Sentences with phrase «claim points only»

Refinance just to take advantage of lower interest rates and you must claim points only in dribs and drabs over the loan's full term — by dividing what you paid in points by the number of monthly payments you will make over the life of the loan.

Not exact matches

According to Creditcards.com, while only 25 percent of U.S. debit cards are currently chip - equipped, and an estimated 12 million point - of - sale terminals still need to be upgraded to support EMV, small businesses accepting antiquated swipe and sign payments are «held 100 % liable for claims of fraud or wrong - doing» according to Finance Magnets.

In other words, it may be true that «the owl of Minerva flies only at night,» but Kierkegaard suspects that the metaphor hides a profoundly dubious claim: that it is possible to reach a stable end - point of reflection from which Minerva's owl can take off, and to which it can later return.

At one point, for example, Carter describes beautifully the creedal portions of the Catholic belief in the sacraments, only to end by claiming that «the entire purpose of the sacraments was to give an outward sign of belief.»

It claims that faith only became possible at a definite point in history in consequence of an event — viz., the event of Christ.

I can not claim to know exactly what each of those scientists / mathematicians believed, only that it is known they believed in some form of a higher power at some point in time.

As neil degrasse tyson pointed out, each of our great mathematicians and scientists throughout the centuries reached their limit and declared God did it... only to have the next guy push though that barrier, reach their own limit... and claim the same... This lady has the benefit of history and science at her finger tips, and judging by her credentials is no stranger to the scientific process, and still fell into the same trap...

Northrop observed such a confluence, and held that Whitehead and Berg - son differed only on one major point of doctrine: he alleges that, for Bergson, spatialization in science constitutes a falsification of experience, while he thinks this is not the case for Whitehead.30 There are two problems with this claim by Northrop.

Though many Calvinists argue that double predestination is the only logical conclusion to the Calvinist position on God's election of some (but not all) to receive eternal life, I am not going to belabor the point or try to refute the idea since most Calvinists claim that they do not teach or believe it... (for more on reprobation and double predestination I recommend this book: Vance: The Other Side of Calvinism, pp, 250 - 333).

The only correction I'm making to anything that Jeremy wrote is to point out that we are not claiming that circles are churches.

The point of all this was that in the event of nationalization of church institutions, the government could claim only so much and no more.

For Revelation in the ultimate resort and in principle claims the whole of reality as the possible subject - matter of its affirmations, even if only sub respectu salutis (in relation to salvation), and from this point of view even events and realities which are accessible to secular experience fall within its material scope.

Though his later theology expressed the point more gently, Barth never retracted his early claim that only a thoroughly eschatological Christianity bears any relationship to Christ.

Please note: we must claim Jesus» message as our focal point not only with our words.

Rutherford was the inspiration for the twentieth - century theologian Francis Schaeffer, who claimed in his Christian Manifesto that «at a certain point there is not only the right, but the duty, to disobey the state.»

I think the point of the cartoon is to point out that, while many churches claim to «welcome all», the welcome toward gay people is only for those in the closet.

The movements are frequently confounded, for it is said that one needs faith to renounce the claim to everything, yea, a stranger thing than this may be heard, when a man laments the loss of his faith, and when one looks at the scale to see where he is, one sees, strangely enough, that he has only reached the point where he should make the infinite movement of resignation.

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

I agree with Bill Maher, but then again I'm a lifelong atheist... I have never believed for one minute that the god as portrayed in the bible or koran has any possibility of being real to everyone, otherwise that god would make itself obvious and not hide behind man made lies and cultural practices that self perpetuate thanks fo fear... otherwise there would not be several thousand man made religions trying to claim that god as their own... yes, it is an opinion, only valid to the opinion holder and no one else... Bill, thanks for so strongly making that point, not that it makes any difference to god fearing people... they will hold on to their opinion as strongly as they hold on to their shotgun, thinking that each provides them with some form of security... to intelligent people, neither is secure and neither leads to true freedom of the mind...

The plaintiffs claimed that the harm they suffered could not be addressed by suing as women only, because GM could point out that it had indeed hired women (white women) prior to 1964 and had retained those that were hired after 1970.

And you only say that kind of thing once someone actually points out your unjustified assertions of it being true, while in the same breath claiming that you only offer opinion?

He also grants the common - sense view that a human corpse is a dead thing as a human body, but he still makes his panpsychistic point by insisting that even a corpse is composed of many living things and, as far as our knowledge runs, nothing else.29 In addition, he claims that his belief that there is only a relative and not an absolute distinction between mind and matter is given support by recent developments in physics that have shown that the differences between matter and various kinds of radiation are differences of degree and not of kind.

Ellis points out that this is not a viable explanation since it claims that a particular level (of reality) is the only real one, whereas causal power exists at every level.

Lest anyone claim that this only has to do with salvation of believers, let me point out the terms «saved» and «perish» (1Cor.

Defenders of classical theism often implicitly use the latter criterion, claiming they have defended their God's failure to prevent horrendous evils by simply pointing out that there might be some reason, knowable only by God, as to why it was good not to intervene.15 I would say, in any case, that it need not be «clear» in a strong sense of the term.

I assume they would explain the essential elements of Paul's point here is that Christ died for sins and was raised — and even in their own interpretation in which they claim this «good news» is only essential for believers — they have enough sense to explain to believers the burial is mentioned as proof of His death, and the witnesses are mentioned as proof of His resurrection.

