Sentences with phrase «claimed fuel consumption»

It comes with two gasoline engines — 1.2 - litre and 1.4 - litre — and a turbo diesel of 1.3 litres with a claimed fuel consumption of only 4.2 litres / 100 kilometres in combined city and highway driving.

Claimed fuel consumption is just 5.2 L / 100 km, which equates to CO2 emissions of only 120g / km.

The economy champion is the 1.5 - liter diesel, with the claimed fuel consumption going as low as 4 liters / 100 km (with corresponding CO2 emissions of 103 g / km).

But here comes the sweetener, claimed fuel consumption on the combined cycle is 7.0 l / 100 km for the manual and 6.9 l / 100 km for the double - clutch jobbie.

The eight - speed automatic transmission is peach - fuzz smooth and the 82.5 litre fuel tank provides a decent range, more than 500 km, if you can achieve the claimed fuel consumption of 14.2 L / 100 km.

As noted previously, tuning work on the CVTs has eked out claimed fuel consumption improvements for both the 2.0 — which drops from 6.9 L / 100 km and 160g / km of CO2 to 6.7 and 156 — and the 2.4, which drops from 7.5 L / 100 km and 174g CO2 per km to 7.2 and 166.

Icing on the cake here is claimed fuel consumption that's just 4.8 L / 100 km for all models except the 81TSI manual (4.9 L / 100 km), which is not far off the discontinued 1.6 - litre diesel's figures, thanks in part to idle - stop and regenerative braking functions.

The claimed fuel consumption figure is an impressive 25mpg in combined city / highway driving which is identical to the lighter coupe.

Active models are fitted with a 2.4 - litre four - cylinder petrol engine developing 138kW and 241Nm, delivering a claimed fuel consumption of 9.4 L / 100 km combined.

You can add ALL4 four - wheel drive for a # 1,410 premium, which shaves 0.2 second from the 0 - 62mph time but hits economy, reducing claimed fuel consumption to 40.9 mpg and upping emissions to 159g / km.

Do the sums and against the claimed fuel consumption average of 9.5 L / 100 km and that's still a range close to 1000 km.

With the adoption of the CVT and various tweaks, the claimed fuel consumption drops from 10.3 L / 100 km to 9.9, while emissions remain the same at 242g / km — all on a diet of regular (91 RON) unleaded fuel.

Hooked up to a six - speed automatic transmission as standard — instead of its predecessor's CVT auto — it reduces claimed fuel consumption to 5.9 L / 100 km.

Its 78.5 mpg claimed fuel consumption and 19 % BiK impresses — even if its CVT automatic gearbox doesn't.

Claimed fuel consumption, according to the Japanese 10 - 15 mode, is 15.2 km / l for the 2WD model and 15.0 km / l for the 4WD variant.

Coupled with a nine - speed automatic that shuffles drive to all four wheels, the S 63 claims a 0 - 100 km / h time of just 3.5 seconds, a top speed of 250km / h and a claimed fuel consumption figure of 9.3 L / 100 km combined.

Compared to its predecessor, the latest i30 doesn't seem to work as hard to deliver the same performance, yet claimed fuel consumption is lineball (7.4 L / 100 km current v 7.3 outgoing)-- something we intend keeping an eye on over the course of this long - term test.

What we can confirm, though, is that BMW's claimed fuel consumption doesn't happen in real life.

It'll dispatch the 0 - 100 km / h sprint in 7.6 seconds and has a claimed fuel consumption rating of 7.6 L / 100 km.

The sports activity vehicle is equipped with a 2.0 litre four - cylinder BMW TwinPower Turbo engine, offering 184 hp and 270 Nm for output numbers, and performance figures include a 0 - 100 km / h time of 8.6 seconds and a claimed fuel consumption of 7.5 l per 100 km.

Claimed fuel consumption is 7.7 litres per 100 km for the Boxster and 8.0 litres per 100 km for the Boxster S. Also new to this model is Porsche Torque Vectoring with a mechanical rear axle diff lock.

The claimed fuel consumption for the Hyundai Elantra is 16.3 km / l for the petrol variant and 22.7 km / l for the diesel variant.

It can't match the PHEV on paper, but its claimed fuel consumption of 53.3 mpg is pretty good for an SUV this size, although its 139g / km CO2 emissions figure still means a relatively pricey 29 % Benefit - in - Kind (BiK) rating for company - car drivers.

