Sentences with phrase «claim its support without»

Thus it is a misuse of such a teaching statement to claim its support without having first sought so to interpret it.

Not exact matches

Some dude claiming to be the son of an unproven god, and others believing that and his resurrection, without any supporting evidence is mythology, if not mental illness.

Faith is «Mental acceptance of and confidence in a claim as truth without proof supporting the claim» (Wiktionary).

Without this evidencial support, any claim regarding knowledge of that gods» intentions, actions or desires is not valid and must be dismissed as fiction.

What's more, you make these claims without the first piece of evidence in support.

We're such terrible people for not acquiescing to your superior knowledge, wisdom, and judgement without issuing a demand for evidence in support of your claims.

We don't believe in fantastic claims without supporting evidence.

Claims without support not only are useless but backfire on your message Actually read the Koran and do nt just pretend you have...

his analysis of sundry maxims and «verbal museums» like Bartlett's supports the claim that quoting is a quintessentially human proclivity: «Can one even think without the words of others?»

You haven't done that nor will you attempt them because all what you are capable of is reiterate your empty statement that «God doesn't exist» without any evidence or proof to support your claim.

Let's first go back to the claim you actually made: that all of these field will obviously, if purused without bias, support your particular worldview.

I find that Whitehead's exposition is question - begging and seriously misleading.4 The exposition is misleading insofar as it suggests that belief in either a specific or generic causal nexus is adequately justified by a subject's experience of CE alone and not ultimately by systematic considerations, particularly those related to prehension.5 If Whitehead's theory of perception was intended to stand alone without support from the rest of his system, as Ford suggests (EWM 181 - 182), then I claim that it is insufficiently justified insofar as a part of it, the theory of CE, is inadequately justified.

I agree it IS laughable that anyone would make such a ridiculous claim without any support whatsoever.

«Founded by atheism, claimed by atheism, supported by atheism, and exclusively in the interests of atheism, suppressing without mercy every jot of evidence for the divine existence, and so making a positive rational faith in God wholly impossible, the doctrine of evolution may well be set down as not only a foe to theism, but a foe of the most thoroughgoing sort.»

What is intellectually dishonest is making claims of «fact» in your post without verifiable supporting evidence.

You use archeological and geological evidence to support your claim that a huge wave did rip through the middle east where noah was, the flood story evolved from that but then you have to deal with the issues of a tsunami large enough to reach noah from the indian ocean without destroying the entire world.

It's your loss... you're like a guy on a shuttle on Mars that claims he's going outside without life support just to prove everyone wrong... wonderful, have fun.

You come on threads like these, making claims and pronouncements, and simply telling anyone who disagrees with your position that they are «wrong» without providing a single shred of support.

The religious institutions which formed such people and continued to claim their loyalty took public responsibility in this sense for granted, The churches preached a gospel which supported responsible lives without needing to draw their members deeply into esoteric spiritual disciplines or arcane theological issues.

Consider Ogden's claim in support of what I have suggested we call Whitehead's «neoclassical empiricism» that, «Just as we are never aware of our own existence except as related to the being of others, so our sense that both we and they are important is our sense of the encompassing whole without which such importance could never be» (PP 85, emphasis added).

An inconvenient truth, you have made this claim a number of times without providing any supporting evidence.

To expect others to accept your claim of knowledge without verifiable evidencial support is arrogant.

If the Christian message had been a series of intellectual claims or affirmations, supported by the miracles of Jesus, let us say, as the complete evidence of the truth of these affirmations, then assent to the truth of Christianity would have been simply an act of the rational intellect, satisfied with the evidence thus adduced and subscribing without reserve to the various formulae of affirmation.

I am not claiming that imagery alone can support such non-cognitive elements — courage without belief that courage is appropriate in the situation is something less than courage!

I will never consider it rude to state what the logical conclusion should be according to your attempted deduction, to demand a similarly logical deduction in support of any and all seriously made claims by others, to call out the bullshit when someone fails to do so, or to respond to people behaving like idiots, making idiotic statements or trying to argue without sufficient intellectual abilities, by calling them what they are: idiots.

To make these claims without the presentation of verifiable supporting evidence is intellectually dishonest.

You are claiming absolute knowledge about the subject without the presentation of evidencial support.

It is irrational to claim that «god did it» without evidencial support.

Thousands of gods have been claimed to exist throughout history and Christians themselves dismiss all the others as never having been real, without any evidence to support that position, so why should we be expected to do any differently regarding their god?

In consideration of being permitted to use the Website, You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Non-GMO Project, and / or its officers, directors, employees, partners, contractors, affiliates, subsidiaries, agents, attorneys, web developers, technical support / maintenance providers, distributors, advertisers, licensors, sublicensees, and / or assigns, from any claim or demand, including reasonable attorneys» fees, expert witness fees, and court costs, made by any third party due to or arising out of Content You Post, Your use of the Website, including without limitation, Your participation in any interactive aspect of the Website, Your use of any information provided on or in connection with or obtained from the Website, Your violation of this Agreement, Your breach of any of the representations and warranties contained herein, or Your violation of any rights of another.

we were middle of the table when AW came, we have been no lower than since, not one other team in the prem can claim this, if the criteria by these fickle fans was to only be top one or two, without any regard for winning FA cup, then who would support Fulham?

