Sentences with phrase «claim they experienced as»

Inspired by the Church's use of filming techniques, and aided by ex-members of the organization, Theroux uses actors to replay some incidents people claim they experienced as members in an attempt to better understand the way it operates.

We're here to guide you through the process and help make your claims experience as smooth and stress - free as possible.

Even still, we're confident that Travelers can keep you covered at a price you like — just don't count on a claims experience as painless as GEICO's.

We're here to guide you through the process and help make your claims experience as smooth and stress - free as possible.

Not exact matches

Carly Fiorina seems to be claiming the same thing as she touts her experience as the CEO of Hewlett - Packard (though some might add «into the ground» to that first phrase).

With years of experience in a particular industry, «these types of entrepreneurs are not only very well positioned to feel what is needed in the market — as they understand it perfectly — but they are also usually pretty good at executing their business as they easily earn their customers» and partners» trust because of their credibility and legitimacy,» claims Soussan.

The move will help HootSuite offer more analysis to its high - paying enterprise clients — HootSuite claims these include 75 % of Fortune 1000 companies — as uberVu has experience offering insight to over 200 clients, including a few big names like NBC, 3M and Heinz.

«Culture — as experienced through design - led innovation — may be the best way to claim sustainable territory, because it is so much harder to copy.»

This is achieved with Amino's massive trove of deidentified data from patient experiences as described in the services billed and paid for in 9 billion commercial and Medicare insurance claims.

The older segment of this group is those who have achieved some degree of entrepreneurial success without the benefit of a college degree and have their own experience as proof of their claim.

He then goes on to assert that it is simply not true that strength and weakness in gold stocks tells us anything about the future performance of gold, which as anyone with a little bit of experience in trading this sector knows is incorrect, even if he tries to support his claim with presumably carefully cherry - picked statistics.

With this in mind, if the human experience is, as the quote suggests, a journey home, perhaps art puts us on a plane and the Bible holds a sign with our name in baggage claim.

Jennifer C What I find sad is the degree to which some Christians will go to protect their claimed monopoly to things like «love», as if non-Christians do not any experience with it at all.

Reading the account of how this professor expressed himself about the author's experience with the dying begs the question in my mind, - How many religious scholars and clergymen are as truly enlightened about life, death and the nature of things as they self - satisfyingly claim to be doctored in religion?

But I can tell you from direct, first - hand experience that Mitt's integrity is just as solid and forthright as his supporters claim.

Genesis 1:1... «in the beginning, God...» John 3:16... «For God so loved... «I'm Blind, but now I see...» your personal experience confirms nothing... the patients on the psych unit of my hospital are filled with some amazing claims... just as the Muslim, the Jew, the Buddhist, the Rastafarian make claims of their experience...

Insofar as the experience of this self is unconscious, its immediacy and directness offer no exploitable advantage: one can hardly claim to be conscious of the essence of experience as exhibited immediately and directly in an experience of which one is not consciously aware.

This means that a certain metaphysical theory is evaluated not only with regard to its internal intelligibility (as Hartshorne claimed in his program), but also in the aspect of its agreement with experiences.

In some cases this appeal to inner intuition might take the form of the claim that each of us has a «non-sensuous experience of the self» which is «both prior to our interpretation of our sense - knowledge and more important as source for the more fundamental questions of the meaning of our human experience as human selves» (BRO 75).

This contention is not defeated merely by a critic's facile claim not to be conscious of any such nonsensuous perception of one's own «self,» or of anything describable as experience mediating one's experiences of trees, dogs, and fire hydrants.

I'm not necessarily claiming that Christianity is wonderful (I'm an atheist), but that Christianity as it is known and experienced today is much, much more mellow an ideology both in theory and practice than Islam.

The facet of that theory that is of special interest here is the claim that temporality is essential to experience as such and therefore to divine as well as to human experience.

If, as the Scriptures and experience tell us, all men are by nature in a state of guilt and depravity from which they are wholly unable to deliver themselves and have no claim whatever on God for deliverance, it follows that if any are saved God must choose out those who shall be the objects of His grace (Boettner, Predestination, 95).

And I have sought to show, using Hartshorne as a concrete example, how a dialectical defense provides the ultimate support for one's claims about experience and its essential temporality and how that dialectic rests on claims quite remote from any direct or straightforward reading of experience, whether private or public.

Even if one accepts the claim that memory is an experience of the past, this is rather like saying that if we define dog as a four - legged mammal, then all horses are dogs.

The claim that «necessarily, creative experience occurs» presupposes as necessary all the statements which describe what creative synthesis is.

But by shifting the emphasis to personal appropriation of the gospel message, they downplayed the importance of these supernatural claims about the Bible as such and reopened the issue of the value and importance of personal religious experience.

(continued from 6/1/09) As little inclined as is Charles Taylor to connect the pre-ontological with the metaphysical, religious «experience» with cognitive assertions, he can not finally avoid making certain claims about the way things are, or at least the way human things are: We all see..As little inclined as is Charles Taylor to connect the pre-ontological with the metaphysical, religious «experience» with cognitive assertions, he can not finally avoid making certain claims about the way things are, or at least the way human things are: We all see..as is Charles Taylor to connect the pre-ontological with the metaphysical, religious «experience» with cognitive assertions, he can not finally avoid making certain claims about the way things are, or at least the way human things are: We all see....

