Sentences with phrase «claim the case as»

«Although the administration dodged a bullet, it can't really claim the case as a big victory,» Jeffrey Holmstead, a former EPA official who lobbies for electric utilities with the firm Bracewell & Giuliani, said in a statement cited by the New York Times.

Surprisingly, many insurances try to claim cases as ATC related, even weather issue (due to bad weather ATC gave no - go to airline.)

Not exact matches

In December, the Yukon appeal court sided with the Ross River Dena Council that existing free - entry staking rules conflicted with the constitutional duty to consult aboriginal groups with outstanding land claims, in this case to an area known as the Kaska.

Yieldify CEO Jay Radia said the company does not comment on ongoing legal cases, but slammed Bounce Exchange as a «tyrant» and asserted that Yieldify «will not get bullied by any organisation that brings forward frivolous and unfair claims and misuse legal systems for their advantage.»

They «allege their businesses have been placed at risk due to the cybersecurity incident and generally assert various common law claims such as claims for negligence and breach of contract, as well as, in some cases, statutory claims.»

The new offering, «Watson for Patient Safety,» will gobble up anonymized medical records, claims data, and millions of electronic submissions to the FDA about potential drug side effects (known as individual case safety reports) to see if it can learn about the hidden dangers of medicines before they become too costly.

U.S. District Judge Edward Chen, who is hearing the federal lawsuit, previously said the drivers» claims in the case could amount to as much as $ 1 billion, according to Bloomberg.

Using figures from official European and Catalonian organizations, Business Insider claimed earlier this year that the region would quickly gain about 16 billion euros yearly in the case of a split, as they would no longer have to pay taxes to Spain.

As was the case in ivi, the broadcasters claimed Aereo was operating illegally by retransmitting content without permission.

In no case have there been serious declines in prices as some fear - mongers would claim.

Looking at the S&P Case - Shiller 20 city composite index as a sanity check no your fraudulent claim shows that since 2009 the index has only advanced 20 %, that means that on say a $ 500,000 your home equity due to appreciation would roughly be $ 100,000, so you would have to had put down close to $ 150,000 as a down payment, yet you did this on one income and you have kids and you make only $ 130,000 / year, sorry doesn't add up.

In 1990, the Supreme Court of Canada had created a sophisticated legal test on workplace anti — discrimination claims, but, as the Court acknowledged in Tawney Meiorin's case, this test had proven to be complicated and challenging to use.

The Everglades Club didn't allow Jews or African - Americans as members for a long time, although insiders in Palm Beach claim that is no longer the case.

As the private email exchanges (and, perhaps, «clarifications») were insufficient to fully address Kahan's concerns, in the end Kahan & Peters (2017) elected to publish a formal «reply» paper of their own to make their case against Ballarini & Sloman's 2017 claims about «replication» (or, more specifically, the lack thereof).

The Company records advertising and marketing development fund programs with customers as a reduction to revenue unless it receives an identifiable benefit in exchange for credits claimed by the customer and can reasonably estimate the fair value of the identifiable benefit received, in which case the Company records it as a marketing expense.

And in still other cases, there has been a nondisclosure agreement, such as the one Cohen arranged for porn star Stormy Daniels (née Stephanie Clifford) after she claimed to have had an affair with Trump.

Next, justify why it will be offered to you for free, such as the goodwill of the now - rich creator, beta testing, or some future profit sharing (which applies in this case since they claim that the successful trader will take a cut in the future).

They'll argue that the board's voting agreement means this case must be sent to an arbiter, and are alleging that Benchmark's claims — which relies heavily on media coverage, as opposed to primary documents — will melt away under private scrutiny.

That claim had a particularly special meaning: It was the one claim that required Gawker's insurance company to pay for its defense as well as potential payouts in the case of a settlement.

More provocatively, this unitary standard would also add an employer knowledge requirement in cases based on a disparate impact claim related to customer evaluations, a result possibly «unpalatable to some» as Flake has conceded.

In the case that you pass, the policy beneficiaries should file a claim with the insurer, after which point the circumstances of your death will be reviewed and receive the payout (also called a death benefit or the face value of the policy) so long as everything is in order.

British supermarket chain Tesco is facing legal claims that it is paying women less than men for work of equal value, in a case that lawyers estimate could ultimately cost it as much as 4 billion pounds ($ 5.6 billion) in compensation payments.

Not only do you want to have the correct coverage to protect your business in the case of claim, you want to protect your investor's interests as well.

Albeit in footnotes, but perhaps most significantly, the Coinflip case put the CFTC on record as concluding that Bitcoin, while a commodity, is not a currency.6 In summarizing the facts of the case, the CFTC explained that Bitcoin is «distinct from «real currencies»» of the United States or another country.7 In addition, the CFTC Order in the Coinflip settlement specifically noted that the Bitcoin options were not eligible for the CFTC's «trade option exemption» in CFTC Rule 32.3.8 Since the CFTC's trade option exemption can only be claimed for an option that would result in delivery of an «exempt» or agricultural commodity, this violation in effect serves as the CFTC's finding that it will not treat Bitcoin as a currency.

But she also claimed that «the case has already been won in arbitration» — though, as CNN pointed out, no arbitration decisions were final.

