Earlier in the day, the FBI notified Congress that Comey misstated key findings involving the Hillary Clinton email investigation during testimony last week, saying that only a «small number» of emails had been forwarded to disgraced congressman Anthony Weiner, not the «hundreds and thousands» he'd
claimed in his testimony.
Libous has denied any wrongdoing after Anthony Mangone, a disbarred attorney,
claimed in testimony that the Binghamton Republican had pushed a politically connected law firm in Westchester County to hire his son.
«The report also found that experts often overstate
their claims in testimony, invoking unscientific terms like «scientific certainty» and claiming 100 percent accuracy.»
Not exact matches
That was one of a number of
claims by the president that called for scrutiny
in the fierce backwash of Comey's accusations
in Senate
testimony that Trump exerted improper pressure on him to back off an FBI investigation.
Jed Shugerman, a Fordham law professor, told Business Insider
in an email that Republicans»
claims in the aftermath of the Comey hearing were «not good - faith arguments» based on the
testimony.
Data collected by the thisisyourdigitallife App was not provided to SCL,» he
claims in the written
testimony.
In seeking testimony from the Dutch bankers, BuzzFeed in an April 13 brief pointed to claims by Gubarev's lawyers that negative publicity that came from the companies» being cited in the dossier led to frozen bank accounts and heightened bank scrutin
In seeking
testimony from the Dutch bankers, BuzzFeed
in an April 13 brief pointed to claims by Gubarev's lawyers that negative publicity that came from the companies» being cited in the dossier led to frozen bank accounts and heightened bank scrutin
in an April 13 brief pointed to
claims by Gubarev's lawyers that negative publicity that came from the companies» being cited
in the dossier led to frozen bank accounts and heightened bank scrutin
in the dossier led to frozen bank accounts and heightened bank scrutiny.
Mr. Collins, the British lawmaker, said he planned to call Alexander Nix, the chief executive of Cambridge Analytica, to return to Parliament and answer questions about
testimony last month
in which he
claimed that the company never obtained or used Facebook data.
This
testimony about Jesus as only a son of David (2 Samuel 7:12 - 14 NIV) who was punished by God with the floggings of men for
claiming to be god thus becoming the «bright morning star» (Isa.14: 9 - 20) was revealed through the Bible by Maestro Evangelista
in http://www.thename.ph which proves he is the «angel» or messenger sent by Jesus to deliver his
testimony or HIS ADMISSION that he is not a son of God and as the «bright morning star «to all churches (or believers of Jesus) thus nullifying the «antichrist» lie made by the apostle John.
Now, here's where I suspect Challies and I may agree: Because we believe Scripture to be authoritative
in matters of faith and practice and a trustworthy
testimony regarding Jesus Christ, we would be right to be highly suspicious of anyone whose
claims about their experiences with God run contrary to the teachings of Scripture.
If one compares the supernatural
claims of the gospels to those of Joseph Smith, the 11 witnesses
claimed to be direct eyewitnesses, their
testimonies were contemporaneously recorded, and there is an external record corroborating they were
in the right place at the right time; the gospels were recorded second hand, well after the alleged events, and there is no extrinsic record corroborating their presence at the right place at the right time.
In view of this conflict between the misunderstanding of the mob and the testimony of the experts, we may justly make one claim: Christianity has a right to be judged in terms of its own noblest exhibitions and not in terms of its perversions and caricature
In view of this conflict between the misunderstanding of the mob and the
testimony of the experts, we may justly make one
claim: Christianity has a right to be judged
in terms of its own noblest exhibitions and not in terms of its perversions and caricature
in terms of its own noblest exhibitions and not
in terms of its perversions and caricature
in terms of its perversions and caricatures.
There is a singularly impressive
testimony to this sense of continuity
in the eleventh chapter of the Epistle to the Hebrews, where the writer
claims not only Moses and the patriarchs, but such splendid savages of a primitive age as Gideon, Samson and Barak, as fellow - members of the «heavenly Jerusalem», (Hebrews xii 22 - 23.)
The substantiation can consist only
in the inherent power of the
claim and the church's experience of it and
testimony to it.
And if they eschewed the economic benefits of reserved places
in government service by refusing to
claim any relationship with their ancestors castes, this was as much a
testimony to their sense of dignity as human beings as it was a witness to their Christian faith.
The next important line of defense consists
in the
claim that the New Testament has preserved records of such historical value that their
testimony to the «bodily resurrection» establishes it beyond all reasonable doubt as an historical event.
In other words, this would include evidence /
testimony of the individual's practices which are consistent with the
claim of a sincerely held belief (e.g. routine church attendance, etc).
The
testimony which constitutes it has as its aim an act which decides
in favor of..., which condemns or acquits, which confers or recognizes a right, which decides between two
claims.
Here we are on much firmer ground than
in the case of the Gospel narratives, for not only is it the earliest written
testimony to the resurrection (written about twenty to twenty - five years after the death of Jesus), but it is first - hand
testimony, and most probably the «only written
testimony to come from one who could
claim to be himself an «eye - witness» of the resurrection».18 Admittedly Paul, on his own admission, was
in a very unusual category.
For the text to be taken as
testimony, as relevatory, judgment must be made about objective characteristics, above all what Ricoeur calls
in Interpretation Theory its «self reference,» its
claims to represent an «I» or a «we» engaged
in a certain past «event of discourse.
This refusal of historical contingency therefore constitutes one of the most dug -
in defenses of the
claim to autonomy and a meditation on the category of
testimony is meant to confront this refusal.
