Sentences with phrase «claimed by proponents»

«Senator Lesniak has already said that he plans to bring the bill back up at a later date, which is unfortunate since S3041 offers almost none of the pet and consumer protections claimed by proponents, and risked the closure of ethical partners in pet care across the state.»

The second type of advantage claimed by proponents of free trade is economic.

Their work challenged attempts to get rid of the MWP because it contradicted the claim by the proponents of anthropogenic global warming (AGW).

I have written previous posts about my skepticism regarding this program, particularly with respect to the unsupported claims by its proponents that the program will lower legal costs and increase access to justice.

Second, far from being a damning critique of ABS (it actually notes that the claims by both proponents and opponents of ABS are overblown — a point you clearly missed), it merely concludes that in one particular respect ABS has not, at least as yet, achieved one of the possible benfits that some of its proponents have claimed - namely increased accessibility for civil litigation services for lower and middle - income legal consumers.

Not exact matches

Proponents of the deduction counter that the portion of an individual's income claimed by state and local taxes is not really disposable income, and that taxing it at the federal level is double taxation.

In addition, the average fee cost for a Bitcoin transaction has climbed to nearly $ 5, going against the initial claims by Bitcoin proponents that the currency would be faster and cheaper to use than existing credit cards.

Another claim by the bill's proponents argued that the legislation would expand lending opportunities for consumers who are now underserved by financial institutions.

Its proponents claim that the tradition is dominated by patriarchy and exclusion, the product of oppressive forces linked to geographical location, social class, race, and gender.

I would «base [my] info on inre the non-existence of God, heaven and hell, etc» on the absolute lack of even a shred of hard verifiable evidence for these extraordinary claims, and the fact that even after thousands of years of frantic and determined efforts by the most ardent and intelligent proponents of these claims, they still have been completely unable to demonstrate them in any testable manner.

(A decision for same - sex marriage by a state could as in the case of Massachusetts, preempts the debate in that state, but it is less far - reaching because it leaves other states to arrive at a different conclusion — unless, as some same - sex - marriage proponents have claimed, other states are required to recognize such marriages under the Constitution's requirement of giving «full faith and credit» to other states» proceedings.)

With apparently some significant success, evangelical and Catholic supporters of Senator Obama attempted to hijack the language of the culture of life, claiming that they are the authentic pro-life proponents because, by reducing poverty and expanding comprehensive sex education, Obama will decrease the number of abortions.

So after all, this ordinary world may not be so flat, dull and uninteresting as some proponents of transcendence claim, since by walking and running we may see and enjoy much which, in our haste to leap into transcendence, we have overlooked or deprecated.

Using the standard spiel of proponents of legalized betting on jai alai and other sports, Senator Friedland renewed the call for building frontons in Jersey by claiming that the revenues the state would derive from the pari - mutuel betting would «be dedicated to helping the elderly and the medically and physically handicapped.»

Such thinking leads to or supports things like far - right Hindu nationalism, for example, or absurd claims that epistemic violence is the same or worse (as Spivak once famously claimed) than actual violence, or harmful rejections of science, or the very essentialism denied by its proponents.

Indeed, its proponents hoped to «claim on behalf of the Established Church of England the same liberty as has been enjoyed for over 200 years by the Established Church of Scotland».

Proponents of a Brexit claimed that the UK was paying a large sum of money each week, which could be avoided by leaving the EU.

In fact, the CRF curves presented by some of the key cosmic - ray hypothesis proponents, Marsh & Svensmark, do not exhibit any trend, yet it has been claimed that CRF is responsible for the most recent warming (Marsh & Svensmark say that the wiggles correlate, but don't discuss the [or lack of] observed trends).

While this is not a comprehensive analysis of the claims made by apple cider vinegar proponents, these are some of the most popular uses for the liquid.

Proponents claim that ketogenic diets may help prevent cancers by addressing all of these aspects.

The reason for these studies is partially because of some of the health claims made by proponents of infrared science technology.

Proponents of this diet claim that by restricting your calorie intake to once per day, you ensure that your body stays in a constant state of burning...

Proponents of the practice claim that it quiets the sympathetic nervous system and aids in rehabilitating patients suffering injuries, stroke, anxiety or chronic pain such as that caused by fibromyalgia.

I would guess that the information in this video is just as valid as any claims made by paleo diet proponents.

The claims made by proponents of juice fasting, which you have enumerated above, are indeed largely unsubstantiated, or not founded in fact; however, juice fasting is highly beneficial for completely different reasons than those often given by its proponents.

