Sentences with phrase «claimed such schemes»

The IEA claimed such schemes would have to be piloted by local authorities and that if determined by Whitehall the proposed system would be «a mess».

The CBI has rejected calls for a flat rate citizens» pension for all, claiming such a scheme would be prohibitively expensive.

Not exact matches

«Yelp has never done this and individuals making such claims are either misinformed, or more typically, have an axe to grind — whether businesses upset that Yelp will not remove reviews they don't like, or unscrupulous internet marketing «experts» trying to make a buck off of honest business owners with dubious reputation management schemes.»

The Executive Summary of that August 2012 report claims that the duopoly, through tactics such as «price discrimination, shopper docket schemes, store saturation and over-sized store strategies [building huge supermarkets in small local markets in order to drive out existing competition and prevent new market entrants]», is «crowding out all competition [and] rapidly reducing the choices in shopping format, brands, locally - derived products and service levels».

The dubious advisers included Luigi DiFonzo — a former felon who claimed he was anItalian count and defrauded players such as Hall of Fame running back Eric Dickerson before committing suicide in August 2000 — and disgraced agent William (Tank) Black, who built a pyramid scheme that took a total of about $ 15 million from at least a dozen players, including Patriots running backFred Taylor.

City Housing Authority officials engaged in a «nefarious scheme» to exempt apartments from requirements that they be annually inspected for lead paint — even though they can't confirm those units qualified for such a waiver, an amended lawsuit claims.

The news comes despite repeated drives to improve efficiency, such as a «payment by results» scheme of tariffs which, the NAO claimed, produced some positive results in the speed of patient turnover in hospitals.

Earlier, a report in the London Evening Standard, edited by the former chancellor George Osborne, claimed David Cameron had tried to introduce such a scheme, but the 1922 committee of backbench Conservative MPs blocked it.

Should such a terrorist onslaught occur, plans are in place to evacuate nearby residents, although it must be said that critics claim these schemes to be impractical.

There are several schemes which aim to raise the attainment of pupils from the poorest families, such as the pupil deprivation grant, but the report claimed the system was too complex.

If you receive notice that you are being taken to court (such as a summons, statement of claim or liquidated claim) you should check if your dispute can be referred to an external dispute resolution scheme.

You also agree that any such claims may be re-assigned to another body, if that other body has paid sums you have claimed under the ATOL scheme.

However you then say «Unfortunately such a scheme will only be satisfactory if those claiming to have had posts deleted are honest and of course we have no way of making a final determination on that question.»

Haapala also pointed out how unscientific such scheming was — especially when perpetrated by those claiming that the «science is settled» and that humanity must promptly submit to a draconian UN «global warming» regime.

The IATA does say that it could support carefully designed carbon trading policies, though it prefers voluntary agreements to regulation, and it claims that such schemes should be restricted to carbon dioxide only, and that other emissions should be tackled by «other means» (no mention is made of what these means might be).

But issues you might describe as «fault» can be relevant to things like when the limitation period starts to run for trustees» claims against members, such as in the Webber case, where it was important to establish when the scheme could, with reasonable diligence, have discovered the mistake.

Alternative complaints bodies (such as Ombudsman Services, ProMediate and Small Claims Mediation) exist which are competent to deal with complaints about legal services should both you and our firm wish to use such a scheme.

No HA 2004, s 21 notice requiring possession under an assured shorthold tenancy may be given during tenancy scheme non-compliance and the current accelerated possession assured shorthold claim form (the N5B) states: «If your claim for possession is in relation to an assured shorthold tenancy where a deposit was taken after 6 April 2007, you must provide evidence that such deposit is safeguarded with a tenancy deposit scheme... authorised under Pt 6 of the Housing Act 2004.»

