Sentences with phrase «claimed fuel consumption improvements»

As noted previously, tuning work on the CVTs has eked out claimed fuel consumption improvements for both the 2.0 — which drops from 6.9 L / 100 km and 160g / km of CO2 to 6.7 and 156 — and the 2.4, which drops from 7.5 L / 100 km and 174g CO2 per km to 7.2 and 166.

Not exact matches

[18] Perodua claims ECE fuel consumption figures of 22.8 km / l for the manual variant and 21.3 km / l with the automatic, both exhibiting a 1.2 km / l improvement over the old 1KR - DE.

So equipped, Porsche claims combined - cycle fuel consumption of 30.5 mpg for the Boxster and 29.4 mpg for the Boxster S — improvements of about 15 percent over the old model.

BMW claims that it also brings an impressive 12.4 mpg improvement in fuel consumption, at 62.8 mpg, and a 29g / km reduction in CO2 emissions, at 119g / km.

Fuel consumption has dropped from 6.4 to 5.7 L / 100 km in combined - cycle testing, and Audi is claiming a 0 - 100 km / h time of 7.9 seconds — an improvement of 0.4 seconds.

Its claimed combined cycle fuel consumption of 8.3 litres per 100 km represents a 6.7 per cent improvement over the MY12 VE Omega, and puts the new price leader within 0.2 L / 100 km of the four - cylinder Ford Falcon EcoBoost.

Combined fuel consumption for the entry Maxx 2.0 - litre manual rises by 0.5 L / 100 km to 6.9 L / 100 km, while the diesel now consumes 6.0 L / 100 km (up 0.3) and the 2.5 petrol 7.5 L / 100 km (up 0.1), although Mazda is claiming a four per cent improvement in real - world economy.

The adoption of cylinder - on - demand and other fuel - saving features has brought about a claimed 10 % improvement in fuel consumption and CO2 emissions on the European test cycle.

But that's not the only simple improvement that could cut fuel use - now a team from the University of Warwick in the UK claims that «waggling» air accross aircraft wings could cut skin friction drag by 40 %, offering a 20 % savings in fuel consumption and emissions.