Sentences with phrase «claims against device»
Rick Georges, whose blog is a must - read for those keeping tabs on BlackBerry news, has the latest on the USPTO's final rejection of one of NTP's patent claims against device maker RIM.
http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/ Not exact matches
The Illusionary Treatment Option» by Gary Reinl, a former personal trainer and the developer of an electronic stimulation device, in which he argues that ice delays healing from a sports injury, quoting no less an authority than Dr. Gabe Mirkin, who, it says, is credited with developing the rehabilitation acronym RICE (rest, ice, compression, and elevation), as now being against the practice because, he claims, icing «decreases circulation, so it slows healing.»
You should be wary of and avoid using most infant sleep devices that make claims to protect against SIDS and other risks during sleep for baby as there is no research.
The AAP concurs with the US Food and Drug Administration and Consumer Product Safety Commission that manufacturers should not claim that a product or device protects against SIDS unless there is scientific evidence to that effect.
Judge Carlos Lucero, in a partial dissent, argued against such immunity: «The notion that a device manufacturer is immune from liability for harm caused by its device when the manufacturer has pushed the device for a use that the [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] never approved is neither logical nor consistent with the Supreme Court's prior rulings about the scope of preemption of claims arising from harm caused by medical devices.»
Protect yourself against viruses and malware that cause popups and unwanted ads with Avast Mobile Security and Antivirus, the world's most «Security Notice» email claims that your Apple ID has been locked because the company noticed an attempt to sign in from an «unrecognized device».
«The Company intends to defend itself vigorously, particularly against any claims that the Company engaged in any deliberate scheme to install defeat devices to cheat U.S. emissions tests,» FCA said.
It is the «acting in concert» bit in the above ruling that Apple is citing, while extending its tirade against retailers as well that are engaged in selling the devices it claims has infringed its patents.
Barnes and Noble is very much positioning this device against Amazon's Kindle Fire, claiming their Nook tablet has a superior screen, and touting the fact it is lighter and has more RAM and storage.
To back up his claims, he pitted a Tegra 4 enabled tablet device against one of the fastest tablet devices now available, the Nexus 10.
He was also against other jack - of - all - trades, master - of - none devices like phones, and famously claimed that «people don't read anymore» as his rationale never to sell ebooks.
Additionally, «we» or «us» shall mean any third party providing benefits, services, or products in connection with the Account (including but not limited to credit reporting agencies, merchants that accept any credit device issued under the Account, rewards programs and enrollment services, credit insurance companies, debt collectors, and all of their officers, directors, employees, agents and representatives) if, and only if, such a third party is named by you as a co-defendant in any Claim you assert against us.
The CEO of Rockstar's parent company, Take - Two, has spoken out against VR, claiming there's no market for the devices currently.
In 2013, Iwata again stood firmly against smartphone gaming, claiming that in order to succeed, Nintendo would need to do «things that smart devices can not do.»
They may have to claim that your recording was interfering with something they or other emergency responders were doing, that you disobeyed a direct order to stop, that they interpreted your recording as being aggressive against them in some way, that they thought your recording device might be a gun, or that you were watching something illegal, etc.; especially the latter few would give them grounds to shoot you dead.
Andrew Kruppa chairs the Litigation Practice Group in Miami and focuses his practice on defending claims against manufacturers of pharmaceuticals and medical devices.
Against that background, Apple only asked for 60 cents per device from Motorola (which still seemed too much for Judge Posner, though not for the appeals court), less than one - twentieth of its per - unit damages demand from Samsung in the current case, in which Apple pursued a broader claim construction that enabled it to claim ownership of the whole feature as opposed to a particular internal architecture that can be avoided.
The pursuit of claims against drug and medical device manufacturers by injured individuals serves a critical role in holding manufacturers accountable and protecting consumers from unreasonable risks and dangerous products.
The product liability attorneys of The Cochran Firm, D.C. have the experience and resources necessary to litigate these complex claims against powerful medical device manufacturers like CR Bard, Inc. and Cook Medical Group.
In this groundbreaking case, the Michigan Court of Appeals ruled that the trial court correctly dismissed a legal malpractice suit against the attorney and his law firm because the underlying product liability claim plaintiffs» asserted should have been pursued was statutorily preempted under the federal Medical Device Act («MDA»).
Contact The Cochran Firm, D.C. for a free legal consultation to see if you have a claim against a medical device manufacturer for your IVC filter injury.
The attorneys at Arias Sanguinetti Wang & Torrijos are currently investigating the claims against manufacture of transvaginal mesh devices.
The revised guidelines allow a lawyer to state that the device contains documents against which a claim of attorney - client privilege or attorney work product may be made and initiates a procedure to be followed.
A new university study and the ever - increasing use of wireless devices, such as the BlackBerry, could result in a flood of lawsuits against employers for creating an allegedly dangerous environment where unpaid overwork is required for success, promotion and job security, a leading law firm warns -LSB-...] Giving rise to possible claims, is a recent study by Gayle Porter, Associate Professor of Management at Rutgers University in New Jersey, which suggests possible liability for companies if they keep their employees on «electronic leashes» as part of their job requirements.
Also in the last couple of years, Justice Mosley, in NOV Downhole Eurasia Limited v. TLL Oil Field Consulting, 2014 FC 889, considered whether a pleading ought to be struck that referred to the file history to defend against infringement arguing that a feature added during prosecution and appearing in each of the claims did not exist in their device.
