Sentences with phrase «claimant in the second case»

Some 95 % of firms signed the contract, but the claimant in the second case (DM) objected.

The claimant in the first case was one of his earlier victims and the claimant in the second case one of the later ones.

Peggy Etiebet (instructed by Traymans) for the claimant in the second case.

Not exact matches

First, where a Will is made which fails to make reasonable financial provision from the estate for the claimant and second, if no Will was made at all, in which case the intestacy laws apply.

Such a case may start from Ukraine in terms of negotiations, then proceed judicially in Greece, security measures (ship arrest) may be taken in Romania; when it comes to enforcement of the judgement, and a Russian insurer is involved refusing to pay under LOI issued for release of the ship in Romania, you have to initiate enforcement proceedings in Russia, whereas the said vessel may have been arrested by the claimants for the second time in Bangladesh, on the same claim against the new ship owner, where the court decides that it will hear the case against the latter on the merits.

Second, the cases did not establish any rule or principle, applicable to collision cases or analogous types of case in the Admiralty Court, where there was no counterclaim, that a claimant who was found at fault under MSA 1995, ss 187 (1) and (2) should recover its costs in proportion to the percentage of liability of the defendant.

In an illustration of the practice's track record in catastrophic loss cases, Paul Whitfield acted in a claim brought by a yard foreman alleging that a forklift truck was negligently driven into him, resulting in serious injury; in a second application, the firm succeeded in agreeing a «drop hands» discontinuance with the claimanIn an illustration of the practice's track record in catastrophic loss cases, Paul Whitfield acted in a claim brought by a yard foreman alleging that a forklift truck was negligently driven into him, resulting in serious injury; in a second application, the firm succeeded in agreeing a «drop hands» discontinuance with the claimanin catastrophic loss cases, Paul Whitfield acted in a claim brought by a yard foreman alleging that a forklift truck was negligently driven into him, resulting in serious injury; in a second application, the firm succeeded in agreeing a «drop hands» discontinuance with the claimanin a claim brought by a yard foreman alleging that a forklift truck was negligently driven into him, resulting in serious injury; in a second application, the firm succeeded in agreeing a «drop hands» discontinuance with the claimanin serious injury; in a second application, the firm succeeded in agreeing a «drop hands» discontinuance with the claimanin a second application, the firm succeeded in agreeing a «drop hands» discontinuance with the claimanin agreeing a «drop hands» discontinuance with the claimant.

In some cases, an expert will need to update his report before trial to include evidence disclosed since the report was prepared, and in other situations a second supplementary report may have to be prepared, eg on the re-examination of a claimant in a personal injury case, whose prognosis was uncertain at the time of the first reporIn some cases, an expert will need to update his report before trial to include evidence disclosed since the report was prepared, and in other situations a second supplementary report may have to be prepared, eg on the re-examination of a claimant in a personal injury case, whose prognosis was uncertain at the time of the first reporin other situations a second supplementary report may have to be prepared, eg on the re-examination of a claimant in a personal injury case, whose prognosis was uncertain at the time of the first reporin a personal injury case, whose prognosis was uncertain at the time of the first report.

In the second case, the claimant owners of fishing lakes in Norfolk said that their neighbours, in constructing rival lakes (without planning permission) had caused water levels to fall, and hence loss of fish and consequent incomIn the second case, the claimant owners of fishing lakes in Norfolk said that their neighbours, in constructing rival lakes (without planning permission) had caused water levels to fall, and hence loss of fish and consequent incomin Norfolk said that their neighbours, in constructing rival lakes (without planning permission) had caused water levels to fall, and hence loss of fish and consequent incomin constructing rival lakes (without planning permission) had caused water levels to fall, and hence loss of fish and consequent income.

In the event that the NNTT's opinion is against the claimant, he or she will not have any administrative right of appeal or second opinion - he or she will be faced with the prospect of taking his or her case to trial, since all prospects of a mediated outcome will have disappeared.