Plus, it's also fairly efficient by class standards, with
claimed city and highway mpg figures of 22 and 31 respectively.
Not exact matches
Bibles in every motel room God on our money Prayer before public events Christian cable networks 24/7 Discounts on insurance for being christian Churches every 6 blocks in every
city over 100,000 Laws that prevent non-christians from holding public office Christian bookstores in every town over 12,000 God in the Pledge of Allegiance Televangelists 24/7 Christian billboards along the
highway advertising Vacation Bible School
and «Repent or go to He.ll» Federally recognized christian holiday Radioevangelists 24/7 Religious organizations are tax free 75 % of the population
claims to be christian National day of prayer God in the National Anthem Weekday christian education for elementary students.
Bibles in every motel room God on our money Moments of silence (prayer) before public events Christian cable networks 24/7 Discounts on insurance for being christian Churches every 6 blocks in every
city over 100,000 Christian bookstores in every town over 12,000 God in The Pledge of Allegiance Televangelists 24/7 Christian billboards along the
highway advertising VBS
and «Repent or Go to Hell» Federally recognized Christian holiday Radioeveangelists 24/7 Religious organizations are tax free 75 % of the population
claims to be Christian National day of prayer God in the National Anthem Want more?
BMW
claims a zero - to - 62 mph time of 6.1 seconds with a six - speed manual,
and while the company isn't talking about fuel economy numbers, we expect the X1 with an eight - speed automatic to return about 22 mpg in the
city and 29 mpg on the
highway.
Acura
claims V - 8 performance with four - cylinder fuel - efficiency,
and indeed, the engine - motor combo produces 377 horsepower
and 377 lb - ft, with EPA ratings of 28 mpg in
city driving, 32 mpg on the
highway,
and 30 mpg combined.
Ford is still
claiming a combined figure of 43 mpg for the C - Max, with the adjusted figures being a
claimed 45 mpg
city and 40 mpg
highway.
Infiniti also
claims that the 2019 QX50 FWD SUV gets 27/27 mpg
city /
highway miles
and the AWD version gets 26/26 mpg
city /
highway miles.
VW
claims that the four - door stick - shift car can sprint from 0 to 60 mph in just 6.7 seconds, while returning 21 mpg in the
city and 31 mpg on the
highway.
Pre-owned MPG
claims are based on EPA estimated
city and highway ratings when vehicle was new.
This model
claims a mileage of 20 mpg in the
city drive
and 25 mpg on the
highway drive.
Of course,
claimed fuel numbers rarely match real - life numbers,
and our Tacoma measured 15.2 L / 100 km during a two - thirds / one - third mix of
city /
highway driving, while its trip computer recorded a more optimistic 14.1 L / 100 km over the same time period.
Alright, let me be honest
and tell you a few things that I dislike about this car: - Gas Mileage (Hyundai
claims it gives you 25 mpg in the
city, which is not true, I get not more than 23 mpg in the
city for sure)- Traction Control (The traction can not handle the acceleration
and the wheels would start spinning, even on the dry roads, not sure what to blame)- USB port - The built in USB port does not support android, at least not in my case, therefore I have to rely on Bluetooth or AUX)- Dull Alloy Wheels - The dullness of alloy wheels for the SE trim does not compliment the car over all, but eh, I can't complain much as it is a BASE model Now, the things I absolutely love about this car: - Great Turn Radius - Beautiful LED lights (even with base model)-
Highway mileage (35 mpg even driving at 75 miles an hour, you might get better than 37 mpg if you drive at 55 miles an hour)- Spacious trunk - Great leg room for rear seats - Just enough power to accelerate quickly
and merge on to the
highways / freeways - Amazing Brakes - Sports, ECO
and Normal Mode (For those who do not know, once switched to SPORTS mode, the car's steering becomes stiff as well as the engine along with the help of transmission helps you accelerate the car faster, you actually feel like driving a sports car.
Used car MPG
claims are based on EPA estimated
city and highway ratings when vehicle was new.
It's also, surprisingly, not too inefficient in comparison with the 1.8 - liter engine, with
claims of 27mpg in the
city and 33mpg on the
highway for automatic models (adding a manual transmission drops both figures by one mpg each).
