Not exact matches
The Arbitrator (i) shall apply internal laws of the State of New York consistent with the Federal Arbitration Act and applicable statutes of limitations, or, to the extent (if any) that federal law prevails, shall apply the law of the U.S., irrespective of any conflict of law principles; (ii) shall entertain any
motion to dismiss,
motion to strike,
motion for
judgment on the pleadings,
motion for complete or partial
summary judgment,
motion for
summary adjudication, or any other dispositive
motion consistent with New York or federal rules of procedure, as applicable; (iii) shall honor
claims of privilege recognized at law; and (iv) shall have authority to award any form of legal or equitable relief;
«Because there is no genuine dispute of material fact that Sulyma had actual knowledge of the facts comprising
claims I and III, as well as knowledge of the disclosures he alleges were unlawfully inadequate in
claims II and IV, the Court grants defendants»
motion for
summary judgment on those
claims, finding them time - barred,» Cousins wrote in his opinion.
More recently, The Third Circuit, in a case from Pennsylvania, affirmed a school board's
motion for
summary judgment in response to a teacher's
claim that officials violated her free speech rights for terminating her employment over comments she posted
on her blog (Munroe v. Central Bucks School District, 2015).
Here's a closer look at the court's ruling
on the district's and individual defendants»
motion for
summary judgment for Ms. I's
claims.
Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Microsoft Corporation, Electronic Arts Inc., Harmonix Music Systems, Inc., Majesco Entertainment Co., Ubisoft Inc., and Nintendo of America Inc.'s (collectively «Defendants»)
on Plaintiff Richard J. Baker's («Baker»)
claims for infringement pursuant to the Court's ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS»
MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT (D.I. 135) dated January 3, 2017 and filed
on January 4, 2017.
In addition, the Court confirmed that a bonus entitlement
claim can be decided
on a
summary judgment motion.
The Superior Court allowed defendant's
motion to dismiss
on the
claims of negligent infliction of emotional distress and fraud, and later allowed defendant's
motion for
summary judgment on the
claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress and battery.
Both Freeman and the Harbor Schools filed
motions for
summary judgment, arguing that the three year statute of limitations
on all
claims had expired, as the
claims accrued in the spring or summer of 1993 or at the latest in November 1993.
In the absence of expert testimony, there was no triable issue of material fact as to whether a defect in the speed control deactivation switch installed
on a pickup truck was the proximate cause of a fire that damaged a brake shop, a federal court in Mississippi ruled, granting the pickup truck maker's
motions for
summary judgment on the business owner's products liability and negligence
claims (the latter of which was subsumed by the products liability
claim), and
on the punitive damages
claim (Mildemont, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., January 13, 2017, Ozerden, H.).
The plaintiff moved for
summary judgment, but the action was dismissed when the defendant was successful
on the
motion in
claiming that there was no tort for breach of privacy in Ontario.
In 2015, after transfer to the Eastern District of California for trial, he prevailed
on a second
motion for
summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff's remaining
claim for cost recovery under the Polanco Act.
The first surgeon then brought a
motion for
summary judgment on the basis that the plaintiff discovered her
claim prior to January 1, 2004, and as a result, the one - year limitation period established in s. 89 (1) of the Health Professions Procedural Code, S.O. 1991 applied.
On appeal, the plaintiffs argued that it was an error for the court to dismiss their defect and negligence claims because the only grounds to grant the motion for summary judgment relied on the trial court granting the defendant's request to exclude the expert's testimon
On appeal, the plaintiffs argued that it was an error for the court to dismiss their defect and negligence
claims because the only grounds to grant the
motion for
summary judgment relied
on the trial court granting the defendant's request to exclude the expert's testimon
on the trial court granting the defendant's request to exclude the expert's testimony.
The Court held that the
motion judge erred in allowing
summary judgment on the negligence
claim against the Pearlmans where there were issues of material fact whether Samantha knowingly permitted Thomas to operate her car in violation of a provision of G.L. c. 90 and whether that violation was causally related to the accident.
2008)-- Denial of manufacturer defendant's
motion for
summary judgment in cases arising from explosion at facility in Groton, Connecticut
on grounds that there existed genuine issues of fact as to product liability and recklessness counts of case against manufacturer based
on its
claimed failure to account for and disclose relevant safety and storage information of risks involved in the transport and storage of chemical reagent at ambient temperatures.
«It goes without saying that certification has nothing to do with the merits of the
claims that have been made, Deloitte may well prevail when all of the evidence is presented and assessed at trial or
on a
summary judgment motion,» he wrote.
In the most recent case, a lawyer who appeared
on the show had his
claim against the CBC dismissed
on a
motion for
summary judgment.
Drafted
motion for
summary judgment on behalf of component part manufacturer in a products liability case that resulted in voluntary dismissal of the plaintiff's
claims against the manufacturer.
Drafted
motion for
summary judgment on behalf of a product manufacturer involving the economic loss doctrine and statute of limitations issues that resulted in voluntary dismissal of the plaintiff's
claims against the manufacturer.
Drafted
motion for
summary judgment on behalf of grocery store that resulted in voluntary dismissal of the plaintiff's
claims against the store.
Successfully defended [1] against a
summary judgment motion brought by Zuber and Company
on a multi-million dollar personal injury
claim.
Based
on that determination, Brooks Kushman filed a
motion for
summary judgment and
on April 21, 2016, U.S. District Judge Norma L. Shapiro granted the
motion ending all
claims against Ford
on the grounds that the TMC patent did not cover the accused Ford vehicles.
