Sentences with phrase «claim to the contrary seems»

The answer is no, and intervenor Growth Energy's claim to the contrary seems rooted in fantasy.

Not exact matches

And no, you have not presented any valid proof or evidence whatsoever, despite your (dishonest) claims to the contrary, that your nasty sky fairy AKA Allah exists, which is a good thing since he seems to be a violent, murderous ass hole just like his many terrorist followers.

This claim seems to me to be far more philosophically penetrating, and more disturbing, than the often - heard but more piecemeal criticisms of modern technology's negative environmental, economic, or social - political consequences, or even the critique of present uses of technology as «inhumane» or contrary to basic human values.

You keep making these claims... and no amount of evidence or experience to the contrary seems to cause you to question your assumptions.

The claim mentioned on Wikipedia is that the German - Soviet non-aggression pact is emphasised as evidence somehow, but that seems to be cherry picking one or two things from a huge amount of evidence to the contrary.

Contrary to Paladino's claims, the average American does not seem have some doubts that the president is a Muslim: polls indicate only 18 to 29 percent of the populace identify him as an adherent of the world's second - largest religion.

Therefore, despite common claims to the contrary, muscle activity of the rectus abdominis seems to be challenged equally during the back squat and the split squat.

But by far the worst thing is how so many people seem to want to defend it, or even try to claim that it's good despite all evidence to the contrary.

It's a system that will boast tremendous first party games but third party support still seems poor, despite claims to the contrary, and we'll still be seeing older titles like Skyrim emerging years after their prime and newer games like FIFA with stripped back features.

Contrary to the claims, it seems less than five Horizon fans wrote negative reviews for Breath of the Wild, and the link (haha) is tenuous even among those.

Since this doesn't seem to have occurred (despite some claims to the contrary — see Section 5), it suggests that the apparent sea level rise is a naturally - occurring phenomenon (perhaps due to natural global warming).

Further to this post it occurred to me that a lot of the confusion in this controversy seems to arise in the fact that MM are not claiming that their refutation of MBH98 & MBH99 implies that «therefore, on the contrary, the MWP was hotter than today» but only that «it is therefore unknown whether the MWP was hotter or colder than today.»

Contrary to the claims of the blogosphere — it seems again that no fundamental problem has been identified.

So, creating more water vapor artificially, using aluminum, barium, sulphates, or any other nucleator, seems just plain contrary to what they claim they are combatting.

It is therefore puzzling to me that you have offered it as a discussion of the evidence «beyond the modelling», or what that expression means, since it seems very clear that modelling entirely underpins every aspect of the discussion, contrary to Lord Deben's claims in question.

The ECJ went a little closer to your position, but still seems to equivocate: «39 In those circumstances, contrary to what is claimed by AC ‑ Treuhand, even though those service contracts were formally concluded separately from the commitments entered into by the producers of heat stabilisers among themselves, and notwithstanding the fact that AC ‑ Treuhand is a consultancy firm, it can not be concluded that the action taken by AC ‑ Treuhand in that capacity constituted mere peripheral services that were unconnected with the obligations assumed by the producers and the ensuring restrictions of competition.»

Practice Note: This decision runs contrary to recent decisions in other jurisdictions that seem to relax the standard privity requirements in legal malpractice claims and permit assignments of legal malpractice claims to non-clients in a business context.

To the contrary, it seems that the main objection here is that too many actual people have successfully claimed awards, of which lawyers have taken an overly large chunk (but not so overly large as to deprive the successful claimants of all or most of the proceedsTo the contrary, it seems that the main objection here is that too many actual people have successfully claimed awards, of which lawyers have taken an overly large chunk (but not so overly large as to deprive the successful claimants of all or most of the proceedsto deprive the successful claimants of all or most of the proceeds).

EDITOR»S NOTE: It seems contrary to notions of judicial economy, mandatory joiner and the entire controversy doctrine that the claims against the mother and her parents would be handled in separate venues.