The EnerGuide fuel economy rating for the Laramie's Hemi is 17.2 L / 100 km in the
city, 12.7 L / 100 km on the
highway, while the EcoDiesel
claims 12.1 L
and 8.8 L, respectively; note that the diesel
claims better
city fuel economy than the Hemi does on the
highway.
That falls significantly below the EPA's estimates of 28
city mpg
and 40
highway, but if experience has taught me anything about three Car Tech editors sharing a car that
claims a sporty pedigree, it's that our observed fuel economy is usually something of a worst - case scenario.
Even by the standards of comparable engines in this segment, the
claimed economy figures of 14mpg in the
city and 19mpg on the
highway aren't especially impressive (a like - for - like Chevrolet Suburban, for instance, will return 16mpg in the
city and 23mpg on the
highway).
Fuel Economy: The company
claims 23.08 kmpl fuel efficiency
and we got an overall mileage of about 20.2 kmpl which is a mix of
highway driving at high speeds
and city driving.
If you stick with the five - speed manual, Volkswagen
claims an EPA fuel rating of 28 miles per gallon in the
city, 40 on the
highway,
and 33 combined.
Scion
claims the car is capable of 42 mpg
highway and 31
city.
The range - topping extended - wheelbase 4x4 version can only lay
claim to 15 mpg
city and 19 mpg
highway, for a combined 16 mpg.
Though it's not inherently a bad feature, we feel the traction benefits are outweighed by its cost ($ 1,850)
and impact to fuel economy (26 / 31mpg for the
city and highway respectively, versus the front - wheel drive Juke's
claimed 28 / 32mpg ratings).
It also has the best fuel economy of any Ford F - 150, with
claims of up to 19mpg in the
city and 26mpg on the
highway, making it one of the most frugal gasoline engines available in this class.
Fuel economy also isn't brilliant, with
claims of 17mpg in the
city and 26mpg on the
highway for the front - wheel drive model (adding the optional all - wheel drive increases fuel consumption to 16mpg
city / 23mpg
highway) being quite disappointing in a class where 20mpg + for
city driving is becoming the norm.
If I had realized or been told that the only way to get the mpg on the sticker of the vehicle, which
claims 28
city - 32 combined -38-40
highway mpg, you have to drive in an enclosed laboratory without using your AC, keep the windows rolled up,
and use only Chevron Techron gas, I would have never purchased this vehicle.
Kia
claims the combination of direct fuel injection
and stop - start will offer 30MPG
City / 40MPG on the
highway in both 6 speed manual
and automatic transmissions.
The 1.0 - liter boasts the best
claimed consumption figures of 30
city MPG
and 40
highway MPG with a manual gearbox.
Advertising an EPA - rated 47 mpg for
city and highway, the strategy for the C - MAX Hybrid has been working so far, but Ford fell into hot water when its
claims were said to be overstated.
With EPA ratings of 17 miles - per - gallon
city and 29
highway, Chevy
claims this as the most efficient sports car on the market.
And, as with pretty much every engine Lexus makes, it's very smooth and refined, and the claimed fuel economy (20mpg city / 29mpg highway for rear - wheel drive cars; 19mpg city / 27mpg highway with all - wheel drive installed) is also pretty good by six - cylinder executive sedan standar
And, as with pretty much every engine Lexus makes, it's very smooth
and refined, and the claimed fuel economy (20mpg city / 29mpg highway for rear - wheel drive cars; 19mpg city / 27mpg highway with all - wheel drive installed) is also pretty good by six - cylinder executive sedan standar
and refined,
and the claimed fuel economy (20mpg city / 29mpg highway for rear - wheel drive cars; 19mpg city / 27mpg highway with all - wheel drive installed) is also pretty good by six - cylinder executive sedan standar
and the
claimed fuel economy (20mpg
city / 29mpg
highway for rear - wheel drive cars; 19mpg
city / 27mpg
highway with all - wheel drive installed) is also pretty good by six - cylinder executive sedan standards.
Plus, with
claims of 24 / 26mpg
city and 30 / 33mpg
highway for front - wheel drive
and all - wheel drive versions respectively, the Mazda CX - 5 with this engine is still fairly frugal.
