Sentences with phrase «claimed fuel consumption figures»

Previously claiming a fuel consumption figure of 5.9 litres / 100 km, the 318i is now good for 5.1 litres / 100 km.

Coupled with a nine - speed automatic that shuffles drive to all four wheels, the S 63 claims a 0 - 100 km / h time of just 3.5 seconds, a top speed of 250km / h and a claimed fuel consumption figure of 9.3 L / 100 km combined.

The claimed fuel consumption figure is an impressive 25mpg in combined city / highway driving which is identical to the lighter coupe.

Not exact matches

They took particular issue with one excerpt in the book claiming the buses were «reported to be falling short in their fuel consumption and emission figures, in some cases worryingly.»

The anonymous source claims that «While 1,000 bhp is possible, fuel consumption, emissions and engine tolerances will see a more realistic figure of 800bhp targeted.»

Fiat claims a combined fuel consumption figure of 74.3 mpg and CO2 of 90g / km for the 84bhp TwinAir, while the more powerful two - pot manages 67.3 mpg.

It can't match the PHEV on paper, but its claimed fuel consumption of 53.3 mpg is pretty good for an SUV this size, although its 139g / km CO2 emissions figure still means a relatively pricey 29 % Benefit - in - Kind (BiK) rating for company - car drivers.

[18] Perodua claims ECE fuel consumption figures of 21.7 km / l for the manual variant and 21.0 km / l with the automatic, while the auto - only Advance variant is capable of 22.0 km / l, courtesy of the new Eco Idle stop - start system and regenerative braking.

[18] Perodua claims ECE fuel consumption figures of 22.8 km / l for the manual variant and 21.3 km / l with the automatic, both exhibiting a 1.2 km / l improvement over the old 1KR - DE.

The sports activity vehicle is equipped with a 2.0 litre four - cylinder BMW TwinPower Turbo engine, offering 184 hp and 270 Nm for output numbers, and performance figures include a 0 - 100 km / h time of 8.6 seconds and a claimed fuel consumption of 7.5 l per 100 km.

With an all - electric range of up to 31 miles, the E-Hybrid model claims an official fuel consumption figure of 113mpg and slots into the company - car - friendly 13 % Benefit - in - Kind (BiK) band.

The manufacturer claims an ADR combined - cycle fuel consumption figure of 6.3 L / 100 km with CO2 emissions of 165g / km.

So the 1.6 - liter units (both gasoline and diesel) had lost some of their displacement while boasting better fuel consumption and power figures — up to 15 % more efficient, Ford claims.

While AMG has yet to cite weight data for each model, the Coupe claims an NEDC fuel - consumption combined figure of 9.5 litres / 100 km (or 217 grams / km of CO2), while the Cabriolet drinks 9.8 litres / 100 km (223 grams / km).

Astoundingly, the Territory Titanium diesel returned a fuel consumption figure exactly matching the manufacturer's combined claim of 8.2 L / 100 km.

On test, we averaged better than the claimed combined fuel consumption figure of 9.4 L / 100 km with an (admittedly freeway - biased) average of 8.6 L / 100 km.

Icing on the cake here is claimed fuel consumption that's just 4.8 L / 100 km for all models except the 81TSI manual (4.9 L / 100 km), which is not far off the discontinued 1.6 - litre diesel's figures, thanks in part to idle - stop and regenerative braking functions.

The Anniversary 208 GTi is able to accelerate to 100km / h in 6.5 sec (6.8 for the regular 208 GTi) which makes it the fastest of the bunch, yet according to the official figures it's also cleaner and more economical with a combined fuel consumption of 5.4 L / 100 km and a CO2 figure of 125g / km (our test car fell well short of the claimed economy figures at 7.5 L / 100 km).

There's a handful of positives about this car, and a truck full of negatives, including running costs and particularly fuel consumption... Chrysler claims a consumption figure of 13.

Although BMW has yet to reveal any theoretical weight figures of its latest concept car, it claims it goes from 0 to 62 mph in less than 8.0 seconds, has a top speed of around 120 mph and enjoys a combined average fuel consumption of more than 94.1 mpg, boasting an electric range of up to 18.6 miles.

This performance potential is also complemented by good fuel consumption figures too with up to a claimed 35 mpg in highway driving and 26mpg in the city.

It tends to hold onto engine revs for longer than you'd want — which detrimental to fuel consumption and raises concerns as to how easily the Auris» claimed fuel economy figures can be realised.

Fuel consumption figures have also slightly improved to a claimed average of 32mpg with either transmission option.

All up, the CR - Z develops 91kW and 167Nm, with a claimed average fuel consumption figure of 4.7 L / 100 km and average CO2 emissions of 111g / km.

Audi claim the hybrid can achieve an average fuel consumption figure of 6.2 l / 100 km, while emitting CO2 emissions of 142g / km.

The Q60 GT scored an official fuel consumption figure of 7.7 L / 100 km, making it the least economical of the group (BMW for example claims 5.8 L / 100 km for its 420I), and its CO2 emissions are the highest too at 175g / km where the BMW sneaks down to 134g / km.

This is a better fuel consumption figure than Volkswagen claims for the regular 1.4 - litre petrol and compares well to the 188bhp 2.0 - litre diesel.

Of course, we never got close to the GTE's claimed European fuel consumption figure of just 1.5 L / 100 km, which equates to CO2 emissions of just 35g / km, averaging 6.4 L / 100 km over a mostly - freeway return run from Munich to Zurich.