While
some claims about the evils of gluten can - and have - been exaggerated, Factor 75 chose to eliminate gluten from all of our meals.
Not exact matches
I was answering the specific
claim made, which was
about: «Let me explain why religious people think Atheists are
evil:»
@fimeilleur actually i can back up the
claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on
about that men use to justify their
evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.
Before you suggested I either believed in your god or don't so why should I
claim is an
evil monster and therefore should not make comments
about same, is that correct?
I'm talking
about stopping what they
claim is
evil.
Your right there was a time that we did not know
about germs and the religious
claimed it was demons and
evil spirits that made people sick.
It is simply false, therefore, to
claim that Plantinga must view all
evils in the actual world as necessary for bringing
about some greater good or avoiding some greater
evil.
For example, the Protestant doctrine that we are all sinners is reflected in the Freudian - Marxist behaviorist - positivist claptrap
claiming that there is no virtue, that all our actions arise from dark psychic urges, exploitative class greed or biological impulses — which supposedly proves that talk
about good and
evil, right and wrong, and certainly saintliness is illusory.
to ascribe anything but
evil intent to the Pope's motives make one suspect that it is not one decision that is the real problem: it is really
about the fact that the nature of Catholicism and the role of the Pope have at their core a
claim so audacious as to provoke outrage.
I do hear your points that you think I have not seen the need for warning of danger, that you believe I think of it as «unChristian» to talk
about such things, and that you may even believe that my comments are akin to protecting
evil deeds and harming the innocent, using the bible as a proof texting weapon to that end and contributing to a problem of church becoming fake and shallow while
claiming to be deep and pious.
Process theism, by relinquishing the
claim that God could completely control the world in order to overcome the problem of present
evil, can not have this traditional assurance
about the future.
Mackie's challenge can now be formulated so: since there is no contradiction in the
claim that God brings
about a world devoid of
evil, if God is Omnipotent, it is within his power to do so.
``... you will be blessed... people will insult you and persecute you, and say all kinds of
evil things
about you... and that's just the ones who will
claim to follow you...»
We do not add any additional
claim about our knowing that God in fact prevents all genuine
evil.
Recently there has been a bunch of talk going around
about «wheat belly»,
claiming how
evil gluten is for your body.
And if, on the other hand, Malloy, the CEA and the AFT want to
claim that Malloy is the «better of two
evils,» then at the very least they have the obligation to tell the truth
about Malloy's record.
How
about claiming that gamers are «
evil» and «sexist» and «bigoted» and other crap, based on the same insane troll logic that you laughed at back when Jack Thompson was the enemy of the moment?
Certainly, he's plenty vague and doesn't directly and explicitly
claim «fraud» or «conspiracy» or «coverup», but he does let his minions blabber on and on
about how
evil and wrong climate scientists are...
Thus woman has taken her divorce battle to the Internet; posting a video on Youtube that includes information
about their sex life, Viagra, pornography and her
claims of an
evil daughter in - law.