Successfully obtained
summary judgment on securities fraud
claims for defendant; Federal District Court denied plaintiffs»
motion for class certification
The insured brought a
motion for
summary judgment on the basis that the malpractice
claim was statute - barred.
Because our existing case law holds that a property owner does not violate the duty of reasonable care by failing to remove natural accumulations of snow and ice, see Sullivan v. Brookline, 416 Mass. 825, 827 (1994), the judge concluded that, as a matter of law, the plaintiff could not prevail
on his
claims of negligence; therefore, the judge allowed the defendants»
motions for
summary judgment.
Oh, they also based their
motion for
summary judgment on the non-justiciability of plaintiff's
claim — because there was no pending ethics action!
Allstate denies Araujo third - party coverage and brings two
motions for
summary judgment: one to dismiss Fernandes»
claim as against Almeida (based
on a theory of vicarious liability), the other to dismiss Araujo's
claim on the ground she was not entitled to coverage (as she drove the ATV without a proper licence).
Accordingly, the judge granted the
motion for
summary judgment on the issue of punitive damages and left the plaintiff's negligence
claim as the sole remaining issue for trial.
The Year In Review also provides effective strategies to manage workplace harassment via social media, settle WSIB
claims quickly and at minimal cost, as well as details
on when employers can resist
motions for
summary judgment in wrongful dismissal litigation and the most recent legal developments in family status accommodation.
2001): Implemented a strategy to place plaintiff in a catch - 22 with a successful
claim construction
motion to ensure a loss either
on infringement or validity that was followed up with successful
summary judgment motion for invalidity; authored appeal brief to obtain affirmance by CAFC.
Assisted in winning a
motion for
summary judgment on behalf of a local developer facing
claims of construction defects.
On appeal, the ONCA upheld the
summary judgment motion and dismissed the Plaintiff's
claim as being time - barred.
Since joining FLR, Andrea has worked
on numerous pleadings and memoranda involving
motions to dismiss, to compel discovery, and for
summary judgment on issues such as contracts (including personal services contracts), a wide variety of tort - based
claims, punitive damages, privilege and sovereign immunity, insurance coverage, family law, Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, Health Care Quality Improvement Act immunity and peer review, and estates and trusts.
He prevailed at
claim construction and
on motions for
summary judgment to limit customers»
claims of indirect infringement.
In Hoskins v. Co-operators, the insurer brought a
summary judgment motion seeking to dismiss the plaintiff's
claim for post-104 income replacement benefits
on the basis of section 281 (2) of the Insurance Act:
Argued
motion successfully limiting
claims based
on Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins and
summary judgment motion that was eventually granted
on all disparate treatment
claims for the entire collective action.
In August 2015, a California federal court granted Weil's
motion for
summary judgment on behalf of CBS Interactive Inc. (CBSI) in another landmark right of publicity case (Lightbourne) that dismissed all of plaintiff's
claims.
$ 70 million
claim defeated
on motion for
summary judgment.
If this principle is not followed, there is a very real possibility of a trial result that is inconsistent with the result of the
summary judgment motion on essentially the same
claim.
The trial court granted the defendant's
motion for
summary judgment on her failure to warn
claim, and a jury entered a verdict in Merck's favor in October 2011
on the design defect
claim.
The webinar cover the impact recent rulings will have
on: Confidentiality of settlement negotiations Coverage liability Expert evidence at trial Limitation periods
Motions for
summary judgment Motor vehicle liability Property
claims Statutory accident benefits.
However, while writing his reasons, the
motion judge decided to resolve the
motions on a fifth basis: he would grant a notional cross-
motion by the respondents for partial
summary judgment of their
claim for breach of fiduciary duty and order a trial or additional
summary judgment motions to prove victimization, harm and causation of harm, and to quantify the individual respondents» damages, if any.
Students will be assessed
on the basis of two writing assignments, a Markman /
claim construction brief and a
summary judgment motion, and
on an oral argument
on their brief.
The
motions judge dismissed the
claim against one of the defendants
on a
motion for
summary judgment, and subsequently ordered a focussed, hybrid trial to deal with the balance of the
claims.
After certification of the class action, Maple Leaf brought a
summary judgment motion seeking dismissal of certain
claims on the basis that Maple Leaf owed no duty of care to the class.
The district court addressed VEPCO's
motion for
summary judgment on all three
claims.
The court granted
summary judgment on plaintiff's
claim of discriminatory advertising, but denied her
motions regarding refusal to rent due to family status and discrimination in terms and conditions of rental.
The trial court originally granted the representative's
motion for
summary judgment on the misrepresentation
claims, finding that the purchaser could not have justifiably relied
on the representative's statement because the purchaser was a sophisticated party, had inspected the property, and the title report did not mention beach access.
Reiser, Inc. v. Roberts Real Estate (292 A.D. 2d 726)--
claims that broker breached listing agreement based
on extrinsic evidence can not survive the explicit language of the listing agreement granting to broker «full discretion to determine the appropriate marking approach» for the listed properties; broker establishes its entitlement to commission under the listing agreements by introducing uncontroverted evidence that three properties sold as a result of broker's efforts while the listing agreements where in effect; owner's
claims of breach of fiduciary duty fail where owner, builder / developer, did not list all of its properties with broker as broker's duty is limited to protecting its principal's interest only with respect to properties which have been listed with the broker; broker's duty to refrain from taking action adverse to its principal's interests is necessarily tied to the transaction that formed the agency relationship; owner's
claim of fraud in the inducement under one of two listing agreements survives
motion for
summary judgment
The sellers and their broker moved for
summary judgment on the buyer's
claims against them, and the trial court granted their
motion.