Sentences with phrase «claimed average fuel»

The claimed average fuel economy for the 170 - hp diesel - powered Insignia with manual transmission and all - wheel drive is 6.1 l / 100 km, but during our alert test routine of more than 700 kilometers, it settled at around 8.1 l / 100 km.

All up, the CR - Z develops 91kW and 167Nm, with a claimed average fuel consumption figure of 4.7 L / 100 km and average CO2 emissions of 111g / km.

There's one four - cylinder available — the 630i — as well as a 3.0 - litre six - cylinder diesel with claimed average fuel economy of 55.3 mpg.

The claimed average fuel consumption is 6.7 L / 100 km (ADR Combined), and we only crept slightly above this on our week's test, recording an average of 6.9 L / 100 km.

The 1.7 - litre diesel engine comes in two different power outputs, with the less powerful version offering claimed average fuel economy of 67.3 mpg and CO2 emissions of just 110g / km.

That's despite a claimed average fuel consumption of 5.3 l / 100 km (44.4 mpg US) according to the NEDC cycle.

Highlighted by the claimed average fuel consumption of just 10.8 l / 100 km.

Let's get one thing straight: Land Rover's claimed average fuel consumption of 6.5 l / 100 km (equivalent to 171 g CO2 / km) has no basis in reality.

The claimed average fuel consumption is 9.9 l / 100 km (equivalent to 23.7 mpg US), with CO2 emissions of 261 g / km.

What's more impressive is the claimed average fuel economy of the new 6 Series GT model.

The Italians claim an average fuel consumption of 18 mpg.

As per Euro specs, VW claims an average fuel consumption of 62.5 km / l and energy consumption of 12.2 kWh per 100 km, corresponding to CO2 emissions of fewer than 45 g / km.

Not exact matches

(Posted 24 December 2011) Significant current scandals, and those yet to come In no particular order Top salaries and bonuses - boardroom and shareholder individual responsibility The multiple between top and average pay Lawyers fees - the cost of the legal process Medical negligence claims against the NHS Care and treatment in the NHS «No win, no fee» personal injury compensation Democracy and the voting system Lords reform Political party funding The domestic energy market and pricing The Tax system and its inefficiencies and complexities Subsidies for new energy generation schemes The amount of crime fuelled by Drugs The availability of drugs in prison.

But to offset that initial cost there's are the obvious fuel savings that a hybrid can offer and VW claims the GTE can average 166.2 mpg.

At the same time, Porsche claims that average fuel consumption has decreased by sixteen percent.

Claimed combined average fuel consumption is 5.9 litres per 100 km.

The good thing about using a plug - in hybrid setup is improved fuel efficiency, and Land Rover claims the Range Rover Sport P400e averages just 2.8 l / 100 km (101 mpg UK), with corresponding CO2 emissions of only 64 g / km.

Speaking of fuel economy, we averaged 15.2 L / 100 km against a 12.3 L claim on 98 RON PULP.

The Audi sprints from 0 - 100 km / hr in a claimed 7.9 seconds while returning an average fuel efficiency of 11 - 12 km / l.

The manual petrol version would give fuel efficiency of 14.59 km / l while the diesel versions would give average of 22.54 km / l, the company claimed.

For the 1 - liter, three - cylinder turbo petrol unit we tested, Kia's claims involve an average fuel consumption of 5 l / 100 km and we managed to get 6.3 l / 100 km, which is quite good given that we ignored the car's eco-focused suggestions regarding when to shift and so on.

Filling the car with fuel is another regular cost and Ford claims the Mondeo uses 8.5 L / 100 km averaged across city and urban driving, which puts it at the thirstier end of this pack.

New V8 bi-turbo engine in the S 560 Coupe and Cabriolet models Claimed to be one of the world's most ecomomical V8 petrol engines, the latest - generation bi-turbo V8 is said to consume 8 % less fuel than its predecessor (with average fuel consumption of around 35mpg in the Coupe and 34mpg in the Cabrio), thanks partially to active cylinder shutdown.

Fuel economy has improved by a claimed 4.3 mpg at 29.1 mpg, and average CO2 emissions drop from 268g / km to 227g / km.

