Sentences with phrase «claimed the court case on»

While district reform collapsed, and claimed the court case on the never - implemented voucher program as collateral, charter parents will ensure that school choice carries on in this Colorado suburban county.

Not exact matches

In 1990, the Supreme Court of Canada had created a sophisticated legal test on workplace anti — discrimination claims, but, as the Court acknowledged in Tawney Meiorin's case, this test had proven to be complicated and challenging to use.

In Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 98 the Supreme Court formalized this premise into a doctrinal test.The case involved cigarette manufacturing, an industry dominated by six firms.99 Liggett, one of the six, introduced a line of generic cigarettes, which it sold for about 30 % less than the price of branded cigarettes.100 Liggett alleged that when it became clear that its generics were diverting business from branded cigarettes, Brown & Williamson, a competing manufacturer, began selling its own generics at a loss.101 Liggett sued, claiming that Brown & Williamson's tactic was designed to pressure Liggett to raise prices on its generics, thus enabling Brown & Williamson to maintain high profits on branded cigarettes.

And given that Mr. Hogan has had financial ups and downs, the cost of the hundreds of motions his lawyers made is significant, and the chances the award is significantly reduced based on previous cases he lost making the same claims in federal court, it's hard to completely understand the motivations at play.

Close students of the Supreme Court will tell you that they could see this coming: Compassion in Dying is only the first of many cases based on claims of autonomous individualism that the Court invited with its loose and grandiose Casey language.

Following the review's publication, Bishop Peter Hancock, the Church of England's lead safeguarding bishop, said: «At the heart of this case was a judgment, on the balance of probabilities, as to whether, in the event that her claim for compensation reached trial, a court would have concluded that Carol was abused by Bishop Bell.

In those cases the court deferred to the judgment of the Air Force that the free - exercise claim of a Jewish officer who wore his yarmulke on duty could not be accommodated; it deferred to the judgment of correctional authorities that the free - exercise claim of a Black Muslim to attend Friday afternoon religious services could not be accommodated; it deferred to the judgment of the Department of Agriculture's Forest Service that building a logging road through a national forest was necessary despite the damage to religious practices of Native American tribes in that area; it deferred to the Internal Revenue Service's ruling that Bob Jones University was not entitled to tax exemption because of its religiously motivated rule against interracial dating and marriage on campus; it deferred to the judgment of the secretary of labor that a religious community must pay its members the minimum wage for work they performed in the group's business although the members said they had religious objections to being paid for their work.

Rules of court are dictated by what is expedient on the whole and in the long run; but they run the risk of being unjust to the claims of particular cases.

In a December 3, 2017 order dismissing the case that is likely to be viewed with some relief by many dairy companies, US district judge Katherine B Forrest agreed with Dannon, noting that a court handling a similar false advertising lawsuit about «non-GMO» claims on dairy products fed GM feed (Gallagher v. Chipotle Mexican Grill) rejected a similar claim at the pleading stage.

The claims and cross claims will make for a riveting court case and no doubt pique investor's interests as the success of a2 — and the surge in its share price from 55 cents to almost $ 2 in the past year — rests largely on its health claims, which will be scrutinised in open court.

The court emphasized that liability claims for vaccine harm must be considered on a case - by - case basis.

In papers submitted by the UK Government last year in the case and seen by the BHA, the Government attempted to argue that there is no breach of EU law because «if a teacher brought a claim against a school (on the basis that the school, as an employer, had discriminated against them in their remuneration, for example), then the court or tribunal would consider the legislation in this wider context.

Polling showing 81 % of public support assisted dying: http://humanism.org.uk/2012/09/07/news-1108/ Previous BHA news article — «L' waives right to anonymity in assisted dying court case: http://humanism.org.uk/2013/04/18/paul-lamb-l-waives-right-to-anonymity-in-assisted-dying-court-case/ Previous BHA news article — Court of Appeal allows «L' to join Tony Nicklinson Claim: http://humanism.org.uk/2013/03/20/court-of-appeal-allows-l-to-join-tony-nicklinson-claim/ Previous BHA news article — New case to test rules on assisted dying in UK: http://humanism.org.uk/2011/08/19/news-873/ The BHA's campaign on Assisted Dying: http://humanism.org.uk/campaigns/public-ethical-issues/assisted-dcourt case: http://humanism.org.uk/2013/04/18/paul-lamb-l-waives-right-to-anonymity-in-assisted-dying-court-case/ Previous BHA news article — Court of Appeal allows «L' to join Tony Nicklinson Claim: http://humanism.org.uk/2013/03/20/court-of-appeal-allows-l-to-join-tony-nicklinson-claim/ Previous BHA news article — New case to test rules on assisted dying in UK: http://humanism.org.uk/2011/08/19/news-873/ The BHA's campaign on Assisted Dying: http://humanism.org.uk/campaigns/public-ethical-issues/assisted-dcourt-case/ Previous BHA news article — Court of Appeal allows «L' to join Tony Nicklinson Claim: http://humanism.org.uk/2013/03/20/court-of-appeal-allows-l-to-join-tony-nicklinson-claim/ Previous BHA news article — New case to test rules on assisted dying in UK: http://humanism.org.uk/2011/08/19/news-873/ The BHA's campaign on Assisted Dying: http://humanism.org.uk/campaigns/public-ethical-issues/assisted-dCourt of Appeal allows «L' to join Tony Nicklinson Claim: http://humanism.org.uk/2013/03/20/court-of-appeal-allows-l-to-join-tony-nicklinson-claim/ Previous BHA news article — New case to test rules on assisted dying in UK: http://humanism.org.uk/2011/08/19/news-873/ The BHA's campaign on Assisted Dying: http://humanism.org.uk/campaigns/public-ethical-issues/assisted-dcourt-of-appeal-allows-l-to-join-tony-nicklinson-claim/ Previous BHA news article — New case to test rules on assisted dying in UK: http://humanism.org.uk/2011/08/19/news-873/ The BHA's campaign on Assisted Dying: http://humanism.org.uk/campaigns/public-ethical-issues/assisted-dying/

NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio explained why he has refused to comment on the blockbuster appeals court ruling in favor of ex-Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, claiming he hasn't «paid attention» to the state's biggest political corruption case in decades.

The Dispatch Editor said he never bothered to follow up on the case until last year when the informant denied claims by the police at the court that their investigations unearth the evil plot to end the life of mogul.

This intriguing revelation by the ICC didn't come as a surprise to some of us who have been following this case since 2010 and have always been of the view that the Supreme Court of Ghana erred in linking Mr.Woyome's claims for works done for the state in 2005 to a waterville contract in 2006 on which basis it asked Mr.Woyome to refund all his entitlement paid him.

On January 30, a small claims court in Los Angeles County heard arguments in the case called Patel v Associated Students.

We find it very bizarre that the Hon. Attorney - General, Ms Gloria Akufo, who assured the entire citizenry of her commitment to fairness and strict adherence to ethical principles at her vetting not too long ago, will claim that she exercised the said constitutional discretion on grounds merely that there was a lack of evidence to prosecute the case in question when indeed, the Siting Judge, Court Clerks, Court Bailiffs, Court Warrant Officers (CWOs), Journalists as well as notable public figures in whose presence the said court was physically attacked and the accused persons freed, are alive and available to be interviewed and evidence taken from Court Clerks, Court Bailiffs, Court Warrant Officers (CWOs), Journalists as well as notable public figures in whose presence the said court was physically attacked and the accused persons freed, are alive and available to be interviewed and evidence taken from Court Bailiffs, Court Warrant Officers (CWOs), Journalists as well as notable public figures in whose presence the said court was physically attacked and the accused persons freed, are alive and available to be interviewed and evidence taken from Court Warrant Officers (CWOs), Journalists as well as notable public figures in whose presence the said court was physically attacked and the accused persons freed, are alive and available to be interviewed and evidence taken from court was physically attacked and the accused persons freed, are alive and available to be interviewed and evidence taken from same.

In arriving at the decision, Justice Saidu relied on the recent Court of Appeal decision in the case of LASWA & Ors vs. NIWA & Ors, adding that the Plaintiffs failed to establish the identity of the land claimed.

Indeed, prosecutors in the Silver case told the judge in a court filing last month that if the assemblyman's lawyers introduced evidence to «shed light on his good character or his character for truthfulness,» they would want to tell the jury about a 2009 episode that they claimed raised questions about his honesty.

Any day now the Supreme Court will rule on a case which claims that the policy discriminates against the disabled.

(c) And also for * submissions based on the assertion that Mr. Woyome had no contract with the Government of Ghana * and therefore had no valid claims against the Government be determined by the High Court, and not by this Court (the Supreme Court), since they do not involve, according to the relevant case law, the interpretation and enforcement of the Constitution and do not therefore fall within the ambit of the Court's original jurisdiction under Article 130 (1) of the 1992 Constitution.

Mr Woyome who claims his human rights has been abused and was occasioned by the Review Decision of the Supreme Court of Ghana has sent this aspect of the case to the African Court on Human and Peoples» Right in Arusha Tanzania by invoking article 40 read together with article 75 of the 1992 constitution of The Republic of Ghana under case number Ref: AfCHPR / Reg.

She admitted one court case had been dropped as a result of «poor paperwork» but rejected media claims this was taking place on a more widespread basis.

«The Ministry of Justice is consulting on proposals that would increase the number of disputed compensation cases heard by small claims courts — where claimants have to pay their own legal fees even if they win.

Court documents also show that Sampson in an interview with federal agents admitted he sought information on the mortgage fraud case, but claimed it was only public information.

