In 2009, the European Food Safety Authority reviewed the science and found no justification for
claims about the health risks from BCM7.
Not exact matches
Some companies offer incentive programs to encourage employee participation in
health and wellness programs because learning
about potential
risks and screenings for early detection helps decrease large
claims.
Making it hurt: The strategy of
risk The irony, of course, is that individuals and organizations so determined to convince women to breastfeed because of evidence - based
claims about its
health effects are themselves choosing a breastfeeding promotion approach that is not based on actual evidence.
You had me worried when you mentioned your «bad feeling»
about low cholesterol levels in vegans and while there seems to be plenty evidence to support the
claim that having high cholesterol can be positive for many
health reasons, I've not found any hard evidence that outright proves that vegans and vegetarians who eat a well balanced diet AND have low cholesterol are at
risk of cancer, brain and nervous system issues, etc..
While there isn't sufficient evidence of such
claims about juice and its effect on our
health, there is a substantial link between eating a plant - based diet and a reduced
risk for cancer.
The FDA says that consuming 25 grams of soy protein daily reduces your
risk of heart disease yet even the American Heart Association no longer supports the
health claims about soy endorsed by the U.S. government.
The
claim argues that if physicians had known the increased
risks, they would have prescribed alternative medications, and patients who did take these drugs also would have been more vigilant
about monitoring their
health and potentially severe side effects.
In its defence of two actions against Imperial Tobacco, one being litigation by British Columbia for
health care costs incurred by BC to treat illnesses caused by tobacco usage, and the second being a
claim by class members who bought «light» or «mild» cigarettes, Imperial Tobacco sought to add Canada as a third party, based on statements Canada made to tobacco companies and the public
about the purportedly lesser
risk of «light» reduced - tar cigarettes as compared with normal cigarettes.
Ontario's statement of
claim alleges that the defendant tobacco companies knew
about the addictiveness of cigarettes and the
health damages they caused and deceived the public by misrepresenting the
risks.