A claimed source of fibre / protein / antioxidants doesn't necessarily mean the cereal contains large amounts of these nutrients.
Not exact matches
More
claims to fame include great
sources of both omega 3s and protein and virtually all the carbohydrates in chia seeds are
fibre (which doesn't require insulin to process).
The qualifying criteria for
claiming a product is a «
source»
of dietary
fibre is just 2g per serving, for example, and depending on the serving size this may not amount to much at all.
The problem is that
claims such as «no artificial colours or flavours», «contains wholegrain», «added vitamin and minerals», «
source of fibre» and «99 % fat free» are masking a cereal that's
fibre - flimsy, contains too much salt, too much sugar or all
of the above.
Exhibiting prebiotic properties and a low glycaemic response, enables possible nutrition
claims including «
source of fibre» or «high in
fibre»