Sentences with phrase «claim the points here»

KEY FACT: West Ham have lost only one of their last 10 Premier League matches MATCH ODDS: Brighton 11/8 Draw 2/1 West Ham 27/10 bet365 Pick: Under 1.5 goals @ 6/4 ANDY SAYS: Another close call, and I can't split them... 1 - 1 GRAEME SAYS: I can see Brighton edging this with the home advantage... 2 - 1 SILKY SAYS: I think West Ham could claim the points here... 0 - 2 FOOTBALLIndex — One to follow: Lewis Dunk at 81p is a player with real potential

Not exact matches

As Julie pointed out, I don't see the moderator here claiming to be a psychologist.

As Moltmann points out, God - language must be set in the category of expectation, since this is appropriate for a God of promise.15 Our problem here, therefore, is not to establish the ontological foundation for God - talk but to consider the position and claim of linguistic analysis in relation to the question of the validity of God - talk.

I think the larger point was lost here though which is when believers make the claim for God the non-believers say «Prove it.»

But here, too, Kagan tends to focus on extremes, claiming that the commitment of America's founders to international law and diplomacy reveals a «psychology of weakness» that reflects the young nation's lack of power in the late eighteenth century; likewise, the secret yearning of the Founders to beat the Europeans at power politics pointed toward a properly imperial future.

How come some people on here claim to possess a logical and fact based mindset, yet can't explain their point of view without acting hostile and demeaning toward «religious people».

But here's the germane point: To reject human exceptionalism is essentially to claim that we are just another animal in the forest, which leads to the logical conclusion that killing should be an allowable remedy to illness and disability.

Couple of points here, you claim god has given us his word and spirit, these are 2 assertions that you have no demonstrable evidence for.

Here was Alyssa Rosenberg at the Washington Post claiming that the whole point of Wonder Woman is that she's a role model for prepubescent girls, a kind of «Fearless Girl» avant la statue: «[T] he movie... argues that it's... little girls all over the world who stand to gain if they can grow up free of the distorting influence of misogyny,» Rosenberg wrote, with a schoolmarm's didacticism.

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

the point here: if so (as many of your referenced speakers do above), it is logically inconsistent to claim the fundamental nature of existence is meaningless (lacking any significance) yet our personal lives are significant.

My point here is not to make dogmatic claims about what will ever be scientifically or technically possible, but to suggest once again the Hall's own vision of the future may take too seriously the self - image of some technologists as practitioners of a purely rational and completely formalizable activity.

If love has a history then here is the point at which that history is shaped by a new understanding which claims to have its source in the history of Jesus.

My point here is not to particularly attack b4bigbang, it is to take this one pretty typical creationist claim and point out that it is an absolutely unsupportable falsehood, and that this is pretty typical of creationist arguments.

But the great achievement here is that evangelicalism affirms a scripturally grounded conceptual framework that is shared by all who lay claim to historic Christian orthodoxy, thereby providing common points of reference for the continuing and candid engagement of our agreements and disagreements.

The issue here is whether the claim is supported or not and as you didn't see fit to respond to my pointing out Tour's failure to identify specific deficiencies, I take this as your concession that his claim, as provided in your linked articles, was supported not by citing evidence, but rather by referencing anecdotes.

I assume they would explain the essential elements of Paul's point here is that Christ died for sins and was raised — and even in their own interpretation in which they claim this «good news» is only essential for believers — they have enough sense to explain to believers the burial is mentioned as proof of His death, and the witnesses are mentioned as proof of His resurrection.

3 The obvious critical point to make of Whitehead here is to indicate that his statement that science is true for each percipient is to claim to know something of the experience, qua scientific, of each percipient, and hence to have admitted an element of transcendence into the very statement of the problem.

When a group claims they have a monopoly on the truth (insert your faith here) there is no point in trying to have a meaningful dialogue.

