Not exact matches
The obvious question is whether Lindzen will now concede that his
claim, and the inference he drew from it, has been falsified, and that
warming has not in fact
ceased as he suggested.
-- never predicted monotonic
warming — never predicted that natural variability would
cease — do argue for significant
warming by the end of the century — suggest several possible causes for the current
warming hiatus * — reject
claims that the hiatus invalidates any of the above on grounds of robust physics and parsimonious reasoning
It never
ceases to amaze me that scientists on both sides
claim to be certain that they know exactly how all of this stuff works and that their pronouncements concerning whether we will experience runaway
warming or start the next glacial episode are correct.
If you want to
claim global
warming has
ceased, you need to provide evidence that the trend is different from what it has been.