A defense attorney claimed in court Thursday that the federal government's bribery case against Democratic Sen. Robert Menendez (N.J.) and a Florida doctor is an «attack» on Hispanic Americans.

The U.S. Supreme Court abruptly canceled oral arguments on Trump's travel ban, signaling the beginning of the end for a politically charged legal case that could have produced a blockbuster ruling on the clash between presidential power and claims of religious discrimination.

Mayor de Blasio on Sunday explained why he's refused to comment on the blockbuster appeals court ruling in favor of ex-Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver — by claiming he hasn't «paid attention» to the state's biggest political corruption case in decades.

Justice Kolawole had on March 21, 2017 stopped the trial of the defendants in the case when the EFCC in a press statement quoted the court proceedings upside with claims that the defendants were indicted for N36B contract fraud and put on trial before the court.

An Albany County Court judge Monday turned down a motion to dismiss a corruption case against State Sen. Robert Ortt, R - North Tonawanda, on a claim that he was improperly denied a chance to speak before an Albany County grand jury on March 23.

The case has gone through multiple hearings (details below), resulting in a court order that requires DEMS scientists to turn over all data related to DEMS, including drafts of scientific papers based on that data, to the mining coalition and to the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Education and the Workforce, which claims jurisdiction over the study.

That was the ruling in each of three critical test cases handed down on February 12 by the U.S. Court of Federal Claims in Washington, D.C..

However, the vaccine court didn't recognize Bruesewitz's claim because, 1 month before her case was filed, the type of complications she experienced were removed from a list of those entitled to compensation, based on epidemiological evidence that vaccines weren't the cause.

In the Supreme Court ruling on a case that aimed to stop the project, the top Israeli judges noted that during the planning period, «no one raised any claim, on even one occasion, that the planning procedures violated the sanctity of the site.»

«Vaccines can be blamed for illness without scientific proof,» read many headlines about the European Court of Justice's (ECJ's) ruling on the case of a French man who claimed that a hepatitis B vaccine caused his multiple sclerosis (MS).

He's given this opinion in court on several occasions as an expert witness in cases where a lawyer of a defendant caught drink - driving has claimed that their client has undiagnosed auto - brewery syndrome.

Todd Hollis, a Pittsburgh attorney who claims to have been defamed by statements posted on the site by women who say they dated him, filed the defamation case in June 2006 in Pennsylvania state court.

In recent months similar cases have been dismissed in courts in California and Texas against MySpace.com and Craiglist.com using the Communications Decency Act, a law which protects forum providers on the Internet against legal claims arising from posts made by third parties.

The sugar daddy actually filed the case in small claims court, but was then approached by the producers who originally wanted to have it on Judge Judy.

In ruling on the due - process question, the appeals court overturned a district court's decision to dismiss the case, which involved a San Antonio science teacher's claim that he was «constructively discharged «3from his position without a hearing prior to his dismissal.

The court's refusal without comment to hear the appeal in Evans v. Jenkins (Case No. 07 - 1210) means that the parent's suit will go forward on a First Amendment retaliation claim.

In the Seattle case, the District Court granted the school district summary judgment, finding, inter alia, that its plan survived strict scrutiny on the federal constitutional claim because it was narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest.

The education community should be watching to see how the Supreme Court rules on a housing case from Dallas which considers whether plaintiffs can bring «disparate impact» claims under the Fair Housing Act (FHA).

The unanimous decision, which marked the first time the high court had heard a case on the subject, clears the way for Laramie County School District No. 1 to pursue its $ 200,000 negligence and breach - of - contract claim against the architects of a school that began to crumble less than 10 years after it was built.

Perry, a senior at West Charlotte High, a formerly all - black school on the city's west side, was protesting a court case that found one white parent suing the school system over the claim that his daughter was twice denied entry to a local magnet school on the basis of her race.

In a 2010 pretrial ruling, the Connecticut Supreme Court affirmed the State's constitutional obligation and remanded the case back to the trial court for full trial on the merits of Plaintiffs» adequacy and equity clCourt affirmed the State's constitutional obligation and remanded the case back to the trial court for full trial on the merits of Plaintiffs» adequacy and equity clcourt for full trial on the merits of Plaintiffs» adequacy and equity claims.

In addition, the court... [noted] that claims made by Lampack that the contract placed a fiduciary duty on Grimes» -LCB- are -RCB- unsupported by case law and the general principles of agency law that the obligations that a principal owes an agent are not fiduciary.»

If you used the airline's ADR scheme and you're not happy with the outcome... The adjudicator's decision is only binding on the airline, not on you, so if you're unhappy with the outcome you could consider taking your case to the small claims court.

An attorney is only going to take a case on a contingency fee basis if there is a solid claim under one of these laws and he or she believes that there is a strong likelihood of succeeding in court.