claims that Christian beliefs are unreasonable are based on what, to you, is the fact that there is no evidence that God exists.

2) The god (s) frequently claimed to exist, as depicted in the various holy books, reflect logical and moral inconsistencies such that they deserve neither deference nor respect.

According to this story, then, the Bible makes it clear one can know God exists and still be disobedient, which contradicts your claim knowing God exists would turn one into an automaton.

And still not one bit of evidence to support the most basic of The Babble's claims, that even just one god exists.

AE Problem is, a great many atheists don't really claim to know for certain that there are no gods anywhere, only that all the claims of gods so far fail to prove that any actually do exist.