It's
claimed the company then used these profiles for targeted advertising.
It's
claimed the company then used these profiles for targeted advertising.
Not exact matches
In a statement, Uber told news site Axios: «This settlement involves
claims dating back to July 2013 and, while we are continually improving as a
company, we have proactively made a lot of changes since
then.
We shortlisted
companies based on revenue figures supplied on a brief self - nominating ballot,
then verified revenue
claims and eligibility through detailed questionnaires and reviews of applicant - supplied financial statements.
But
then, the secretive
company's
claims it could run a full range of tests from a few drops a blood had yet to be vetted by anyone.
An opportunistic law firm
then piggybacked on the newspaper's reporting, announcing Tuesday that it was investigating whether the
company made
claims to investors that violate securities laws.
Then the
company's HR chief quit abruptly — because, Donovan
claims, she felt it was time to cease operations and let employees go at that point, while Donovan and her cofounders wanted to try to secure more funding over the weekend.
«It could cost a
company more to qualify a product and do all the paperwork to
claim NAFTA
then the one or two per cent they pay in [WTO] duties.
We'd wake up, walk 20 feet down the hall, sit down at the table, not move except to eat,
then go to bed,» Ho tells Fast
Company,
claiming the unusual arrangements helped the team be more innovative and productive, save money and instill a horizontal, hierarchy - free culture.
After reports surfaced that Cambridge Analytica still had that data, the
company claimed it deleted it while suspending
then - CEO Nix.
To test the
company's waterproof
claim, we placed tissue paper inside the zip - pouch, put the zip - pouch inside the Kona Pouch, and
then submerged the whole thing in eight inches of water for five minutes.
Then the
company can walk away with a defacto license to perpetually harvest that person's data by
claiming that a consent box was once ticked.
The
company also
claims that in the near future, verified trader will be available to the hedge funds, major banks and corporations and from
then, the license will start costing $ 10,000.
Agents who agree would
then accept the tokens as payment in exchange for reducing their traditional commissions in U.S. dollars to as low as 1 percent, or an average of $ 225 per token used, the
company claims.
«This settlement involves
claims dating back to July 2013 and, while we are continually improving as a
company, we have proactively made a lot of changes since
then,» the spokesperson said in a statement.
Finally, GM's quick repayment of the loans has whetted the appetite of some commentators (including DeCloet) for the ultimate repayment of the full government contribution. That would occur through the issuance of public equity by GM and Chrysler, creating a market for those stocks into which the government would presumably sell its shares. There is even some nefarious language in the rescue packages requiring the government to sell off its shares within specified, relatively aggressive timelines. The more I think about it, the less this makes sense — neither for the auto industry, nor for taxpayers. Why not hang onto the equity stake? If the
companies recover and the equity gains market value,
then the government will be able to
claim that on its balance sheet (hence officially recouping the cost of its written - off contributions and creating a budgetary gain).
My friends who buy from an insurance
company are constantly battling to have their
claims paid...
Then there are the people who get dropped when they start costing the insurance
companies too much.
We who proclaim Christ ought to have enough faith that our Lord is what we
claim him to be, to permit such men and women to have, if not full
then some limited, participation in Christian life in the community of faith; for we are confident, or we should be confident if we really believe what we say about Jesus, that such fellowship with him in the
company of his people will lead them more and more deeply into the true significance of his person.
Wouldn't you say that a
company that
claims to be Christian, takes your money and
then turns around and gives it to an organization who has openly stated they would prefer the government would take certain citizens of this country out and SHOOT them is Christian?
I am going to weigh in, being a catholic and the whole shabang... First of all this is not infringing on anyone's right to practice their religion... Requiring insurance
companies to provide contraception for women does not mean the woman has to use it or purchase it... Catholic hospitals take federal funds for their patients, therefore they are not exempt from employment laws... If the Catholic Diocese doesn't want to provide the insurance
claiming religious beliefs,
then they can no longer accept federal funded patients... They also know that they will be subjected to discrimination lawsuits based hiring and religious discrimination — non-catholics work there, and therefore are being denied healthcare due to catholic beliefs... Majority if not all Catholic women do, have, or had used contraception in their lifetime... God does not nor does the bible say anything about contraception, since it had not been invented yet — so this is a man - made law, made by a bunch of men, who have never had a menstrual cycle — and the pain that comes with it....
Once you're on your
company profile page, click the «Unclaimed» link and
then click the «
claim» link to submit your
claim request.
Peter Laufer: Yes, except in the environment that we have and the type capitalism we practice the regulatory agency in question which is the USDA, the United States Department of Agriculture; the National Organic Program, the NOP, is serving business at least as much as it's servicing the rest of us and maybe more and it's the position of the USDA that if
companies like Trader Joe's or others decide that the origin of their products is a proprietary business tool,
then they are successfully able to hide behind that
claim and not tell you where something you're going to buy and eat came from.