Science clearly disproves some aspects of the bible, and some takes on evolution but the bible never claimed to be a «scientific proof for the existence of God» it was meant as a blueprint for how to live so that you may experience God directly.

The sacrament «is stripped of its essential character when it no longer includes an elemental, life - claiming and life - determining experience of the other person, of the otherness, as of something coming to meet and acting hitherwards.»

The Easter experience, that Jesus is the living Lord who claims us as his followers, can not be demonstrated to be true like a scientific proposition.

My point was that believers in all faiths claim that same experience; I used Vishnu as it pertains to a large, active religion.

If you want to validate the God claim this way — as a subjective experience, basically a human emotion or idea — then I actually agree.

I have experienced this a lot and have learned to calmly fight through all of them; they have since stopped talking to me, probably claiming that the Bible is telling them to do so (as if I am the bad guy in all of this... as if!

It may indeed seem that what I have done so far is to offer a tentative argument against the claims of an exemplarist interpretation of Christ's work, namely, that if he is offered us as an exemplar his experience is in crucial respects too relative and limited to offer a wholly significant guide - post to men and women in all the circumstances of their lives.

As I'll discuss at the end of my presentation, political science only does this by dint of a systematic abstraction of our lived political experience, that is, by singularly emphasizing politics as the management of a conflict of interests rather than the prudential navigation of conflicts between competing claims to honor, or of competing claims to the gooAs I'll discuss at the end of my presentation, political science only does this by dint of a systematic abstraction of our lived political experience, that is, by singularly emphasizing politics as the management of a conflict of interests rather than the prudential navigation of conflicts between competing claims to honor, or of competing claims to the gooas the management of a conflict of interests rather than the prudential navigation of conflicts between competing claims to honor, or of competing claims to the good.

The hotly debated question as to whether this implies that the Kingdom is to be regarded as present, inbreaking, dawning, casting its shadows before it, or whatever, becomes academic when we realize that the claim of the saying is that certain events in the ministry of Jesus are nothing less than an experience of the Kingdom of God.

However if your claim has been inaccurate, then just as equally, the pain I will have experienced will have been as a result of being wronged by you.

I can't say that everyone would experience the same thing if everyone did what I did because not everyone who claims to have done the same thing have also stated that they had the same type of experiences nor have they come to the same conclusions as I have.

As I am aware that many are promoting a popular view that has been rationalized by whatever means, however you have failed to provide a shred of the emperical proof you claim, and as far as personal experiences, my point exactly has been that they exist in the realm of feeling and emotion, which any rational person would willingly admit is often self - deceptive...As I am aware that many are promoting a popular view that has been rationalized by whatever means, however you have failed to provide a shred of the emperical proof you claim, and as far as personal experiences, my point exactly has been that they exist in the realm of feeling and emotion, which any rational person would willingly admit is often self - deceptive...as far as personal experiences, my point exactly has been that they exist in the realm of feeling and emotion, which any rational person would willingly admit is often self - deceptive...as personal experiences, my point exactly has been that they exist in the realm of feeling and emotion, which any rational person would willingly admit is often self - deceptive.....

However, Whitehead uses the experience of CE as evidenced for an objective claim, so it seems as if he is making an objective claim about it, and hence it could be erroneous, since there could be a difference between «seems» and «is.»

In spite of the fact that Hartshorne universally posits a strong sense of relativity to account for omniscience (as well as for other reasons), I will argue that even Hartshorne is forced in important specific cases to attenuate his claims for a strong interpretation of divine relativity; one that says God feels in exactitude the experience of others.

Most AG members have personally experienced these gifts: 65 percent claim to pray in tongues; 61 percent have personally experienced divine healing as a result of prayer; 55 percent regularly receive definite answers to specific prayer requests; 32 percent say they are regularly «led by God» to perform specific acts; and nearly 30 percent believe they have been used by God to prophesy.

If, as Zennists claim, such endeavors lead us to learn something about the fundamental nature of our own experience, they might also lead us to learn something about the fundamental nature of God's experience.

In my experience, the issue is not an anti-christian world, but a sense that certain individual «Christians» such as yourself, as well as some various religious denominations claiming to be Christian, have set themselves up as judges of all humanity.

I find that Whitehead's exposition is question - begging and seriously misleading.4 The exposition is misleading insofar as it suggests that belief in either a specific or generic causal nexus is adequately justified by a subject's experience of CE alone and not ultimately by systematic considerations, particularly those related to prehension.5 If Whitehead's theory of perception was intended to stand alone without support from the rest of his system, as Ford suggests (EWM 181 - 182), then I claim that it is insufficiently justified insofar as a part of it, the theory of CE, is inadequately justified.

He cites writings by John O'Malley as well as those by Gregory Baum, who claims the council reflects a «Blondelian shift» from «extrinsicism» toward experience and immanence.

As Ross points out, «Whitehead's examples of causal efficacy in conscious experience are a light flash and the agent's claim that «the flash made me blink» (PR 175).

If one has actually experienced God, as revealed through Jesus Christ and his Holy Spirit, then one has the evidence needed to have confidence that the bible is exactly what it claims to be: the revealed word of God.

Such groups have claimed that federal hate crimes laws will silence preachers, ignoring those laws» robust protections for free speech and religious expression, as well as the experience in the many states with such protections already in place.