Sentences with phrase «claimed combined fuel»

It can also manage a claimed combined fuel efficiency figure of 24.8 mpg.

Claimed combined fuel consumption is 8.3 L / 100 km — I'm not thinking they had much fun posting that number.

It accelerates from 0 - 100 km / h in 7.2 secs and has a claimed combined fuel consumption average of 7.5 L / 100 km.

Incidentally, the X5's claimed combined fuel consumption is identical to the Audi at 5.9 L / 100 km (on test we averaged 11.33) and the fuel tank is the same size too (85 litres).

On test, we averaged better than the claimed combined fuel consumption figure of 9.4 L / 100 km with an (admittedly freeway - biased) average of 8.6 L / 100 km.

As a result, the claimed combined fuel consumption is just 9.1 liters / 100 km, with corresponding CO2 emissions of 206 g / km.

However, when you compare the X-TRAIL with the equivalent CX - 5 2.5, which has a claimed combined fuel consumption of just 7.4 L / 100 km, it doesn't look so fantastic.

Claimed combined fuel economy of the i8 is 104.9 MPG, and electric only range is 22 miles.

It delivers a claimed combined fuel economy figure of 43.5 mpg with a CO2 output of 171g / km but will still propel the newly lightened Discovery to 60mph from rest in a brisk 8.0 sec.

Even the more powerful 20d diesel with an automatic» box is impressively efficient on tax and has a claimed combined fuel economy of 67.3 mpg.

Factor in a marginally more slippery shape (drag coefficient drops from 0.25 to 0.24) and the Prius» claimed combined fuel economy improves from 4.7 to 4.5 L / 100 km.

Claimed combined fuel consumption also drops from 7.7 L / 100 km to 6.8 L / 100 km for the coupe and from 7.9 L / 100 km to 6.9 L / 100 km for the roadster.

MPG and running costs > Audi claims a combined fuel economy figure of 40.4 mpg and 162g / km of CO2 for the S - tronic.

Fiat claims a combined fuel consumption figure of 74.3 mpg and CO2 of 90g / km for the 84bhp TwinAir, while the more powerful two - pot manages 67.3 mpg.

Mazda claim a combined fuel consumption average of 8.1 L / 100 km for its manual gearbox - equipped MX - 5 though we achieved a collective 9.4 L during our test.

Not exact matches

Acura claims V - 8 performance with four - cylinder fuel - efficiency, and indeed, the engine - motor combo produces 377 horsepower and 377 lb - ft, with EPA ratings of 28 mpg in city driving, 32 mpg on the highway, and 30 mpg combined.

Combined fuel consumption is a claimed 38.2 mpg with CO2 emissions pegged at 171g / km.

If fuel costs are a priority, the front - wheel - drive e-Capability diesel returns a claimed combined 67.3 mpg.

MPG and running costs > If fuel costs are a priority, the front - wheel - drive e-Capability diesel returns a claimed combined 67.3 mpg.

Automakers don't raise engine output without simultaneously improving fuel economy these days, and Audi claims a 23 percent increase in mileage, which we estimate will translate to an EPA combined rating of 18 mpg versus 15 mpg for the previous S8.

The diesel offers the stronger performance; although 0 - 62mph times are the same for both engines at a claimed 11.5 sec, however, the diesel's fuel economy is almost 25 per cent better, achieving a claimed 70.6 mpg combined, compared to 53.3 mpg.

Combined fuel economy is now a claimed 20 mpg.

Sure enough, Chrysler claims the Two - Mode system improves city fuel economy by 40 per cent, while the trucks» combined city / highway figures jump by 25 per cent.

Volkswagen claims the Polo will sip fuel at a rate of 48mpg when driven on the combined cycle, however like most turbocharged engines it will consume significantly more when driven with enthusiasm.

2018 Audi TT RS Coupe pricing and specifications: Price: $ 137,611 (plus ORCs) Engine: 2.5 - litre five - cylinder turbo - petrol Transmission: Seven - speed dual - clutch Output: 294kW / 480Nm Fuel: 8.4 L / 100 km (ADR Combined) 0 - 100 km / h: 3.7 sec (claimed)

2018 R8 Spyder pricing and specifications: Price: $ 388,500 (plus ORCs) Engine: 5.2 - litre V10 petrol Transmission: Seven - speed dual - clutch Output: 397kW / 540Nm Fuel: 11.7 L / 100 km (ADR Combined) 0 - 100 km / h: 3.6 sec (claimed)

2018 RS 5 Coupe pricing and specifications: Price: $ 156,600 (plus ORCs) Engine: 2.9 - litre V6 twin - turbo petrol Transmission: Eight - speed automatic Output: 331kW / 600Nm Fuel: 8.8 L / 100 km (ADR Combined) 0 - 100 km / h: 3.9 sec (claimed)

2018 RS 7 Sportback performance pricing and specifications: Price: $ 257,426 (plus ORCs) Engine: 4.0 - litre V8 twin - turbo petrol Transmission: Eight - speed automatic Output: 445kW / 700Nm Fuel: 9.6 L / 100 km (ADR Combined) 0 - 100 km / h: 3.7 sec (claimed)

Claimed combined average fuel consumption is 5.9 litres per 100 km.

