Sentences with phrase «claimed misfeasance in public office»

The two former partners, who have both since left the profession, have also claimed misfeasance in public office, abuse of process and libel.

Not exact matches

They also claim common law causes of action, including for the torts of misfeasance in public office, deceit, assault (trespass to the person) and negligence.

In allowing the appeal only on the claim of misfeasance in public office, the court said: «It follows that Trillium should be entitled to proceed based on the allegations that the Government's actions were specifically meant to injure the appellanIn allowing the appeal only on the claim of misfeasance in public office, the court said: «It follows that Trillium should be entitled to proceed based on the allegations that the Government's actions were specifically meant to injure the appellanin public office, the court said: «It follows that Trillium should be entitled to proceed based on the allegations that the Government's actions were specifically meant to injure the appellant.

They claim to have been subjected to false imprisonment, trespass to the person, conspiracy to injure, torture, breach of contract, negligence, misfeasance in public office and breaches of their rights under the Human Rights Act 1998.

The claims in Belhaj were framed as claims for false imprisonment, trespass to the person, conspiracy to injure or to use unlawful means, misfeasance in public office and negligence.

Examples of such cases are Chandler v Cape Plc [2011] EWHC 951 (QB)(liability of non-employer for exposure to asbestos), Kynixa Ltd v Hynes and others [2008] EWHC 1495 (QB)(claims arising from alleged breaches of restrictive covenants in employment contracts), Romantiek BVBA v Simms [2008] EWHC 3099 (QB) a claim alleging that a public official had committed the tort of misfeasance in public office when discharging a licensing function, OOO and others v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [20011] EWHC 1246 (QB)(claims by young foreign females that they had been trafficked into the UK by foreign nationals for the purpose of slavery and that officers of the Metropolitan Police Force breached their human rights in failing to investigate their complaints adequately or at all) and Mouncher and others v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2016] EWHC 1367 (QB)(claims by retired and serving police officers for false imprisonment, misfeasance in public office and malicious prosecution against South Wales Police arising from an investigation by officers of that force into alleged criminal conduct on the part of the claimants during the course of an investigation into a notorious murder in South Wales.

KLA v Chief Constable of Surrey and News Group Newspapers: for claimant in privacy, misfeasance in public office and HRA claims against police and privacy and harassment claims against the newspaper concerning sale of the victim of crime's private information to the Sun newspaper.