Sentences with phrase «claim religious views»

The case is about whether a corporation can claim religious views, and if they can impose their will on others.

You claim your religious views should be protected.

Not exact matches

The entrepreneur, Jack Phillips, claimed that participating in such a union would violate his religious views, though a local Colorado court ruled against him 2015.

In March 2009, Coppedge claims that his supervisor advised him that co-workers had complained that he was harassing them over debates about his religious views and coercing them in the workplace into watching DVD programs about intelligent design.

you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.

So is it your view that if people are tortured or killed for their religious beliefs that if one claims to be Christian we are to turn a blind eye to this injustice?

SciGuy, technically Francis Collins is a scientist, but that doesn't make his religious views any less pseudo-scientific B S, nor his religious claims any more substantiated.

It is this false claim made by so many, particularly in more fundamental religious communities, that is being challenged by this simple illustration of the logical fallacy of such a view.

The Bible can't be used to verify claims any more than the Quran or the Book of Mormon, as all religious texts first require a basic belief on the part of the reader that they (the texts) are right in order to be viewed as such.

This is how the typical atheist views the claims of the religious: prove to me that your god exists and then I will believe.

How come some people on here claim to possess a logical and fact based mindset, yet can't explain their point of view without acting hostile and demeaning toward «religious people».

Agnosticism — the view that the truth of certain claims — especially claims about the existence or non-existence of any deity, as well as other religious and metaphysical claims — are unknowable.

With all of God's first born son (s) being an established view among our many religious constabularies, many of one - God religions are dead - set against each others» claims as to which religious convictions are truly the most righteous.

If this intent is successfully realized, it will in part lend support to Hartshorne's claim that the dipolar conception of God is more compatible with religious experience than views which conceive God primarily in terms of the category of the absolute, or pure actuality, or being, etc..

Such explanations are irreconcilable with scientific «naturalism» which rejects teleology, but can be made to fit rather neatly into a religious view, which would then posit a claim to being able to explain the source of this teleological dynamic.

If we conclude that we will not dogmatically refuse even to view religious art, or we find that we are unable to avoid viewing it, and if in viewing it we are grasped by its beauty and witness, then a posteriori we are compelled to grant that such an art makes a claim.

On the basis of scientific realism, so the claim runs, these questions can now be answered more concretely and often more satisfactorily than was possible with the help of the old religious world - views.

Religious liberals, who claim to find God in human experience, should view as significant the two centuries of this American experiment with religious Religious liberals, who claim to find God in human experience, should view as significant the two centuries of this American experiment with religious religious openness.

On the other hand, 14 per cent claimed that their viewing of religious programs was a «substitute for going to church,» and about 20 per cent said that they watched religious programs on Sundays during church hours.

The viewing audience for religious programs is far smaller than has been claimed.

From Variety: «Each episode of the series will tackle a topic from a scientific point of view, dispelling myths, and refuting anti-scientific claims that may be espoused by politicians, religious leaders or titans of industry.»

The views of a visiting pope, respected by Catholics and many non-Catholics alike as a moral and spiritual leader of great prominence, will not make persons now unconcerned about global warming suddenly begin to grow concerned, nor even make skeptics of religious freedom begin to take its claims more seriously.

Agnosticism is the view that the truth values of certain claims — especially claims about the existence or non-existence of any deity, but also other religious and metaphysical claims — are unknown and (so far as can be judged) unknowable.

Agnosticism is the view that the truth values of certain claims — especially claims about the existence or non-existence of any deity, but also other religious and metaphysical claims — are unknown or unknowable.

When first quizzed about his religious views, David Cameron used the old oxymoron of claiming adherence to Christianity while insisting it should be private.

«Given the increasing diversity of our society it would be incredibly disappointing if this progress were to be thrown away simply at the behest of a religious lobby that we now see does not share the views of the people it claims to represent.

The religious studies GCSE caused controversy last November, when three parents took the Department for Education (DfE) to court over the wording of a paragraph in the new subject content, claiming that it «gave unlawful priority to the teaching of religious views as compared to non-religious views, including those of humanism».

The parents also claimed that the combination of the assertion and the content of the GCSE itself gave «unlawful priority to the teaching of religious views as compared to non-religious views», but Mr Justice Warby did not give specific conclusions about this.

He raised a complaint, which in his view was not properly progressed, and he then brought a claim in the Employment Tribunal for harassment and victimisation on the grounds of his religious belief.

One of the biggest challenges facing the Supreme Court of Canada in my view is how to address religious claims.

In our view, it is important to account for historic religious inequities in evaluating the contemporary religious claims of Aboriginal peoples.