Sentences with phrase «claimed average fuel consumption»
All up, the CR - Z develops 91kW and 167Nm, with a claimed average fuel consumption figure of 4.7 L / 100 km and average CO2 emissions of 111g / km.
https://www.motoring.com.au/
The claimed average fuel consumption is 6.7 L / 100 km (ADR Combined), and we only crept slightly above this on our week's test, recording an average of 6.9 L / 100 km.
That's despite a claimed average fuel consumption of 5.3 l / 100 km (44.4 mpg US) according to the NEDC cycle.
Highlighted by the claimed average fuel consumption of just 10.8 l / 100 km.
Let's get one thing straight: Land Rover's claimed average fuel consumption of 6.5 l / 100 km (equivalent to 171 g CO2 / km) has no basis in reality.
The claimed average fuel consumption is 9.9 l / 100 km (equivalent to 23.7 mpg US), with CO2 emissions of 261 g / km.
The Italians claim an average fuel consumption of 18 mpg.
As per Euro specs, VW claims an average fuel consumption of 62.5 km / l and energy consumption of 12.2 kWh per 100 km, corresponding to CO2 emissions of fewer than 45 g / km.
Not exact matches
At the same time, Porsche claims that average fuel consumption has decreased by sixteen percent.
Claimed combined average fuel consumption is 5.9 litres per 100 km.
For the 1 - liter, three - cylinder turbo petrol unit we tested, Kia's claims involve an average fuel consumption of 5 l / 100 km and we managed to get 6.3 l / 100 km, which is quite good given that we ignored the car's eco-focused suggestions regarding when to shift and so on.
New V8 bi-turbo engine in the S 560 Coupe and Cabriolet models Claimed to be one of the world's most ecomomical V8 petrol engines, the latest - generation bi-turbo V8 is said to consume 8 % less fuel than its predecessor (with average fuel consumption of around 35mpg in the Coupe and 34mpg in the Cabrio), thanks partially to active cylinder shutdown.
Average fuel consumption of the Passat GTE claimed by Volkswagen is 2.0 l / 100 km (50 km / l) and 13.0 kWh / 100 km, which corresponds to CO2 emissions of fewer than 45 g / km.
Do the sums and against the claimed fuel consumption average of 9.5 L / 100 km and that's still a range close to 1000 km.
The Motor Report claims that after tracking fuel consumption over a month of use on regional roads, including regular longer runs, the Outlander PHEV averaged 3.8 liters / 100 km.
At the same time a 5.9 L / 100 km combined fuel consumption average is claimed, along with CO2 emissions of just 139g / km.
The Veloce accelerates to100km / h in 5.8 sec and claims a fuel consumption average of 6.8 L / 100 km, the Super diesel claims a 7.1 sec 0 - 100 km / h time and stellar 4.2 L / 100 km fuel consumption and the entry - level 2.0 claims a 6.6 sec 0 - 100 km / h and 6.0 L / 100 km.
That's combined with a claimed 7.7 L / 100 km fuel consumption average.
That V6 now requires 95 RON premium unleaded fuel and returns a claimed average consumption of 8.7 L / 100 km.
On test, we averaged better than the claimed combined fuel consumption figure of 9.4 L / 100 km with an (admittedly freeway - biased) average of 8.6 L / 100 km.
Both cars are front - wheel drive (of course), have a matching MacPherson strut front and multi-link rear suspension concept, a combination of vented front and solid rear disc brakes, electric - assist power steering and even claim an identical 6.0 L / 100 km fuel consumption average (on the cheapest 91 RON fuel).
Incidentally, the X5's claimed combined fuel consumption is identical to the Audi at 5.9 L / 100 km (on test we averaged 11.33) and the fuel tank is the same size too (85 litres).
It accelerates from 0 - 100 km / h in 7.2 secs and has a claimed combined fuel consumption average of 7.5 L / 100 km.
Fuel consumption on test averaged 9.0 L / 100 km, not far off the 7.5 claim.
Although BMW has yet to reveal any theoretical weight figures of its latest concept car, it claims it goes from 0 to 62 mph in less than 8.0 seconds, has a top speed of around 120 mph and enjoys a combined average fuel consumption of more than 94.1 mpg, boasting an electric range of up to 18.6 miles.
Fuel consumption figures have also slightly improved to a claimed average of 32mpg with either transmission option.
Mazda claim a combined fuel consumption average of 8.1 L / 100 km for its manual gearbox - equipped MX - 5 though we achieved a collective 9.4 L during our test.
Audi claim the hybrid can achieve an average fuel consumption figure of 6.2 l / 100 km, while emitting CO2 emissions of 142g / km.
And we didn't come too close to the 4.8 L / 100 km fuel consumption claim with an average 6.1 L / 100 km recorded over a week of urban and freeway driving.
Of course, we never got close to the GTE's claimed European fuel consumption figure of just 1.5 L / 100 km, which equates to CO2 emissions of just 35g / km, averaging 6.4 L / 100 km over a mostly - freeway return run from Munich to Zurich.