2018 RS 6 Avant performance pricing and specifications: Price: $ 248,726 (plus ORCs) Engine: 4.0 - litre V8 twin - turbo petrol Transmission: Eight - speed automatic Output: 445kW / 700Nm Fuel: 9.7 L / 100 km (ADR Combined) 0 - 100 km / h: 3.7 sec (claimed)

The engine is also fuel efficient, claiming as low as 7.2 L / 100 km combined fuel consumption based on the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC).

The 237bhp diesel, badged 25d, brings a disappointingly large drop in claimed fuel economy figures, only managing 53.3 mpg combined as a rear - wheel drive car and emitting 129g / km.

Fuel economy is good, but nowhere near the claimed 69 mpg combined figure.

With a combined fuel economy rating of 4.1 L / 100 km, the Hybrid Blue will be the most efficient non-EV in Canada, and its Hybrid stablemate claiming runner - up status with a 4.3 rating.

Hyundai claims that new Santa Fe has a fuel economy of 30 mpg in the combined driving.

2016 HSV GTS GEN - F2 specs: Price: $ 98,490 (plus on - road costs) Engine: 6.2 - litre supercharged V8 petrol Output: 430kW / 740Nm (claimed) Transmission: Six - speed manual Fuel: 15.3 L / 100 km (ADR Combined) CO2: 363g / km (ADR Combined) Safety rating: Five - star ANCAP

2016 Ford Falcon XR6 Sprint specs: Price: $ 54,990 (plus on - road costs) Engine: 4.0 - litre turbocharged in - line six - cylinder petrol Output: 325kW / 576Nm, 370kW / 650Nm in overboost (claimed) Transmission: Six - speed automatic Fuel: 12.8 L / 100 km (ADR Combined) CO2: 304g / km (ADR Combined) Safety rating: Five - star ANCAP

2016 Ford Falcon XR8 Sprint specs: Price: $ 62,190 (plus on - road costs) Engine: 5.0 - litre supercharged V8 petrol Output: 345kW / 575Nm, 400kW / 650Nm in overboost (claimed) Transmission: Six - speed automatic Fuel: 14L / 100 km (ADR Combined) CO2: 333g / km (ADR Combined) Safety rating: Five - star ANCAP

The company claims an ADR Combined fuel economy figure of 6.5 L / 100 km on the rolling road.

If you stick with the five - speed manual, Volkswagen claims an EPA fuel rating of 28 miles per gallon in the city, 40 on the highway, and 33 combined.

VMT claims the Universal Transmission combines the best of high performance and high torque automatic transmissions with the fuel efficient, constant engagement offered by CVTs (continuously variable transmissions).

Porsche claims it's capable of a combined fuel consumption of 2.5 l / 100 km (equivalent to 94 mpg US or 15.9 kWh / 100 km) according to the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) for plug - in hybrid models, with corresponding CO2 emissions 56 g / km.

Under load, the Optima «GT» did use the most fuel of our group at 13.1 L / 100 km against an ADR combined sticker claim of 8.1 L / 100 km.

Fuel consumption is a claimed 6.6 L / 100 km (ADR Combined).

Although capable of running 91RON fuel, Hyundai's claimed 9.2 L / 100 km combined fuel economy indicates that the performance comes at a price.

The manufacturer claims an ADR combined - cycle fuel consumption figure of 6.3 L / 100 km with CO2 emissions of 165g / km.

Coupled with a nine - speed automatic that shuffles drive to all four wheels, the S 63 claims a 0 - 100 km / h time of just 3.5 seconds, a top speed of 250km / h and a claimed fuel consumption figure of 9.3 L / 100 km combined.

The claimed 0 - 100 km / h time for the Corsa is set at 10.4 seconds, but the overtaking acceleration and in - gear punch are the real main attractions — whilst fuel consumption is also particularly tidy at a claimed 5l / 100 km on a combined cycle.

At the same time, it is claimed to return combined fuel economy of 39.9 mpg (US) on the European cycle.

A combined fuel consumption number of 3.4 L / 100 km is claimed.