Plus, with
claimed economy figures 23 / 31mpg for the
city and highway respectively for the rear - wheel drive models (or 22/28 for Q50 2.0 t variants that comes with the optional all - wheel drive system), the Infiniti is fairly frugal — though it's worth pointing out that the like - for - like BMW 3 Series, Mercedes - Benz C - Class
and Audi A4 are, on paper at least, able to go that bit further per gallon of fuel.
With
claims of 22mpg in the
city and 30mpg on the
highway in the more efficient rear - wheel drive guise (adding all - wheel drive drops both figures by a couple of miles - per - gallon), it's comfortably the most efficient engine in the range,
and better in many cases than what smaller, turbocharged four - cylinder gasoline engines in rival cars can muster.
Of course, being the smallest engine in the Lexus GS range, the 2.0 - liter turbocharged gasoline unit is also one of the most efficient in the line - up, with the
claimed economy figures of 22mpg in the
city and 33mpg on the
highway making the car in this guise one of the more efficient sedans in this class.
With
claims of 26mpg in the
city and 35mpg on the
highway, the Mazda CX - 5 with this engine is amongst the most efficient cars in this class.
Downsizing has also resulted in some rather impressive fuel economy figures: the official stats
claim the front - wheel - drive Mazda CX - 9 can return 22mpg in the
city and 28mpg on the
highway, with all - wheel - drive models sacrificing just one mpg in both categories for their superior on - paper abilities in more adverse weather conditions.
Plus, with
claims of 21mpg in the
city and 29mpg on the
highway, the Audi A7 is quite economical by class standards (not that many people who are spending at least $ 68,000 on a car will mind about the fuel consumption levels).
Running costs are also pretty disappointing by class standards, with Audi
claiming an above - average 20 / 28mpg in the
city and on the
highway respectively.
The official stats
claim the front - wheel - drive Mazda CX - 9 can return 22mpg in the
city and 28mpg on the
highway.
You don't get the same get - up -
and - go as the 2.7, but there's still power enough here to keep you comfortably at
highway speeds, with better fuel economy to boot (Ford
claims 13.6
and 9.8 L / 100 km for the Sport in
city and highway conditions respectively,
and 11.8 / 8.4 for the Titanium with the 2.0).
On the contrary, the larger engine's
claimed figures of 23mpg in the
city and 30mpg on the
highway are someway short of the 24mpg
city / 33mpg
highway that the 2.0 - liter can manage in its least efficient guise — which can be improved to 27mpg
city / 34mpg
highway if you swap out the 2.0 - liter's standard - fit five - speed manual transmission with the automatic.
The vehicle comes with a maximum fuel tank capacity of 72 - litres
and the
claimed fuel efficiency is 5.95 km / l in the
city and 8.08 km / l on the
highways.
As noted in our review of the standard C - Max Hybrid, there are several class action suits against Ford
claiming that owners can't come close to the 47 mpg EPA rating for
city,
highway and combined driving.
Mated to a responsive, paddle - shiftable 8 - speed Tiptronic automatic transmission teamed with Audi's Quattro AWD system, the engine takes this handsome
and notably lighter hauler from 0 - 60 mph in a
claimed 5.7 seconds, gives it a stellar 7,700 - pound towing capability,
and earns 19 mpg
city / 25 mpg
highway fuel economy numbers from the EPA compared to the 16/22 comparative stats of the previous - generation Q7 with the same powertrain.
of torque,
and consumes a
claimed 9.4 L / 100 km in the
city and 6.1 on the
highway.
With
claims of 18mpg in the
city and 28mpg on the
highway, the Chrysler Pacifica is amongst one of the most efficient vehicles in this segment,
and it's worth pointing out that more frugal competitors like the Toyota Sienna can in most cases only go one mile further for every gallon of fuel used.
Fuel economy is commendable though with a
claimed 31mpg for
city and 39mpg for
highway driving.
Despite its lack of outright speed, the Evoque is more than capable in both
city and highway motoring
and the
claimed average 23mpg rating is commendable too.
Smart
claim a range of up to 80 miles for an EPA rated 134/102 MPG equivalent on the
city and highway respectively.
A more representative drive afterward with mixed
city crawling
and highway traffic yielded an easy 31.5 mpg, so Kia's economy
claims seem well - justified.