The event of
testimony is set down
in discourse which
claims, by its own self - reference, to be of this character.
With biblical «conservatives» he shares reverence for the sense of the given text, the «last» text.8 He is not concerned to draw inferences from the text to its underlying history, to the circumstances of writing, to the spiritual state of the authors, or even to the existential encounter between Jesus and his followers.9 Indeed, Ricoeur,
in his own way, takes the New Testament for what it
claims to be: «
testimony «10 to the transforming power of the Resurrection.
The
testimony of persons
claiming direct harm from porn has been crucial
in forging new views about pornography.
I can't honestly say that I have experienced anything during my walk as a Christian that would confirm what I
claim to believe — I can offer no
testimony of answered prayer, no victory over sinful tendencies, no boldness
in sharing the bible with others.
Dozens of Romans senators
claimed that the first Roman king, Romulus, was snatched up into heaven right
in front of their eyes... but no Christian believes this eyewitness
testimony.
In 2014
testimony revealed at the same time, one of Sandusky's victims
claimed he reported the coach's abuse to Paterno.
For example, there was a story stating that James Comey would
claim not to have told Donald Trump that Trump wasn't a target of the investigation
in his congressional
testimony.
Unfortunately, the Grand Jury accepted the politically charged
testimony of this legislator and
claimed «Financial Disclosure forms were used by a county official
in a failed attempt to end the legislature's investigation into the ethics commission.»
A Manhattan federal judge ordered The New York Times to produce the author of an editorial for
testimony next week
in former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's lawsuit alleging she was defamed by a false
claim that her political committee incited the gunman who shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords
in 2011.
He says
testimonies he expects to be made public
in the coming days were from «whistleblowers» who were «peripheral, making invented
claims about things they didn't see».
That was consistent with a
claim made
in an email to the CWA PAC attorney, James Reif, of Gladstein Reif and Meginniss,
in which, Reif wrote to Adler, «you stated that the Richmond County Grand Jury will begin taking
testimony on September 5, 2014.»
At a Council hearing last week, REBNY submitted
testimony opposing the bill and
claimed that it is unneeded
in the face of a «thriving» hotel and tourism industry.
And on Tuesday, the
testimony of former Christie ally David Wildstein —
in which he
claimed the governors discussed a never issued report to act as a cover story for the closures — confirmed his suspicions.
The
claim was first made
in an unrelated federal corruption trial of a Yonkers city councilwoman during the
testimony of disbarred lawyer Anthony Mangone (the
testimony can be found here).
It follows
testimony from co-founder Jeff Silvester to Canadian MPs
in which he
claimed to be co-operating with the watchdog's inquiry into Cambridge Analytica.
Cuomo lashed out after de Blasio, during
testimony in Albany last week,
claimed the governor and the Legislature weren't pulling their weight
in funding city schools to abide with a court ruling.
Singh's Monday
testimony in Central Islip federal court followed his blockbuster
claim last week that de Blasio twice encouraged him to make «straw» donations to US Rep. Yvette Clarke (D - Brooklyn) and unspecified candidates for the state Senate.
Former lobbyist Todd Howe ended his
testimony on Thursday,
claiming that Cuomo yelled at him after a deal to build a new basketball arena
in downtown Syracuse fell apart.
According to
testimony at a recent Federal corruption trial
in which Jay Savino was a testifying witness, Savino
claimed he was employed «cleaning bathrooms and filling icetrays» at a restaurant
in Rockland County.
The Harvard Kennedy School grad
claimed he he found evidence that Bratton had low - balled the numbers
in testimony before City Council, but that City Hall turned a deaf ear to his complaints.
In his
testimony to the CBI, he
claimed that he received extortion threats from men working for Chota Shakeel, a Mumbai mobster.
While most examiners no longer
claim the «100 % accuracy» of a fingerprint analysis, the moderating terms now used
in court
testimony and reports continue to state that examiners can «identify» or are «practically certain of» the source of a latent print, says the report.
The statement was provided
in support of
testimony presented to US House of Representatives Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on Immigration and
Claims Hearing on Uranium Workers Health Effects and Radiation Exposure Compensation Act Amendments on June 25, 1998
in Washington DC.
Jurors weren't allowed to hear
testimony that Bill Cosby's chief accuser was once hooked on hallucinogenic mushrooms or had her sights set on becoming a millionaire, but that hasn't stopped the defense from airing the explosive
claims about Andrea Constand
in the court of public opinion.
He presents the
testimonies of patients, scientists, surgeons and nutritionists who testify to the therapy's efficacy
in curing cancer and other degenerative diseases, and presents the hard scientific proof to back up their
claims.
An avalanche of allegations poured out Tuesday against Harvey Weinstein
in on - the - record reports that detailed
claims of sexual abuse and included
testimonies from Gwyneth Paltrow and Angelina Jolie, further intensifying the already explosive collapse...
The trial of Jodi Arias — who
claims self - defense
in the killing of her ex-boyfriend Travis Alexander — reaches week 10, and HLN continues its coverage featuring expert analysis of the
testimony.
The goal of this letter, though, was to give those
in Santa Fe, but also others throughout the state of New Mexico, not only a more comprehensive and accurate assessment of my
testimony, but more a note about how the taxpayers of New Mexico have a right to know much, much more about their state's teacher evaluation model, as well as the model's output (i.e., to see how the model is actually functioning as
claimed).
He told the court he could decide within three months whether a new teacher would meet program standards —
testimony the defense used
in support of its
claim there is sufficient time to make decision on tenure within the two - year statutory framework.