Sentences with phrase «claim would probably»

In reality, the claim would probably not drive the policy up anywhere near this much, but for the sake of argument, let's look at worst case scenarios.

Filing a claim would probably produce a tempting payout of several hundred to more than $ 1,000, after the deductible.

Both parties to this type of claim would probably prefer the status quo, but will the courts go along with that in the new regime?

In reality, the claim would probably not drive the policy up anywhere near this much, but for the sake of argument, let's look at worst case scenarios.

That claim you've probably read about whey all over the internet is about as relevant as the ag industry also trying to sell to people through masses of blogs that lard is a «healthy fat.»

Below are 10 of the more common auto insurance claims you've probably filed:

In a footnote, the court noted that the tenant's claims would probably also fail under the Fair Housing Act.

Not exact matches

They may well relaunch the campaign once more — but they'd probably need an even bigger overhaul of their claims this time around, and maybe even a new platform to host it.

If you plan to return to work after 12 months and at 11.5 months you realize you still don't have daycare arranged, you probably won't be able to extend your benefits at that point because you've already been claiming benefits at the higher, shorter - term 55 percent rate.

Despite North Korea's claim that Sunday's test simulated a reentry situation, South Korean defense officials say the North probably has yet to master the technology.

Mitchel Kalmanson, president of insurance company Lester Kalmanson Agency, mused that a real world Jurassic Park (another brainchild of Michael Crichton's) would probably have a $ 1.5 million annual premium and would likely be responsible for the first $ 5 million claim or so.

With more than $ 1.2 billion backing it and Intel at its side, Cloudera claims the most widely adopted Hadoop technology in the world — although Hortonworks (which got $ 50 million from Hewlett - Packard (HPQ) over the summer) and MapR Technologies would probably argue the point.

If you hear that claim from someone who lives next door to the red house and you trust that person, you probably would be inclined to believe the information more than if you heard it from someone else who lives next to you (and further from the red house).

This is something that I should probably keep in mind, because it would help me a lot to have control over where in the income statement I own a claim.

A U.S. dispute involving national security would threaten WTO discipline, since other countries would probably follow suit and use it to justify their own claims to be exempt from the rules.

There would also probably no shortage of public outrage, with some claiming that the government is trying to censor certain political beliefs.

There is probably truth in both of those, but I do think it is important, in considering claims of irrational exuberance, to note that the earnings price ratio - interest rate relationship is in a very difference place than it has been in past peaks.

If you have no special circumstances, or are confident you probably won't even need to file a claim in the future, State Farm is probably the best company to go with if you're in DC.

This is probably for the best, as PangaePanga claimed, «If anyone ever beats «Pit of Panga: P - Break,» I may have to make a harder level.»

Due to the large number of these provisions, it's probably a good idea to hold off on filing your return if it includes any item that would have qualified for a deduction or credit that expired at the end of 2016, until you can determine whether that item was extended — and whether the IRS is ready to accept a return claiming that tax benefit.

Of course, «Jake Orton» claims that he has never paid out the $ 10,000 before, which is probably the only truthful claim in the whole thing.

Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen — the same one who claims to have paid the $ 130,000 out of his own pocket — appears to have signed the contract, and Trump's team will probably argue that this is sufficient.

Some services such as Coinbase claim that all the currency that they hold in their exchange are insured against theft and that this insurance policy would cover any customer funds lost, but it's probably not something that you want to put to the test.

Few would dispute that corporate tax cuts increase corporate profits, elevate executive compensation and probably boost short - term shareholder returns.  But to claim they pay for themselves by increasing revenues?

As you have already probably deduced from the bombastic claims of $ 8,750 per hour at «no - loss», the Azure Method is just another scam with laughable claims.

There is no claim to religion overtly presented, which is probably why Coppedge has a case here.

Also if a true doctor struck up a conversation with me he'd probably be able to see through my claim as well.

We hurt their feelings and probably interfere with their sleep patterns by calling them out on everything from poor spelling to having a faith grounded in no evidence (at least in its core claims).

Like the good Dr. has pointed out, using your book to refute someone elses book when both have the same historical significance, outlandish claims and religion is probably the dumbest thing you can do.

Well, let's just say I have my proof, and claims like must upset you, like a guy with a ferrari telling you that it's within your reach, but you'll probably never get one, because you don't really believe it's possible.

But given that there isn't proof for it and it claims to be able to violate the natural laws of the universe (which I also have never seen happen) allows me to reach the conclusion that there probably isn't a God.

@david johnson... and non religious... the indifferent probably well over 990,000,000 who do not by their indifference accept atheist theory, but atheists try to claim them to bolster their numbers.Atheism has always been the stuff of frauds.

But it makes sense that it's a cross since most who died would probably have claimed to be Christian (based simply on US statistics).

You are the one who is trying to claim that everyone has faith, probably in an attempt to rationalize your own very irrational faith.

A group that claims a sincere religious belief in staying high all the time will probably lose its ease, not because it is necessarily insincere but because any drug defendant could make that claim and courts have no good way to know who is telling the truth.

Just this emphasis is characteristic of Jesus» conception, probably also of that of John the Baptist — the Jew as such has no claim before God.

Among the publications mentioned that have any claims to intellectual seriousness, First Things probably has the largest actual readership.

I have experienced this a lot and have learned to calmly fight through all of them; they have since stopped talking to me, probably claiming that the Bible is telling them to do so (as if I am the bad guy in all of this... as if!

At least with this one you probably have some ideas of a few verses I am perverting to make such a claim.

And if after merely hearing about it they decide it's not worth their extremely limited time to investigate those claims that conflict with their local religion, or they don't have the literacy to «study» it, they'll probably make that «wrong» choice to not believe it, so we've just consigned them to hell, haven't we?

I would add... the battle against ones personal sin (s) is probably an evidence that the person who claims Christ as Lord is a Believer.

I responded that it probably depended on the attitude they had toward the conflicting claims of Israel and the Palestinians.

If there were NO wars or genocides or murder done by religion you would have a claim but also we all know religion has probably killed even more than the ones you cited.

Although the Bible does not say so, Nicodemus could probably have made a similar claim.

The CHA claims to represent a total membership of perhaps 2 million, while American Pentecostalism would probably exceed twice that figure.

While Becker probably overstates the case when he claims that the unity of aim of religion and psychology has brought clergymen and psychiatrists «into a contiguity and interlacing of work where it is no longer possible to distinguish neatly the psychologist from his religious colleague,» (Russell J. Becker, «Links Between Psychology and Religion,» American Psychologist, 1958, 13, pp. 566 - 68.)

Yet although Muslims speak so much of the Mercy and Compassion of God, Montgomery Watt, a Christian scholar with a deep knowledge of and sympathy for Islam, probably correctly assesses the views of many Christians when he says that they «would claim that God as conceived by Christians is more loving than God as conceived by Muslims.»

And even if it had made this claim, we should probably not be able to tell which «Mark» was meant.

The writers (the story carries no byline) claim «donations from the faithful are thought to have declined by as much as 20 \ %» and that «the scandals probably played a part in this».

Less persuasive, to me at least, is the claim that this probably continued until 1931, the year in which Lewis converted to Christianity (and would now think a relation with a married woman to be wrong) Wilson's way of making this point is, however, an instance of a very undesirable trait in his writing: the tendency to assert indirectly and to be glib while seeming to eschew it: «It would be far too glib to suggest that he consciously made the second change, to adopt Christianity, merely to give himself an excuse to abandon sexual relations with Mrs. Moore, whatever the nature of those relations had been.»