In Verticor, Ltd. v. Wood, an appellate court considered whether personal injury lawsuits against a medical device manufacturer count as health care liability claims for the purposes of the Texas Medical Liability Act (TMLA).
While no victims have stepped forward yet, the revelation could means patients may have claims against the medical device maker and hospital, some potentially worth significant compensation.
Beyond looking for more cost - effective ways to defend against medical products liability claims and comply with FDA pre-market and post-marketing mandates, medical device companies are seeking proactive ways to protect themselves from this high - stakes litigation.
Defending claims against hospitals arising from defects in design, manufacture and maintenance of equipment and medical devices, including imaging systems, defibrillators, endoscopy equipment, surgical instrumentation and fixation devices.
A personal injury claim against the party responsible for causing the injuries typically seeks reimbursement for any past, present, and future medical bills, along with rehabilitation costs, home nursing care, lost wages due to missed work, future lost wages due to the inability to work, necessary medical equipment, devices and medication, and the costs of adapting one's home and vehicles for disability accommodations.
«Hour long depositions of unserved potential defendants regarding whether they used the infringing devices, questions speaking directly to the merits of Plaintiff's claim, not only lack specificity but weigh against the potential defendants» expectation of privacy.
These are the first of many settlements filed against the J & J unit involving claims alleging that its mesh medical device caused injury to thousands of women.
Currently, there are over 40,000 defective medical device claims in federal and state courts involving plaintiffs seeking compensation against American Medical Systems Inc., Johnson & Johnson Inc., Ethicon Inc., American Medical Systems, CR Bard Inc., Gynecare, Tyco, Covidien, Mentor, Sofradim, and others.
If so, you may have a claim against Zimmer, Inc., the company that manufacturers the knee replacement device.
Apple's patent infringement claims are mostly in areas the OIN doesn't even cover — and if the OIN had wanted to stop Apple from suing Android device makers, it would have had almost four years now (counting from Apple's first lawsuit against HTC in March 2010) to do so.
A Michigan district court judge determined that the Clean Air Act did not preclude plaintiffs from bringing 53 state law fraudulent concealment and consumer protection claims against General Motors LLC and its suppliers for developing and installing devices on GM diesel trucks to cheat emissions tests.
The Drug and Medical Device Product Liability Deskbook includes: detailed coverage of: warning - related claims and defenses; other information - based theories; strict liability; FDA - related per se liability; preemption of common law tort claims by the Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act and FDA regulations; class actions in drug and medical device litigation; theories of liability asserted against entities other than manufacturers; practical issues involving litigation management; the use of expert witnesses; and many other important tDevice Product Liability Deskbook includes: detailed coverage of: warning - related claims and defenses; other information - based theories; strict liability; FDA - related per se liability; preemption of common law tort claims by the Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act and FDA regulations; class actions in drug and medical device litigation; theories of liability asserted against entities other than manufacturers; practical issues involving litigation management; the use of expert witnesses; and many other important tdevice litigation; theories of liability asserted against entities other than manufacturers; practical issues involving litigation management; the use of expert witnesses; and many other important topics.
Beginning on July 1, any person who alleges they are affected by an «act or omission» that constitutes a contravention of s. 6 - 9 of CASL, i.e., (i) relating to violations of the unsolicited electronic messages requirements (including sending commercial electronic messages, unless the recipient provided express or implied consent and the message complies with the prescribed form and content requirements), (ii) the alteration of transmission data in electronic messages, (iii) the installation of computer programs on devices without consent or (iv) aiding, inducing or promoting any act contrary to any of the above sections, can launch claims against alleged offenders seeking financial redress.
The difficulty, says Mitchell, is there is a real temptation for employers to encourage employees to respond as quickly as possible using mobile devices (even after business hours), but it has to be balanced against the risk that overtime - eligible employees may subsequently make claims for pay for the time spent reviewing and responding to e-mails outside of work.
Sheryl has defended against claims across the country relating to an array of products, including prescription and over-the counter medications, dietary supplements, airway management devices, latex gloves, orthopedic implants and cold therapy machines.
... U.S. foundation that helps companies commercialize technology has filed a patent lawsuit against some of the largest wireless device makers in the world, claiming they are using infringing Bluetooth microprocessors made by a UK - based firm.
Google on Wednesday unveiled new phones, smart speakers and other devices infused with artificial intelligence in its bid to claim the high ground against rivals Amazon and Apple.
Microsoft claims to hold software patents that Android infringes on, and they threaten lawsuits against Android device manufacturers until they settle.
I find it ironic that the «lower - tech» claim is used against Samsung when Apple has historically had «lower - tech» compared to even mid-range Android devices.
Motorola makes a bold claim, saying this device is going to be the fastest charging phone showing onstage a demo of it charging against the Galaxy S6.
Symantec and Kaspersky are some of the leading antivirus companies that claim to detect and protect devices against «Petya» infections.
The Claims section of the patent suggests that the device will communicate wirelessly with an external sensor, which will be able to track stroke duration, force against a «non-touch-sensitive surface», three - dimensional motion and orientation, and «plurality» of strokes.
A variant of the Mirai botnet is likely to have been used in attacks against one or more companies in the financial sector in January, the security firm Recorded Future claims, pointing out that this is the first time a botnet made up of Internet of Things devices has been used since Mirai.
Sources are claiming that Google is working on a new smart screen device that will compete against the Amazon Echo Show.
Google Pixel 2 XLI ventured out into Bryant Park on a dreary February morning to compare the devices, and the Pixel 2 XL once again staked its claim as one of the finest phones for photography, just as it did against the equally capable iPhone X.