The 79bhp 1.2 - litre engine returns a claimed average of 57.mpg and emits 115g / km of CO2, while the high - power engine actually returns better fuel economy figures, of 68.9 mpg and 95g / km of CO2.

Average fuel consumption of the Passat GTE claimed by Volkswagen is 2.0 l / 100 km (50 km / l) and 13.0 kWh / 100 km, which corresponds to CO2 emissions of fewer than 45 g / km.

Do the sums and against the claimed fuel consumption average of 9.5 L / 100 km and that's still a range close to 1000 km.

The Motor Report claims that after tracking fuel consumption over a month of use on regional roads, including regular longer runs, the Outlander PHEV averaged 3.8 liters / 100 km.

At the same time a 5.9 L / 100 km combined fuel consumption average is claimed, along with CO2 emissions of just 139g / km.

The Veloce accelerates to100km / h in 5.8 sec and claims a fuel consumption average of 6.8 L / 100 km, the Super diesel claims a 7.1 sec 0 - 100 km / h time and stellar 4.2 L / 100 km fuel consumption and the entry - level 2.0 claims a 6.6 sec 0 - 100 km / h and 6.0 L / 100 km.

That's combined with a claimed 7.7 L / 100 km fuel consumption average.

Neither is particularly fuel efficient; the 3.2 - litre has an official average of 24mpg and costs # 535 to tax per year, while the slightly more economical 3.0 - litre claims 27mpg and will cost # 520 in annual tax.

That V6 now requires 95 RON premium unleaded fuel and returns a claimed average consumption of 8.7 L / 100 km.

On test, we averaged better than the claimed combined fuel consumption figure of 9.4 L / 100 km with an (admittedly freeway - biased) average of 8.6 L / 100 km.

Both cars are front - wheel drive (of course), have a matching MacPherson strut front and multi-link rear suspension concept, a combination of vented front and solid rear disc brakes, electric - assist power steering and even claim an identical 6.0 L / 100 km fuel consumption average (on the cheapest 91 RON fuel).

Incidentally, the X5's claimed combined fuel consumption is identical to the Audi at 5.9 L / 100 km (on test we averaged 11.33) and the fuel tank is the same size too (85 litres).

It accelerates from 0 - 100 km / h in 7.2 secs and has a claimed combined fuel consumption average of 7.5 L / 100 km.

Fuel consumption on test averaged 9.0 L / 100 km, not far off the 7.5 claim.

Although BMW has yet to reveal any theoretical weight figures of its latest concept car, it claims it goes from 0 to 62 mph in less than 8.0 seconds, has a top speed of around 120 mph and enjoys a combined average fuel consumption of more than 94.1 mpg, boasting an electric range of up to 18.6 miles.

On test we couldn't quite match Audi's lofty fuel economy claims, returning only 40.9 mpg — that means you'll be paying an average of # 1,425 per year on fuel.

Fuel consumption figures have also slightly improved to a claimed average of 32mpg with either transmission option.

However, Porsche claims that the 911 Targa 4 fitted with the PDK gearbox and Sport Chrono package has a 0 - 62mph time of 4.8 sec, a top speed of 175mph, combined fuel economy of 32.5 mpg and average CO2 emissions of 204g / km.

Mazda claim a combined fuel consumption average of 8.1 L / 100 km for its manual gearbox - equipped MX - 5 though we achieved a collective 9.4 L during our test.

Audi claim the hybrid can achieve an average fuel consumption figure of 6.2 l / 100 km, while emitting CO2 emissions of 142g / km.

And we didn't come too close to the 4.8 L / 100 km fuel consumption claim with an average 6.1 L / 100 km recorded over a week of urban and freeway driving.

Of course, we never got close to the GTE's claimed European fuel consumption figure of just 1.5 L / 100 km, which equates to CO2 emissions of just 35g / km, averaging 6.4 L / 100 km over a mostly - freeway return run from Munich to Zurich.

«We have seen all of the major auto insurance carriers reporting an increase in the average amount paid on bodily injury claims, fueled by rising medical costs.