If scientists find, as one might expect, even more distant stars and galaxies with heavy elements, problems with
the claimed age of the universe will no longer be the secret of a few evolutionists.8
Not exact matches
As opposed to listening to the ramblings
of a bunch
of plagiarists from the dark
ages who thought they could figure out the origins
of the
universe by copying what other religions
of the day
claimed but tweaking it enough to call it «the truth»?
On the other hand, those components
of creationism which involve certain types
of magical events (e.g., the divine creation
of a young
universe with all
of its components bearing the false imprint
of great
age) make the
claims of creationism untestable — making creationism not a theory at all, because theories must be testable!
Physics - lite @ CN77 & Andrew Andrew's Quote «It's not all that pointless, see while you would never be convinced that your bronze
age mythological beliefs about the creation
of the
universe are wrong, since I can rebut (with peer reviewed journal articles no less) any
claim you make, in rather stunning detail, those who are not so well versed on the subject who read the dialogue could be swayed to the side
of science.