Sentences with phrase «claim the points for»

Any corporate rates must also be the same as the ABN and business cards presented, an individual can not claim points for another ABN or business when using corporate rates.

Assuming the painting doesn't get wrecked, though, whoever plays the final card, or in other words the final touch, gets to flip the painting over to its completed side and claim the points for themselves.

Not exact matches

Trump called this claim a «joke» during a January appearance on Fox & Friends after Sen. Bernie Sanders pointed out the 2012 tweet but he quickly added that, «this is done for the benefit of China, because China does not do anything to help climate change.»

Hundreds of online articles and published books claim to know the secret of success in business, but for the most part, they boil down to the same major points.

Humphrey points to Microsoft, which was born when Bill Gates had the idea for a PC upgrading system that he claimed he could deliver before any code was even written.

For two days, Facebook's CEO stuck to his bland talking points, claimed a degree of ignorance about his company's operations that strains credulity, and made sure to preface every answer with «Senator» or «Congresswoman.»

The company has responded with statements saying that it's not as dependent on drug price increases as critics have claimed; it has also pointed out that while attention has focused on changes in list prices for drugs, those prices don't reflect the actual cost for insurers, governments and other group purchasers, which typically receive discounts that aren't publicly disclosed.

According to Creditcards.com, while only 25 percent of U.S. debit cards are currently chip - equipped, and an estimated 12 million point - of - sale terminals still need to be upgraded to support EMV, small businesses accepting antiquated swipe and sign payments are «held 100 % liable for claims of fraud or wrong - doing» according to Finance Magnets.

Which brings me to an important point: no one is claiming vast scientific rigor for this poll, so consider this list a jumping off point for discussion rather than the final statement on the topic.

(At this point, it's also worth noting that Facebook's claims about the effectiveness of Free Basics as a development tool in India are highly debatable — the vast majority of those who took up the offer were existing Internet users who wanted some free data, and it seems a very small number of genuinely new users actually graduated to the world of paid - for Internet access.

On a recorded call, the head of Gap Inc's investor relations, Jack Calandra, pointed to a «tepid macro environment» for retail and store traffic problems that worsened in April even as he incredulously claimed that Gap is making «good progress» in righting itself.

She points out the discrepancies between the amount of time people claim to spend on work during a week, for example, and the number of hours that studies using time diaries actually show we spend making productive contributions to our jobs.

But the «ethical» claim for the oilsands is a serious stretch — at least if it's supposed to point to a clear difference in moral status.

The last widespread survey (i.e., not the barrage of fickle online polls that appear every Valentine's Day) was by the Society for Human Resource Management in 2005, in which 40 % of people claimed they had dated colleagues at some point during their career.

A few times during the session Kogan made a point of arguing that data audits are essentially useless for catching bad actors — claiming that anyone who wants to misuse data can simply put a copy on a hard drive and «store it under the mattress».

«At one point, Levandowski said that he asked Brian McClendon, who left Google to join Uber, how much Uber would be willing to pay for the Chauffeur team, claiming he wanted to have a market value for the team.»

For example, two Valeant employees were copied on a November 2014 email with an attachment explaining how Philidor employees could bill the highest amount an insurance company was willing to pay by resubmitting rejected claims at different price points.

According to the Guardian report, at that point, CA claimed to have compiled «a massive data pool of 40 + million individuals across the United States — for each of whom we have generated detailed characteristic and trait profiles.»

As the reforms gather steam, a particular point of interest for the housing market is the impact of the proposed new legislation on the mortgage interest deduction (MID), which allows homeowners to claim a tax deduction equal to the amount of interest they paid on their home loan.

There would be no point in claiming a few Satoshi if it takes 5 - 6 minutes for you to do so.

Why did the CFIB use the year 2000 as a starting point? In another example of selecting statistics to fashion your claims, they chose 2000 because that was a recent relative low point for municipal spending.

Among the evidence that would shift our expectations in this regard would be: material equity market deterioration, further weakness in regional Fed and purchasing managers indices, a slowing in real personal income, a spike in new claims for unemployment toward the 340,000 level, an abrupt drop in consumer confidence about 10 - 20 points below its 12 - month average, and at least some amount of slowing in employment growth and aggregate hours worked.

The need for deeper advisor awareness and understanding of the broader role Social Security claiming strategies can play in creating a secure retirement was becoming abundantly clear and it was at that point I realized a firm dedicated solely to the education of financial professionals made sense.»

(Creationism fails to be a theory mainly because of the last point; it makes few or no specific claims about what we would expect to find, so it can't be used for anything.

