In its original Complaint, the Government made four
claims against Defendants under three federal statutes.
[6] The plaintiff
claims against the defendant under all heads of damages for his personal injuries, in the total sum of $ 739,664.
Not exact matches
We advise business clients and insurers on pollution and other environmental
claims, and have extensive experience litigating
claims under federal and state statutes in clean - up cases, either defending
against liability and allocation among
defendants, or seeking reimbursement for recovery costs from responsible parties.
Acting (with Thomas Grant QC) for the
defendant in a
claim brought by an international car hire company
against an English automotive repair company
under long - term service contracts, where it is alleged that the repair company dishonestly carried out millions of pounds of unnecessary work.
Instead, they were only sued
under the PAGA
claim, and here is the kicker — plaintiffs never sought fee entitlement in the notice of motion and motion
under the PAGA fee - shifting provision much less attempted to segregate fee recovery
against individual
defendants solely
against the PAGA
claim.
Special costs to successful applicants in most cases
Defendants who succeed in having the
claims against them stuck
under this law should be entitled to costs on a full indemnity basis, subject to a judge's discretion in exceptional cases where such are not warranted.
The
defendant was only insured for $ 50,000, and we successfully pursued an
under - insured motorist
claim for our client
against her own auto insurance carrier, collecting an additional $ 205,000.
The arbitrator granted summary disposition in favor of the
defendants, finding that: (1) CHSI was not a proper respondent to the action and that Weirton failed to state
claims against CHSI; (2) all of Weirton's
claims, except for the breach - of - contract
claim against Quorum, were barred by res judicata or collateral estoppel; (3) Weirton's breach - of - contract
claim against Quorum was time - barred
under the applicable Tennessee statute of limitations; (4) Weirton's tort
claims were alternatively barred by the gist - of - the - action doctrine; and (5) Weirton's unjust enrichment
claim was barred because of the parties» contracts (the «Second Award»).
The
defendant's therefore
claimed the cost of the investigation in the amount of $ 2,233.24
against the claimant
under the terms of the offer (Tomas v. Mackie, 2015 BCSC 364).
120 (1) If a
defendant makes a payment to a plaintiff who is or alleges to be entitled to recover from the
defendant, the payment constitutes, to the extent of the payment, a release by the plaintiff or the plaintiff's personal representative of any
claim that the plaintiff or the plaintiff's personal representative or any person
claiming through or
under the plaintiff or by virtue of Part V of the Family Law Act may have
against the
defendant.
The Court of Appeal determined that the effect of the order
under appeal was to «permanently foreclose» the Appellant from obtaining a determination of its
claims against the personal
defendants on their merits — a result that amounted to an injustice.
Kurdish victims of mustard gas attacks in northern Iraq in the late 1980s have not stated
claims under the Torture Victim Protection Act or the Alien Tort Statute
against defendant chemical manufacturer, who allegedly sold thiodiglycol to Saddam Hussein; the...
The stay of proceedings in British Columbia means that Northwestpharmacy's
claims against all the
defendants are now within the jurisdiction of an arbitrator
under the International Rules of the American Arbitration Association.
The claimants issued a
claim under RA 1886
against the
defendant in respect of damage to, or destruction of, property in the centre caused by those detained in it during the riot.
The children
claimed against the
defendant for bereavement damages
under s. 8 of the Fatal Accidents Act.
Worldwide tracing and freezing injunctions in support of Noga's
claim against the Abacha
defendants and a well known bank arising out of their dealings with funds in which Noga
claim a beneficial interest; whether Noga had an equitable proprietary interest in the bills of exchange and their proceeds
under their contract with the Russian Federation; whether individuals in the governments of Russia and / or Nigeria acted fraudulently.
Schuckman Realty v. Marine Midland Bank (244 A.D. 2d 400)- broker not entitled to recover a commission from
defendant under contract theory where broker entered into brokerage agreements with parties other than the
defendant; broker's
claim against defendant in quantum meruit fails due to the existence of a valid and enforceable agreement governing the particular subject matter (i.e., commission agreement between broker and other parties).
Venezia v. Coldwell Banker Sammis Realty (270 A.D. 2d 480)- buyer's action
against seller for fraud for failing to disclose toxic contamination of untapped ground water beneath the property and surrounding area dismissed; cause of action
against brokers severed; buyer's
claim of fraud
against seller was extinguished upon closing as a result of specific merger clause in contract of sale; moreover, buyer's failed to allege that seller made any representation about the condition of the land's subsurface or groundwater and did not allege that seller engaged in concealment or otherwise deceitful conduct designed to prevent the discovery of such contamination; seller is
under no duty to speak; salesperson of one of the
defendant real estate agencies represented to buyer that the house was in good condition