Most efficient is the less powerful engine with a stop / start system fitted; claimed fuel consumption is 67.3 mpg, while 95g / km CO2 emissions currently ensure UK road tax is free.

Previously claiming a fuel consumption figure of 5.9 litres / 100 km, the 318i is now good for 5.1 litres / 100 km.

The 1.2 produces 97kW and 205Nm and claims fuel consumption of 5.6 L / 100 km (auto) in combined - cycle testing.

The Veloce accelerates to100km / h in 5.8 sec and claims a fuel consumption average of 6.8 L / 100 km, the Super diesel claims a 7.1 sec 0 - 100 km / h time and stellar 4.2 L / 100 km fuel consumption and the entry - level 2.0 claims a 6.6 sec 0 - 100 km / h and 6.0 L / 100 km.

Nissan claims a fuel consumption of 23 km / l for the diesel version and 18 km / l for the petrol version.

Mercedes is claiming a fuel consumption between 3.9 and 4.3 l / 100 km, but this is not quite realistic in real driving conditions.

For now, the range - topping triple - turbo diesel six - cylinder M50d ($ 147,900) sits at the top of the X5 tree, which powers to 100km / h in just 5.3 seconds while claiming fuel consumption of 6.7 L / 100 km.

Not exact matches

They took particular issue with one excerpt in the book claiming the buses were «reported to be falling short in their fuel consumption and emission figures, in some cases worryingly.»

This could be fed back into the car's battery to power its onboard electrical systems, reducing fuel consumption by up to 15 per cent, he claims.

The team claim the system will reduce fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions by more than 30 per cent compared with conventional gasoline engines.

The anonymous source claims that «While 1,000 bhp is possible, fuel consumption, emissions and engine tolerances will see a more realistic figure of 800bhp targeted.»

Of course, the previous - generation S6 used the 5.2 - litre V10 engine found, in modified form, in the Audi R8 and Lamborghini Gallardo, but the new V8 promises stronger pace with a claimed 25 per cent reduction in fuel consumption.

Combined fuel consumption is a claimed 38.2 mpg with CO2 emissions pegged at 171g / km.

Below our trio sit the big - engined diesel variants of the same cars, so smug in their claims that «in the real world» they're just as quick, while offering lower CO2 and fuel consumption.

Speaking of fuel economy, Ferrari claims a 30 percent reduction in fuel consumption, but this wasn't achieved by absurdly long gear ratios.

At the same time, Porsche claims that average fuel consumption has decreased by sixteen percent.

Fiat claims a combined fuel consumption figure of 74.3 mpg and CO2 of 90g / km for the 84bhp TwinAir, while the more powerful two - pot manages 67.3 mpg.

Fuel consumption and CO2 emissions are claimed to be 91mpg and just 71g / km respectively.

Matched with the Quattro drivetrain, this engine delivers sports car performance and, Audi claims, overall fuel consumption of 33 mpg.

The Italians claim an average fuel consumption of 18 mpg.

The SLK 55 AMG is the perfect embodiment of the new AMG brand claim of «Driving Performance»: in the compact high - performance roadster segment there is nothing to compare to its combination of tangible driving dynamics, superior sportiness, unique high - technology and low fuel consumption.

Phase one consists of a simple ECU remap, which BBR claims not only boosts peak outputs to 290bhp and 330lb - ft (gains of 34bhp and 50lb - ft) but also improves throttle response and the response of the turbo boost map, whilst reducing fuel consumption at cruising speeds.

Ford claims an overall fuel consumption of 19 km / l to for the petrol Freestyle.

It's enough, though, to bring claimed CO2 emissions and fuel consumption to a level far superior to conventional petrol models in the range.

With one turbo, the engine delivers 115 or 136 HP and claims a very low fuel consumption (emissions of 98 or 99 g / km).

The BMW TwinPower diesel engine is also the most upgraded engine in attendance, pushing out 190 hp / 400 Nm over the previous 320d's 180 hp / 380 Nm of torque, bettering fuel consumption by 0.5 litres / 100 km to 4.0 litres / 100 km, and is speedier over a 100 km / h dash by 0.2 seconds for a claimed 7.2 seconds.

Claimed combined fuel consumption also drops from 7.7 L / 100 km to 6.8 L / 100 km for the coupe and from 7.9 L / 100 km to 6.9 L / 100 km for the roadster.