Introspection is actually a weaker
claim than intuition since it involves not a total lack of mediation but simply a direct knowledge of the internal world not derived from external observation.
Not exact matches
To that assessment this essay will contribute modestly by arguing (1) that an account of experience must be compatible with the fact that there is no one thing which is what experience is or is the essence of experience, (2) that no philosophically adequate account of what experience is can be established merely by appeal to direct, personal, intuitive experience of one's own experience, (3) that generalization from features found in human experience is not sufficient to justify the
claim that temporality is essential to experience, but (4) that dialectical argument rather
than intuition or generalization is necessary to support the
claim that experience is essentially temporal.
In
claiming for
intuition a higher place
than reason, Iqbal defends revelation, on which all religion is based.
Neville's
claim that Platonism is supported by a religious
intuition of the «irreducible dualism between Form and chaos» (CG 67) in reality is simply unconvincing; every metaphysics acknowledges the contrast between order and disorder, but there is no reason to think that that contrast — as experienced — is any more genuine or vivid for a Platonist
than for an Aristotelian.
On the other hand, some in the financial world believe that
intuition can be useful to identify a good buy, but I don't believe there are any investors
claiming to make decisions without thoroughly conducting the necessary research to confirm that their thinking is more
than just a hunch.