While Prof. Greene positions himself as dedicated to scholarly rigor, he falls into his own logical trap when challenging our claims about states without teacher unions having the lowest achievement rate according to the measures favored by the standardized test proponents.

The claim by charter proponents that charter school students» performance is superior to public district school students is a misconception.

Proponents claim ed tech can enhance learning, bring educational material to resource - poor districts and solve the educational difficulties faced by students in rural areas.

Its proponents claim that it is a continuous process of what they call «unlearning,» «learning,» and «relearning,» «reflection,» «evaluation,» and the impact that these actions have on the students, in particular students whom they believe have been historically and continue to be disenfranchised by what they call «traditional schooling.»

Proponents of the arts claim with equal vigor that by exposing students in some schools to a rich, varied curriculum and consigning students in other schools to endless reading and math drills, we are only exacerbating opportunity gaps based on race and economics.

This is counter to the claims continuously made by VAM proponents, including folks like Thomas Kane — economics professor from Harvard University who directed the $ 45 million worth of Measures of Effective Teaching (MET) studies for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

It now looks certain that New York State will not reach the minimum 95 percent level that Common Core test proponents claim is «mandated» by federal and state law.

In the event that stock valuations return to normal levels in days to come (a likely event, according to the historical data), many people are going to be hurt by the «highly misleading» (William Bernstein's words) SWR claims that have been put forward by proponents of conventional methodology SWR studies.

The basic nutrient requirements of our pets are well - established by decades of research, and despite the claims of BARF proponents there is no evidence that nutritional disease are widespread among pets fed balanced commercial diets.

Proponents of this theory will often further defend it with a (debated) claim that while ridgebacks are versatile and use all their senses, their first and strongest inclination is to find game by sight — which itself is considered normal for dogs of any type, when the game is actually in sight.

The early papers by Kenneth Richards and others did indeed concentrate on the obnoxious thermal magnitude claims of early CAGW proponents.

These inaccuracies are merely the topline claims most commonly recycled by the media and proponents of government - imposed action on climate change.

I'm a big proponent of Feynman's and Schneider's descriptions of scientific ethics, and by their definitions the authors of the IPCC reports are «telling scary stories, etc.; things Schneider claims are acceptable when one wants to make the world a better place.

For most of the 35 years, proponents of climate change policies have usually responded to these arguments by making counter «factual» claims such as climate policies will increase jobs or trigger economic growth.

It is a recent discovery that the oceans can act for decades at a time as net absorbers OR net emitters of previously accumulated solar energy on a vast and highly variable scale yet AGW proponents still ignore the overwhelming evidence because to acknowledge it would destroy years of fond memories of a publicly funded gold rush encouraged by their fanciful claims to understand climate and be in a position to influence it.

However, pipeline proponents claim that the ten times larger bonus achieved by the TMX project will have no effect on future production.

Because a high percentage of the arguments made by most proponents of climate change policy have been focused on adverse climate impacts that citizens will experience where they live, while ignoring the harms to hundreds of millions of vulnerable poor people around the world that are being affected by GHG emissions from all - high emitting nations, along with claims that mainstream climate science is credible and has been undermined by morally reprehensible tactics, there is a need to make more people aware of:

It is not enough for proponents of climate change policies to simply make counter scientific and economic «factual» arguments to the scientific and economic claims of the climate change policy opponents, advocates for climate policies need to help citizens understand what interests are responsible for the disinformation that is the basis for the false arguments made by opponents of climate change policies, why the tactics used the opponents of climate change policies are morally reprehensible, and why the arguments of those opposing climate change policies will continue to create huge injustices and immense suffering in the world.

It is my contention (and that of many others) that in fact this is the default null hypothesis and until proponents of the anthropogenic global warming hyothesis come up with some better evidence to back up their claims of imminent dangerous warming driven by co2 and a water vapour feedback to its increasing levels, the null hypothesis is the best one we have.

Everywhere one looks one sees AGW proponents invoking terms like consensus, denial, settled science, vast majority of scientists, 97 % of scientists, and many others like this, all by way of claiming that there is no scientific debate.

So the claim is contingent on the accompanying timeline, which doesn't seem to be stated by the proponents.

Proponents of the claim humans are the cause of warming and the cooperative media react by trying to deflect, divert and perpetuate fear.

The fact of the matter is that the claims of the proponents are, in essentially every case, understated by 50 % or more, as the above shows.

The proponents claim that they can offset such emissions by buying wind energy from Nevada, etc..

To that end, would it not be helpful to have a library that could pull together all the refutations of the claims that are made by proponents of CAGW?