A better strategy would be to point out how one doesn't need religion to be a moral person, and then demonstrate how some of the people that claim to be a beacon for religious zealots (the GOP) practice an existence devoid of morality.

I'm to the point where every time a progressive claims «This analogy is about resisting movement towards justice and equality for all.»

That however does NOT mean that the bible is not true (An ad hominem (Latin for «to the man» or «to the person»), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an attempt to negate the truth of a claim by pointing out a negative characteristic or belief of the person supporting it)

Lincoln exploded this as preposterous, demonstrating their behavior's incompatibility with the Constitution, pointing out that if they really wanted to claim revolutionary grounds for action, they should have the courage to make that argument instead, and resting his own argument on the principles of the Declaration.

I am merely pointing out that this «new» information has been around for 200 years and the claims that these people are making that martyrdom was somehow not important to the rise of Christianity is false.

Why did you disappear when I pointed out that you weren't giving any basis (scientific or scriptural) for your claims in the previous page?

Point no. 5, especially, should undermine the various claims for the little girl's fundamentally Christian motivation.

Finally, the extraordinary claims made by religion are at best, unsupported, and at worst, demonstrably false — although for too long, it has been a taboo to point this out.

:... still we have a ton of physical evidence that God is real...» One point of view: Most, if not all, Atheists would disagree with this statement and ask for solid scientific evidence to support such a claim.

Lewis S. Ford has addressed himself directly to the claim for nonphysical (but still temporal) successiveness in the genetic process in his article «On Genetic Successiveness: a Third Alternative» (1: 421 - 25).1 Ford begins by pointing out that the differences between phases in a single occasion can not be mere differences in complexity of integration.

Although some commentators claim that the encounter with the hemorrhaging woman simply occupies an interlude in the story of Jairus's daughter, her healing points to the faith necessary for new life.

The advocates of every religion know they have no evidence for anything they claim, and they know people will challenge them on this point.

At one point, for example, Carter describes beautifully the creedal portions of the Catholic belief in the sacraments, only to end by claiming that «the entire purpose of the sacraments was to give an outward sign of belief.»

Given that people can be deluded or more often, allow their desire to believe something destroy their objectivity to the point their conclusions aren't reliable, your claims about private, personal experiences no one outside your head can verify simply aren't enough for anyone but you.

The critical point, of course, is the claim for genetic but not actual analyzability.

This vision serves as «a viable point of departure for oppressed persons, suggesting that in the quest for liberation oppressed persons must claim their freedom.»

Good point Xavier - however, the real problem is that this generation has not bothered to investigate the truth claims of Christianity for themselves.

You apparently claim to be a Christian and yet there you are, sitting in your chair, pointing fingers and speaking for God himself.

Julie, as you correctly point out, has offered support for her claims, and the principle figures in this mess have answered with nothing more than outright dismissal and disdain for her, and that — at least to my mind — gives the lie to their protestations of innocence, whether before the fact or after.

Christians are then left pointing to sociological maladies to vindicate our claims or appealing to the authority of a «pure science» which doesn't exist; or in the case of «same sex marriage,» we're reduced to pleading for private exemptions from public «justice.»

While Keen claims that this element is found in one's autobiography, Moltmann asserts that this beginning point is discovered in the universal cry for freedom which extends even to the Godhead.

I would point out however... that it is you who is claiming an absolute definition for the word so, perhaps while you wait for my «exegetical evidence», you might provide a little of your own substantiating your usage of the term?

Reinforcing in advance the claim I have put forth at the end of Part Two, Hartshorne went on to point out: «Just as the Stoics said the ideal was to have good will toward all but not in such fashion as to depend in any [221] degree for happiness upon their fortunes or misfortunes, so Christian theologians, who scarcely accepted this idea in their ethics, nevertheless adhered to it in characterizing God.»

Yet no part, no single tradition, can claim a superior vantage point for viewing the whole.

I do hear your points that you think I have not seen the need for warning of danger, that you believe I think of it as «unChristian» to talk about such things, and that you may even believe that my comments are akin to protecting evil deeds and harming the innocent, using the bible as a proof texting weapon to that end and contributing to a problem of church becoming fake and shallow while claiming to be deep and pious.

As Moltmann points out, God - language must be set in the category of expectation, since this is appropriate for a God of promise.15 Our problem here, therefore, is not to establish the ontological foundation for God - talk but to consider the position and claim of linguistic analysis in relation to the question of the validity of God - talk.