Because this is the sole ideal that has the solidity once owned by Catholicism and the flexibility that this was never able to have, the only one that can always face the future and does not claim to determine it in any particular and contingent form, the only one that can resist criticism and represent for human society the point around which, in its frequent upheavals, in its continual oscillations, equilibrium is perpetually restored, so that when the question is heard whether liberty will enjoy what is known as the future, the answer must be that it has something better still: it has eternity.29

At one point, Spencer's character claims that the entire Trinity, not only Christ's human nature, suffered on the cross at Calvary — a rank heresy against the doctrine of divine impassibility.

But the point of this claim is not that the Christ is manifest only in Jesus and nowhere else, but that the word addressed to men everywhere, in all the events of their lives, is none other than the word spoken in Jesus and in the preaching and sacraments of the church (ibid., p. 156).

Despite Arsenal's consistency over the last six games, they've only claimed one more point than City over the sequence of games.

Not only do Arsenal have to claim all three points from our next Premier League game, and all of the ones coming up at least until we travel to face the current pace setters Chelsea at the start of February, but the Gunners will be expected to sweep past the EPL strugglers Swansea City without too much trouble.

If you think about the point in the article, it is actually claiming Wilshere will only produce his best, because he is motivated to win a place in the World Cup squad.

Despite the fact that Arsenal go into the next round of games above his old club on points, Dalglish has claimed that we are the only one of the top six teams not to have improved.

If we need evidence to back up such a claim, we only need to go back as recently as the Liverpool game earlier this month where he produced a stunning save to ensure his side picked up a crucial point at Anfield.

At one point he mentioned the position of Arsenal in the Premier League table by saying that there were 17 clubs below the Gunners, but when he spoke about what we need to do to claim the title in May he seemed to think that there was only one team we needed to catch and that is Leicester City.

The worrying fact is that Arsenal only mustered one shot in target during the whole game and that would not normally be enough to have taken a point and if we play in a similar sort of way on Wednesday then I reckon that PSG will take advantage and claim the important top spot in our Champions League group.

According to the Daily Mirror, Cech claimed that Southampton goalkeeper Fraser Forster «robbed» Arsenal of the victory and was the only reason they the two clubs went back to the lockers at Emirates Stadium with one point apiece.

However, a change in defensive approach saw Arsenal not only stand up to Chelsea but look the most likely to claim the points.

«We need two victories so we'll see if we can get them,» claimed the Barca boss with only six points needed to wrap up the title.

Again, they have a legit claim to the # 1 Spot after winning by a clean 40 points on Wednesday Night — but only one team can be # 1... So like Team Gross, they have now have a short term goal to shoot for.

As of writing, the only way Liverpool can do that is to either beat Sevilla in the Europa League Final to secure a Champions League berth, or to beat West Bromwich Albion on Sunday while claiming more points than West Ham United and Southampton.

It appeared to me that a lot of the Gunners out there on the pitch almost believed they only had to turn up to claim the points.

KEY FACT: In Liverpool's only previous PL visit to London Stadium they won 4 - 0 to record their biggest away league victory at West Ham MATCH ODDS: West Ham 4/1 Draw 3/1 Liverpool 8/13 bet365 Pick: Under 4.5 cards 8/13 ANDY SAYS: Easy win for Liverpool here, don't say how West Ham will compete... 0 - 3 GRAEME SAYS: West Ham need to get something I think they might claim a point... 1 - 1 SILKY SAYS: Hard one but I believe that Liverpool will land the win... 1 - 2 FOOTBALLIndex — One to follow: Just under # 2, Mo Salah is a great deal

KEY FACT: Newcastle have lost only two of their last 17 home league meetings with Leicester MATCH ODDS: Newcastle 13/8 Draw 23/10 Leicester 19/10 bet365 Pick: Harry Maguire to score anytime @ 10/1 ANDY SAYS: I will go with Newcastle to just get the three points here, but close..1 - 0 GRAEME SAYS: I can see Newcastle ending their poor run and just doing enough to claim the win... 2 - 1 SILKY SAYS: I believe Leicester will have enough to claim the three points here... 1 - 2 FOOTBALLIndex — One to follow: Jamie Vardy has plummeted to outside the top - 400 and is now just 70p

Brighton and Hove Albion claimed their first away Premier League win at the London Stadium with a 0 - 3 convincing win against West Ham United lifting them to a respectable top half 10th place in the Premier League table, putting them level on points with Newcastle and only two points behind Liverpool, Arsenal and Chelsea.

The former had only made two appearances for the senior team by that point, and it was as the outstanding player in the Reds» Under - 21 title win that he claimed the award.

United had one last great opening to claim all three points right at the death after substitute Cameron Borthwick - Jackson set up Rooney at the far post, only for the striker to miss the target and the chance to relieve the pressure on his under - fire boss, who insisted after that whistle that he would not resign.

Montella's men thought they had claimed a point when keeper Samir Handanovic could only carry Giacomo Bonaventura's 81st - minute shot into his own net, but Icardi's late heroics condemned them to a fourth Serie A defeat of the new campaign which leaves them 10 points adrift of their city rivals.

So Owen Coyle's men have a glorious opportunity here to not only enhance their claims for the Europa League, but to also apply some pressure on one of their main rivals for a top - six finish in Kenny Daglish's Reds, who face a difficult trip to relegation - threatened West Ham the following day and are by no means guaranteed three points.

Slovakia had a chance to equalise in the 64th minute through Tomas Hubocan, but he could only fire a loose ball into the ground and over, with England able to see out the remainder of the game to claim victory and move five points clear at the top of Group F with two games to go.