There were many claims made by «journalists» (I use that term loosely here and equally could have used the term rumour - mongers) about fees, desire of the player to come to Arsenal, willingness of the clubs to sell, etc but without substantiation / proof or any supporting evidence, one would have to question the veracity of these stories.

I can only hope that this attempt is taken more seriously than the largely muted and clearly unsuccessful protests of late last season... although the plane writing escapade brought some much - needed attention to the matter, it failed to resonate with fence - sitters and those who had just recently fell off the Wenger truck... without a big enough showing of support the whole endeavor appeared relatively weak and poorly organized, especially to the major media outlets, whose involvement could have significantly changed what was to follow... but I get it, few wanted to turn on their club, let alone make a public display of their discord... problem is, they are preying on that vulnerability, in fact, their counting on you to keep your thoughts to yourself... who are you to tell these fat cats how to steal your money... they have worked long and hard to pull the wool over your eyes... they even went so far as to pay enormous sums of cash to your once beloved professor to be their corporate spokesmodel so that the whole thing would be more palatable... eventually the club made it appear as if this was simply a relatively small fringe group of highly radicalized supporters, which allowed the pro-Wenger element inside the club hierarchy to claim victory following the FA Cup win... unfortunately what has happened to this club can't be solved by FA Cups or a few players coming in, the very culture of this club needs to be changed and that starts at the top... in order to change the unhealthy and dysfunctional narrative that has absorbed this club we need to remove everyone who presently occupies a position of power... only then can we get back to the business of playing championship caliber football, which should always be the number one priority of this organization... on an important side note, one of the most devastating mistakes made in the final days of this hectic and poorly planned transfer window didn't have to do with the big name players like Sanchez or Lemar, but the fact that they failed to secure Jadon Sancho, who might even start for Dortmund this season... I think they might seriously regret this oversight... instead of spending so much time, energy and manpower pretending that they were desperately trying to make big moves, they once again lost the plot due to their all too familiar tunnel vision

He also claims — without any support — that Perdue is in Big Food's pocket, too, willing «to cater to the food industry lobby against any school meal regulation.»

To quote myself: If you are one of those women who can't seem to offer your «support» without judging other women either directly or passive aggressively, if you do denigrate formula feeding mothers in the name of upholding women who want to breastfeed, if you spread outright lies about formula companies and the product they sell, you are doing nothing but feeding into the hype and exacerbating the anxiety felt by some of the very mothers you claim to express concern for.......

Going a step further, even if the Succinic Acid can be absorbed through your child's skin without causing skin irritation, there is no research to support the claims that it acts as a pain reliever — plenty of internet anecdotes from believing parents, yes, but no randomized controlled trials.

The makers of baby products can slap an «educational» or «developmental» label on their toys without oversight and certainly without any research or evidence to support their claims.

Ministers at the DWP repeatedly claimed that the majority of people on disability living allowance (DLA) were given benefits for life without any supporting medical evidence.

However, the UK Statistics Authority (UKSA) found that the real percentage of claims passed without supporting medical evidence was just 10 %.

The plan also argues the legislature should support controversial elements in the governor's budget proposal, including his plan to let the MTA unilaterally carve out special districts within New York City (without city approval) and claim the property taxes from those districts.

The memorandum of support from the sponsors, Assemblyman Joseph Lentol (D - Brooklyn) and Martin Golden (R - Brooklyn), echoes self - serving but thinly documented industry claims that music and video gaming are, of course, absolutely essential to New York's future, but can't survive without big tax credits:

The government is facing claims from Remain supporting MPs that it is giving itself sweeping powers to change legislation without proper Parliamentary scrutiny.

Without public financing we would not see Council Members with the courage to claim their independence despite receiving support from the REBNY backed PAC.

Britain's military involvement in the Iraq war could not have taken place without Jack Straw's support, the former foreign secretary has claimed.

Cuomo only asking the people to support the cap without any mention of mandate relief is the hamburger bun without the burger and simply fuels the opposition's (they say mandate relief before tax cap) claim that tax cap alone is a big - government scheme to take power away from and defund local towns and school districts and increase the power of the larger state government which created the property tax problem in the first place by passing the mandates which are the biggest property tax drivers and now refuses to change those mandates.

MANHATTAN — A new television ad debuting Wednesday claims St. Vincent's Hospital couldn't have been closed without the support of City Council Speaker Christine Quinn while urging voters to opt for another mayoral candidate.

How can a candidate seriously claim that they had the voice and purported support of a well - known actor like Morgan Freeman without ever having spoken with him?»

The Chief Executive Officer of the Ghana Investment Promotion Center (GIPC), Yofi Grant, has rejected claims that Ghana's economy will be in shambles without the support of the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

Insisting that Labour can still win the election without the need of Liberal Democrat support, he argues: «This is a progressive moment,» claiming «there is no rebellion against collectivism in the country» akin to the late 70s.

You seem to have missed the links that scientifically support the entirety of my claims for RNA - mediated events that link amino acid substitutions to morphological and behavioral phenotypes without the pseudoscientific nonsense of evolutionary theory.