Employees may seek to bring
claims against their employers arising out of the subject matter of an investigation, or how the investigation is handled; conversely, an employer may wish to take action against an employee implicated in the conduct under investigation.
Not exact matches
As you may recall, in a 5 - 4 decision back in 2007, the Supreme Court ruled that Ledbetter's
claim against her
employer for paying her less than her male counterparts because of her gender was time barred because her present lower pay
arose out of salary decisions made years earlier, well outside of the 180 - day statute of limitations for discriminatory employment practices under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
The Birmingham litigation is the largest of the
claims against local authority
employers arising out of the implementation of «single status», the framework which was aimed at removing pay differentials between men and women, and which was intended to be in place across all local authorities by April 2007.
Ms Pereira de Souza brought disability discrimination
claims against her former
employer, and was awarded # 9,000 for injury to feelings and # 3,000 for psychiatric injury
arising out of the discrimination.
The Donovan Commission in 1968 wanted tribunals to deal with «all disputes
arising between
employers and employees from their contracts of employment or from any statutory
claims they may have
against each other».
When litigation has been necessary, Stephen has defended
employers against claims arising under Title VII, ADEA, ADA, FMLA, SOX, FLSA, NDAA, IRCA, and other similar statutes, and he has defended
employers against various tort
claims.
Ms. Reyes understands both the emotional and financial implications of employment
claims, which often
arise out of situations that leave the employee helpless
against an
employer, and uses that compassion and understanding to effectively seek out justice for aggrieved employees.
So, too, no fees or costs were covered by Labor Code section 2802, because that provision only required the
employer to cover third - party
claims arising out of a lawsuit
against the employee
arising out of the course and scope of her employment, again not encompassing expenses incurred in responding to law enforcement investigations.
She
claimed damages
against both her
employer and her supervisor, Mr. Morris, for damages
arising from her wrongful dismissal, a series of sexual assaults, and sexual and racial harassment.
In addition to defending
against employees»
claims of sexual harassment and all forms of discrimination, including gender, race, and sexual orientation, BHPK attorneys have also successfully represented
employers in
claims brought by their employees for wrongful termination, whistleblower
claims, contract disputes, and issues
arising out of alleged violations of The Family and Medical Leave Act.
Whether an employee is
claiming they were sexually harassed or discriminated
against when they were bypassed for a promotion, BHPK attorneys have tremendous experience helping
employers navigate the oftentimes delicate work atmosphere that
arises after an employee files a
claim or complaint.
Gardner's personal injury
claim arose from an automobile accident and was filed
against his
employer, Union Pacific Railroad Company (UPRC), and eight other defendants, six of whom were not related to UPRC.
Defended breach of fiduciary duty
claim by corporation
against its former CEO
arising from CEO's alleged theft of corporate opportunity and establishment of competing business; after trial, CEO used profits from his new business to acquire his former
employer
Protects an
employer against the
claims for damages, which
arise out of the injuries to employees in the course of their work.