Arsene Wenger engineered a brilliant win over Chelsea to claim the FA Cup yet again, but where it matters most over the course of a full season, Arsenal were miles off the pace, and ended up 18 points behind the Champions and out of the Top Four for the first time ever under Le Prof.... Read the full article here

KEY FACT: In Liverpool's only previous PL visit to London Stadium they won 4 - 0 to record their biggest away league victory at West Ham MATCH ODDS: West Ham 4/1 Draw 3/1 Liverpool 8/13 bet365 Pick: Under 4.5 cards 8/13 ANDY SAYS: Easy win for Liverpool here, don't say how West Ham will compete... 0 - 3 GRAEME SAYS: West Ham need to get something I think they might claim a point... 1 - 1 SILKY SAYS: Hard one but I believe that Liverpool will land the win... 1 - 2 FOOTBALLIndex — One to follow: Just under # 2, Mo Salah is a great deal

KEY FACT: Newcastle have lost only two of their last 17 home league meetings with Leicester MATCH ODDS: Newcastle 13/8 Draw 23/10 Leicester 19/10 bet365 Pick: Harry Maguire to score anytime @ 10/1 ANDY SAYS: I will go with Newcastle to just get the three points here, but close..1 - 0 GRAEME SAYS: I can see Newcastle ending their poor run and just doing enough to claim the win... 2 - 1 SILKY SAYS: I believe Leicester will have enough to claim the three points here... 1 - 2 FOOTBALLIndex — One to follow: Jamie Vardy has plummeted to outside the top - 400 and is now just 70p

KEY FACT: Stoke have won seven of their last nine home Premier League matches against newly promoted sides MATCH ODDS: Stoke 6/5 Draw 9/4 Brighton 11/4 bet365 Pick: Half time score 0 - 0 @ 6/4 ANDY SAYS: Stoke win for me here, think Paul Lambert will get the win... 2 - 0 GRAEME SAYS: Stoke have improved and they should just about claim the three points... 2 - 1 SILKY SAYS: I can see a home win, think Stoke will take the victory... 2 - 0 FOOTBALLIndex — One to follow: At # 0.69, Jack Butland has to be a good buy

KEY FACT: West Ham are unbeaten in their last five Premier League matches against Crystal Palace MATCH ODDS: West Ham 21/10 Draw 9/4 Palace 31/20 bet365 Pick: Both Teams to Score @ 4/5 ANDY SAYS: Tough call this one, but I will back my former club to take a point... 1 - 1 GRAEME SAYS: A big game for both clubs, but maybe West Ham might just have the edge... 2 - 1 SILKY SAYS: I think West Ham should and will claim the win here... 2 - 0 FOOTBALLIndex — One to follow: Javier Hernandez might still be a good investment

So Owen Coyle's men have a glorious opportunity here to not only enhance their claims for the Europa League, but to also apply some pressure on one of their main rivals for a top - six finish in Kenny Daglish's Reds, who face a difficult trip to relegation - threatened West Ham the following day and are by no means guaranteed three points.

KEY FACT: Arsenal have won four of their last five Premier League meetings with Swansea MATCH ODDS: Swansea 25/4 Draw 7/2 Arsenal 1/2 bet365 Pick: Arsenal to win @ 1/2 ANDY SAYS: Not sure here, I can see Swansea getting something from this... 1 - 1 GRAEME SAYS: Tough game but have to go with Arsenal... 1 - 2 SILKY SAYS: Arsenal to claim the three points here... 0 - 2 FOOTBALLIndex — One to follow: Jack Wilshere is looking good on the Index

If they could claim three points here, it would a hugely impressive victory for the Baggies.

However, they're 10 points back from Chelsea, so they'll need to claim all three points here to boost their title charge.

At home they're a lot more comfortable, winning half of their 10 games here, claiming 18 points overall.