Well it is true that some people seek sorcerers to implement Jinn that are satanic demons into mankind or his house or his business to finish him or make his life miserable or to stop flow of his business income... In such case it is either you are religious enough and say your prayers often then it becomes hard for this to harm you or otherwise you need to find some one who practice exorcism to remove this evil... But many are just pretending to be good at it and help you not but squeeze money out of you with tales and stories... There is another type of possessions and that is not through a sorcerer but directly by coincidence what man is at his weakest moments and those weakest moments for a possessions are when you come through a great fear or when cry or laugh loudly in hysteria, or during a certain moment of mating... or even when sneezing loudly... That's why there are prayers to be said on daily basis to guard you from such things and specially if passing haunted places such as deserted houses but most evil ones are residents of public toilets and market places... Some of them even would claim that you have made a wrong action by which you have killed a dear one to them and for that they have possessed you and that is mostly night time such as throwing a cigaret butt to a dark place or stepping killing an insect or even an animal at night which could have been one of them or possessed by one of them... So this is true thing happening to many who suffer unexplainable illnesses or sufferings which could look like mental illness that comes and goes as pleased...

If all of that water was contained inside the Earth (as many Christian «claim» is the case when they get desperate because the other options clearly don't work), then you wouldn't have been able to walk on the surface because the Earth's crust would have turned into a literal quicksand soup.

Yet even in the case of blood vengeance, biblical law at least keeps the system under the watchful eye of the elders, who arbitrate the claims of the respective parties, just as in the more direct cases of lex talionis.

There is some lovely, poetic material in the Quran, and a few areas of guidance for civilized behavior; but the claims of a supernatural basis for it are in no way substantiated (as is the case also with the Bible).

Muchembled explains both the development of dueling among the nobility and rural revolts against the centralization of authority as reactions against state repression of traditional codes of violence: «In each case, the participants claimed an eminent right to a straight fight, even if it resulted in the death of the adversary.»

In some cases this appeal to inner intuition might take the form of the claim that each of us has a «non-sensuous experience of the self» which is «both prior to our interpretation of our sense - knowledge and more important as source for the more fundamental questions of the meaning of our human experience as human selves» (BRO 75).

(A decision for same - sex marriage by a state could as in the case of Massachusetts, preempts the debate in that state, but it is less far - reaching because it leaves other states to arrive at a different conclusion — unless, as some same - sex - marriage proponents have claimed, other states are required to recognize such marriages under the Constitution's requirement of giving «full faith and credit» to other states» proceedings.)

However, he had decided to check for himself, just in case, before finally dismissing the claims as the old wives tale he was sure they were.

As CT reported five years ago, the case against SGM claimed that the ministry had conspired to cover up abuse within its network.

As tends to be the case, you claim not to be attempting to shut down anyone, but then you proceed to tell us why we need to shut this thing down.

The defamation would be based on specific claims, and as the person bringing the case, he would have to prove they are not true.

Following the review's publication, Bishop Peter Hancock, the Church of England's lead safeguarding bishop, said: «At the heart of this case was a judgment, on the balance of probabilities, as to whether, in the event that her claim for compensation reached trial, a court would have concluded that Carol was abused by Bishop Bell.

The ideological climate is beginning to change and it is possible to make oneself heard through other means and to claim the first victories as in the case of the MAT, a victory which is yet to be confirmed.

Actually, the Catholic Church made a case that their rate of 4 % of their priests were pedos as being in line with the cultural averave for pedophilia (others claim that the Vatican underestimated their true rate).

If this were not the case she would not be strong as you claim she is.

As this case demonstrates, it can also be endangered by exaggerated claims and overreaching.»

As for the ideologists who claim to know the way to a perfectly just society and who «build a case against God in defense of man, on whom can they depend when human activity proves powerless?»

On the other hand, in the legendary cases of «scientific martyrs», such as Giordano Bruno († 1600), the reality was often that they were not tried for their scientific claims, but for other heterodox assertions.

... In Nicaragua there is no systematic practice of forced disappearances, extrajudicial killings or torture — as has been the case with the «friendly» armed forces of El Salvador Nor has the Government practiced elimination of cultural or ethnic groups, as the Administration frequently claims; indeed in this respect, as in most others, Nicaragua's record is by no means so bad as that of Guatemala, whose government the Administration consistently defends.

In Reynolds v. United States (1878), a case rejecting a claim that it was unconstitutional to prosecute Mormons for polygamy, the Supreme Court accepted Jefferson's «wall of separation» letter as the «authoritative» interpretation of the First Amendment.

As distinguished from people holding to pacifism or the «holy war,» people holding to the just war tradition claim to make decisions on the empirically knowable facts of the case.

In spite of the fact that Hartshorne universally posits a strong sense of relativity to account for omniscience (as well as for other reasons), I will argue that even Hartshorne is forced in important specific cases to attenuate his claims for a strong interpretation of divine relativity; one that says God feels in exactitude the experience of others.

I must stress that it is this property of spatial extendedness claimed for the individual occasions which I am taking as the test case for the ability of the Whiteheadian analysis to furnish an account of properties generally regarded as material.

It is not by any means the case with all christians, but some certainly have inadvertently and unknowingly (in most cases) placed church attendance / society / culture / leadership and a particular book (the Bible) on the same level as they God they claim to worship.

There can be no doubt that in the case of sensation for Aristotle one substance is in another just as much and virtually in the same way as it is for Whitehead, despite the latter's claim to the contrary (cf., e.g., PR 79).1