The public trust doctrine has not been widely discussed in Canadian case law with the only significant mention being by the Supreme Court of Canada in British Columbia v. Canadian Forest Products Ltd., 2004 SCC 38 at para. 74 where Binnie J. acknowledged that «The notion that there are public rights in the environment that reside in the Crown has deep roots in the common law» (however, the majority decision ultimately took a conservative approach to not allow the Crown to succeed in a general claim for damages for «environmental loss» [caused by a negligently undetected controlled burn of slashing and other waste by a logging company] in the absence of a statutory scheme permitting such a claim).

The question was therefore whether, in relation to the charity shell scheme, the claimants took the benefit of an extended limitation period under s 14A of LA 1980, on the grounds that they did not acquire both the knowledge required for bringing an action and a right to bring such an action any time before three years before the claim was issued.

Apart from a scheme with clear parameters, such as the new system for road traffic claims, there is a real risk that fixing costs gives an unfair advantage to the well - resourced defendant.

Lord Justice Wall gave another reasoned judgment, to the same effect, adding that the very nature of the pay schemes under attack in the Suffolk case (Agenda for Change) was such that it incorporated detailed procedures for complaints by individuals, meaning that the respondent was not likely to be wrong - footed by a grievance in general terms; on that basis, it was doubly important that such claims should not be defeated on technical grounds.

In traditional industrial relations thinking, such a scheme may be a natural way of easing in change (after all, «red circling» was one of the earliest defences to an equal pay claim thirty years ago) but there is now the distinct possibility that the scheme itself could be discriminatory and illegal.

She would not have been able to mount such a claim had not RRA 1976 been amended to include s 19B, as the administration of the compensation scheme would not have been caught under any of the other provisions of RRA 1976.

These schemes are gaining popularity — about 80 per cent of claims are from such policies, say industry players.

In two cases this quarter, two different federal courts in Pennsylvania reached different conclusions regarding RESPA claims involving such schemes.

79 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Pagano - disclosure of agency relationships; failure to appear at hearing; proper business practices; unauthorized practice of law; unearned commissions; vicarious liability; fraudulent practice; jurisdiction; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof of proper service; DOS has jurisdiction after expiration of respondents» licenses as acts of misconduct occurred and the proceedings were commenced while the respondents were licensed; licensee fails to timely provide seller client with agency disclosure form prior to entering into listing agreement and fails to timely provide agency disclosure form to buyer upon first substantive contact; broker fails to make it clear for which party he is acting; broker violates 19 NYCRR 175.24 by using exclusive right to sell listing agreement without mandatory definitions of «exclusive right to sell» and «exclusive agency»; broker breaches fiduciary duties to seller clients by misleading them as to buyer's ability to financially consummate the transaction; broker breaches his fiduciary duty to seller by referring seller to the attorney who represented the buyers when he knew or should have known such attorney could not properly protect seller's interests; improper for broker to use listing agreements providing for broker to retain one half of any deposit if forfeited by buyer as such forfeiture clause could, by its terms, allow broker to retain part of the deposit when broker did not earn a commission; broker must conduct business under name as it appears on license; broker engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in preparing contracts for purchase and sale of real estate which did not contain a clause making it subject to the approval of the parties» attorneys and were not a form recommended by a joint bar / real estate board committee; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using sales contract which purported to change the terms of the listing agreement to include a higher commission; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using contracts of sale which were unclear, ambiguous, vague and incomplete; broker failed to amend purchase agreement to reflect amendment to increase deposit amount; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in back - dating purchase agreements; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in participating in scheme to have seller hold undisclosed second mortgage and to mislead first mortgagee about the purchaser's financial ability to purchase; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness by claiming unearned commission and filing affidavit of entitlement for unearned commission; DOS fails to establish by substantial evidence that respondent acted as undisclosed dual agent; corporate broker bound by the knowledge acquired by and is responsible for acts committed by its licensees within the actual or apparent scope of their authority; corporate and individual brokers» licenses revoked, no action taken on application for renewal until proof of payment of sum of $ 2,000.00 plus interests for deposits unlawfully retained