Sentences with phrase «claimed invention»

If you do not do this, can the company claim the invention or innovation as their own?

Ooty is an old British hill station at over 2,000 metres (once known as «snooty Ooty» and which claims the invention of snooker), the terminus of the Nilgiri railway.

It doesn't commit you to a formal patent application, and doesn't result in a patent, but it does allow you to claim your invention so that you can do a full patent application later.

TELEGRAPH CLAIMS — «It is well known that the English claim the invention of the magnetic telegraph for their countryman, Prof. Wheatstone.

Filipinos claim its invention: they call it «barong tagalog» (literally, «shirt of the Filipino»), and would have us believe it was carried to Mexico by the legendary Manila Galleons.

The Aerogenerator team claims its invention gets round these problems.

The Supreme Court has signaled heightened disclosure obligations for individually claimed inventions at the bottom of the cascade.

Although not obligated to do so, the patentee can contractually agree to permit another to practice the claimed invention, via a licensing agreement.

A patent allows an inventor to exclude others from making, using or selling the claimed invention for a limited period of time, now 20 years from the filing of the patent application.

Despite being second to submit, Zhang was awarded the patent based on his claimed invention date.

In its rejection letter, the PTO says that Newman's claimed invention — which relies on the use of human embryos — «includes within its scope a human being, and as such falls outside the scope» of what the PTO regards as legally patentable.

It is then the job of patent examiners — another patent - related job performed by trained scientists — to decide whether the claimed invention is sufficiently novel and inventive to be granted a patent.

Patents are an exclusionary right; the owner has the right to exclude others from practicing the claimed invention (see Section 42 of the Patent Act) as an incentive for innovation and new technology.

Apple also argued that even if that document had not anticipated Samsung's claimed invention, it would render the patent obvious if combined with a Nortel change request submitted as part of the standard - setting process.

(Should Apple prevail on slide - to - unlock to any extent, this would contrast with the fact that all ten European judges who looked at the European member of the same patent family did not deem the claimed invention patentworthy.

Instead, lawyers focus on technical advantages associated with features that differ between the claimed invention and the artificial «closest prior art.»

Struggles with EPO patent eligibility often come from having to explain that features of a claimed invention are technically advantageous, or «have a technical effect», when the description provides little explanation of the invention or its advantages.

For a patent to be valid in Canada, the invention claimed must be new and inventive; if the claimed invention is not inventive, it is deemed to be «obvious» and, therefore, not patentable.

The PTAB did not err in denying the patent owner's motion to amend claims because the proposed claims would have impermissibly broadened the claimed invention.

According to EPO case law, in order to validly establish priority for subject matter in a first filing, the subject matter must be sufficiently disclosed, this usually means with enough data for the claimed invention to be plausible.

The claimed invention was made by or on behalf of parties to a joint research agreement that was in effect on or before the date the claimed invention was made;

the claimed invention was made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of the joint research agreement; and

In both the United States and Europe there have also been concerns as to whether the claimed invention was obvious.

Anticipation also occurs when the claimed invention inherently (necessarily) results from practice of what is disclosed in the written reference, even if the inherent disclosure was unrecognized or unappreciated by one of ordinary skill in the field of the invention.

In reaching your conclusion about whether or not claims -LSB--RSB- would have been obvious at the time the claimed invention was made, you should consider any difference or differences between the [identify prior art reference (s)-RSB- and the claimed requirements.

A person accused of infringement has the right to argue here in federal court that a claimed invention in the patent is not entitled to patent protection because it does not meet the requirements for a patent.

[The alleged infringer] must prove that it is highly probable that a claimed invention was obvious.

A person using the claimed invention within the specified period shall pay the patent holder a refund (once the patent owner receives a patent).

Although you should consider any evidence of these factors, the relevance and importance of any of them to your decision on whether the claimed invention would have been obvious is up to you.

Patent examiners — Personnel employed by the PTO who review (examine) patent applications, each in a specific technical area, to determine whether the claims of a patent application are patentable and whether the specification adequately describes and enables the claimed invention.