I find it interesting that this is one of the biggest
claims against mainstream detergents, yet you have brought up many «studies» none of which claim any repelling issues.
Not exact matches
They and their allies and supporters (such as the 300 + self - identified LGBT and allied scholars, lawyers, journalists, and activists who published the manifesto «Beyond Same - Sex Marriage» — a group that includes respected
mainstream figures such as Gloria Steinem, Barbara Ehrenreich, and Kenji Yoshino) would, I have no doubt, sharply react
against the
claim that polyamory «is attractive because monogamy is hard.»
He
claimed the current system was biased
against disabled children going into
mainstream schools, but that Tory proposals would make it even harder.
Another way of saying it: Although we are seeing less outright false balance in climate coverage than a decade or two ago, bias
against mainstream science understanding persists in the relatively subtle form of selective reporting of eyebrow - raising
claims, which strengthen the impression that scientists are always changing their story, in which case, shrug.
And, as evidence of the utter intellectual shamelessness of delusionism, you can't beat the campaign
against wind power, driven by the kinds of absurd
claims of risk that would be mocked, mercilessly and deservedly, if they came from the
mainstream environmental movement.
Given the magnitude of potential harms from climate change, those who make skeptical arguments
against the
mainstream scientific view on climate change have a duty to submit skeptical arguments to peer - review, acknowledge what is not in dispute about climate change science and not only focus on what is unknown, refrain from making specious
claims about
mainstream science of climate change such as the entire scientific basis for climate change has been completely debunked, and assume the burden of proof to show that emissions of greenhouse gases are benign.
It acknowledges that any plausible path toward climate mitigation will involve a lot of nuclear energy, carbon capture and natural gas, pushing back
against the delusional
claims of the
mainstream environmental movement that deep reductions in emissions can be accomplished with present - day wind, solar and energy - efficiency technologies alone.
Some of the arguments
against climate change policies based upon scientific uncertainty should and can be responded to on scientific grounds especially in light of the fact that many
claims about scientific uncertainty about human - induced warming are great distortions of
mainstream climate change science.
Given the magnitude of potential harms from climate change, those who make skeptical arguments
against the
mainstream scientific view on climate change have a duty to submit skeptical arguments to peer - review, acknowledge what is not in dispute about climate change science and not only focus on what is unknown, refrain from making specious
claims about the
mainstream science of climate change such as the entire scientific basis for climate change that has been completely debunked, and assume the burden of proof to show that emissions of greenhouse gases are benign.
Except the
mainstream media essentially does not tell Gore's followers about these problems, nor is a science - based, calm, rational rebuttal permitted
against IPCC / NASA / NOAA
claims.