KEY FACT: Leicester have won seven of their last nine home league matches MATCH ODDS: Leicester 17/20 Draw 29/10 Watford 10/3 bet365 Pick: Under 2.5 goals @ 6/4 ANDY SAYS: Has to be a home win, Leicester are looking decent... 2 - 0 GRAEME SAYS: Leicester will surely have too much for Watford here... 3 - 1 SILKY SAYS: Close game, two decent teams but I think Leicester will claim the three points... 2 - 1 FOOTBALLIndex — One to follow: In the top - 50 at just over # 2, Richarlison still a good buy

KEY FACT: Arsenal have never failed to score in 17 home league matches against Crystal Palace MATCH ODDS: Arsenal 1/2 Draw 15/4 Palace 6/1 bet365 Pick: Under 2.5 goals @ 27/20 ANDY SAYS: I can see my former club claiming a point from this... 1 - 1 GRAEME SAYS: Hard to see Palace getting anything here, and they probably won't... 2 - 1 SILKY SAYS: Arsenal will have too much for Palace here, home win... 3 - 1 FOOTBALLIndex — One to follow: Wilfried Zaha at # 1.79 looks a very good buy

Fair enough — I see your point and I've even voted you up for your neat explanation above here But, since we've moved to linguistic, I want to reply to your «defence» of the quoted claims.

«What I'm saying here is pointing at a very, very irrational possible outcome of our potty electoral system, which is that a party that has spectacularly lost the election because fewer people are voting for it than any other party, could nonetheless according to constitutional tradition and convention still lay claim to providing the prime minister of the country.»

I have five particular points here, but in general, I claim that a more balanced perspective reveals that, while realism doesn't have all of the answers, it is more potent than Motyl admits.

The main points here that you are most likely going to be interested in are that we expect you to use Real Plans responsibly and we are not liable if you send a claim against us for any part of our service.

Of course, no one seems to take much of what Armond White says seriously (he also claims that Roger Ebert destroyed film criticism), but I think he makes an interesting point here.

However, MK saying «writer / professional author» is basically attempting to claim higher status for the word Author, which is not a significant point here.

Here is an example that doesn't deal with harassment to illustrate my point: I claim somebody stole money from me in a business dealing.

The point here was to help authors understand that there are some masqueraders out there claiming their «products» deliver sales when they are not built to do that.

Other notorious activists (& 13D filers) are Dan Loeb of Third Point (and here, though he claims he's mellowed now!)

Here are some of the points they had to make on «abandonment» claims, with slight formatting changes to accommodate the Chew on This blog platform:

So here, for the umpteenth time and in the service of any animals whose very life might depend on the decisions made by anyone who might be misled by Clifton and Young's errors of fact, judgment, and ethics, is a point by point refutation of each of their erroneous claims.

Here killing fog monsters and claiming pieces of gold both award victory points, but the biggest source of points comes from gathering up companions.

If you use the points gained here to buy Pokemon Alpha Sapphire / Omega Ruby or Super Smash Bros 3DS, you can get those games for an extra # 7.39 / # 10.02 respectively, and also claim a free game via Nintendo's own initiative.

«The claim is that the shift to the kind of detail in her work is an incredible shift from the detail here,» Stella said, pointing to «Giufra.»

Rebuttals are not hard to find (if you go to «start here» on the top of the RC page, and scroll to the section that says «Informed, but seeking serious discussion of common contrarian talking points» each one of those links discusses this claim, and similar ones).

My point here is that claims that there has been cooling over Antarctica are not simply figments of some skeptics» imagination.

It's very interesting to me that people so unworried about a few percentage points in terms of CO2 concentration are often associated with people who claim that everything is just right here on earth and that if our orbit were a bit closer to or further from the sun (& cetera) life couldn't exist.

The point made here is that if one cherry - picks a small subset of the data, one can make just about any claim with a nice plot to back it up.

I already knew of the accusation that fictional names were said to be in the Oregon Petition, when I detailed the wipeout within the claim in my October 4, 2010 American Thinker piece, by pointing to a much - lesser - seen longer version of a 1998 Seattle Times article and its shorter version (side - by - side screencapture here for quick reference).