For one it's stupid costly to rent car seats, in my experience rental places want upwards of $ 15 / day or more to rent a single car seat (I have been quoted $ 25 a day) after a few days you can exceed the cost of simply purchasing new... Meaning you could have purchased a brand new in the box car seat and checked that at the luggage counter complete with all it's factory packing that should allow it to arrive undamaged and you now have a backup or travel car seat complete with packaging... Second you have no idea about the condition of that rented car seat, as you imply, unseen damage is well unseen regardless of
claims of «inspection» by the rental
company, there is no way they can't tell if it's damaged if the damage is unseen, they are only doing visual checks nothing more... In the end there is nothing to assure you that your «rented» car seat will be in any better condition
then one you brought with you or that it wasn't in an unreported «accident» from the previous renters or mishandled by the previous renters... If safety is you end goal, renting a car seat at your destination is not inline with that goal...
Because we do not file
claims with insurance
companies, we will require payment up front and
then the invoice with prescription will be provided for reimbursement.
And so if they are advertising them directly to consumers, if they are putting out information that is inappropriate about them that makes extra
claims that would be not compliant in other ways,
then the
company is not compliant.
Then earlier this year, McDonald's CEO Don Thompson lied over and over at the
company's shareholder meeting,
claiming for example, that the
company doesn't market to children, and provides «high - quality food.»
As a courtesy, if you have a PPO insurance plan, we will send a
claim to your insurance
company who will
then reimburse you directly according to your plan's out - of - network benefits.
This achievement has emboldened Trump to
claim that other American
companies that move jobs overseas and
then export back to the U.S. will face 35 per cent tariffs, but pushing through such measures will be dangerous, if not difficult.
Watts
then pointed to embroiled data firm Cambridge Analytica CEO Alexander Nix, whose CEO
claimed in hidden camera footage that the
company could use Ukrainian sex workers to entrap politicians.
Howe
claims to have helped execs at two
companies doing business with the state funnel more than $ 300,000 in bribes to
then - Cuomo aide Joseph Percoco.
Those credits can
then be used to
claim a free space later on, the
company said.
She
then claimed that people «get appalling service if they are ever unlucky enough to have to contact the
company».
Well, when DioGuardi's opponents were: 1) David Malpass, whose chief
claim to fame was as an economist for a
company that crashed and burned in the financial crisis, and 2) Bruce Blakeman (enough said),
then it's not like Mr. Long had much of a choice.
He
claimed that every now and
then domestic servants at the Presidential Villa were sent to deposit money into the
company's accounts for Patience.
In other words, on the principle of «follow the money», if Banks
claims that the cash went from him, to his
company Better for the Country Limited, to a supplier (or suppliers), and
then, in the form of campaign merchandise, to the various pro-Brexit groups, who were the suppliers?
Then, in June, Gabelli and his many
companies shelled out a reported $ 130 million or more to settle another lingering lawsuit, this one filed by the FCC, which
claimed he deceived the government by using sham
companies to win lucrative cell - phone licenses earmarked small and minority - owned businesses.
That left room Thursday for Sen. Len Fasano, the Republican Senate leader, to say, wait a minute, if the tax changes weren't bad for GE and the
company is bluffing, as Democrats
claimed in June, «
then why would Gov. Malloy offer them a lot of state taxpayer money in hopes they will stay?»
Among other things, Future Tech set up shell
companies and
then vastly inflated its
claims of how much those
companies charged.
I'd
then point out that surgeons all agree that the small intestines and colon clean themselves, and that fecal matter doesn't «stick to the side of the intestinal wall» as is usually
claimed by these juice fasting and other detox
companies.
Some
companies are trying to sell diosgenin, which they label «wild yam extract» as a medicine or supplement,
claiming that the body will
then convert it into hormones as needed.
Companies will only list some of their ingredients and
then make
claims that make the entire product seem healthy.
However, just as Lister created its recent 666bhp Thunder from Jaguar's F - type R, it's likely that for its SUV the
company will start with a Jaguar F - Pace SVR,
then uprate the running gear to extract the performance necessary to deliver on its bold
claim.
Despite the size increase, Audi
claims that the new car has maintained its weight (although the
company is not yet publishing final figures for the U.S. - spec model); if so,
then the A8, tipping the scales at some 4400 pounds, will keep its position as the trimmest entry in the all - wheel - drive, ultra-luxe sedan class.
If this isn't possible or preferable
then there are
companies who offer specific trackday cover and should you
claim on them it will not affect your regular no
claims discount.
Until
then, to further add fuel to the raging rumor fire, Google senior VP of engineering Vic Gundotra has posted some cool images that the
company claims have been taken with a Nexus 10 device.
Then again, this is not very uncommon, and most online writing
companies claim to provide an outstanding experience.
All you need to do is file a
claim and replace your property, and
then let the insurance
companies sort it out between each other.
I am dealing with a
company called The Student Loan Help Center that is
claiming to be helping me get out of default, consolidate all my loans,
then start loan forgiveness based on my income.
Somebody I met
claims that some «shady» business owners out there can create a
company with the purpose of paying for an expensive service -
then make that
company file for bankruptcy to avoid paying for said service (after the service was already completed).
You'd probably make a
claim on your policy, and
then your insurance
company would go after the person who caused the loss.